Cargando…
Trustworthy or flawed clinical prediction rule?
Autores principales: | Granholm, Anders, Perner, Anders, Jensen, Aksel Karl Georg, Møller, Morten Hylander |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29415758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-1961-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Important methodological flaws in the recently published clinical prediction model the REMEMBER score
por: Granholm, Anders, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU): protocol for the development and validation of a bedside clinical prediction rule
por: Granholm, Anders, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Use of days alive without life support and similar count outcomes in randomised clinical trials – an overview and comparison of methodological choices and analysis methods
por: Granholm, Anders, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Predictive Performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and the Initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score in Acutely Ill Intensive Care Patients: Post-Hoc Analyses of the SUP-ICU Inception Cohort Study
por: Granholm, Anders, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Anthon, Carl Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2017)