Cargando…

Supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain

BACKGROUND: Pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases can be tracked by studying the causality relationships among the factors contributing to its development. We could, for instance, hypothesize on the connections of the pathogenesis outcomes to the observed conditions. And to prove such causal hypothe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agibetov, Asan, Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto, Ondrésik, Marta, Solimando, Alessandro, Banerjee, Imon, Guerrini, Giovanna, Catalano, Chiara E., Oliveira, Joaquim M., Patanè, Giuseppe, Reis, Rui L., Spagnuolo, Michela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29422110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-018-0177-x
_version_ 1783298771842498560
author Agibetov, Asan
Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto
Ondrésik, Marta
Solimando, Alessandro
Banerjee, Imon
Guerrini, Giovanna
Catalano, Chiara E.
Oliveira, Joaquim M.
Patanè, Giuseppe
Reis, Rui L.
Spagnuolo, Michela
author_facet Agibetov, Asan
Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto
Ondrésik, Marta
Solimando, Alessandro
Banerjee, Imon
Guerrini, Giovanna
Catalano, Chiara E.
Oliveira, Joaquim M.
Patanè, Giuseppe
Reis, Rui L.
Spagnuolo, Michela
author_sort Agibetov, Asan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases can be tracked by studying the causality relationships among the factors contributing to its development. We could, for instance, hypothesize on the connections of the pathogenesis outcomes to the observed conditions. And to prove such causal hypotheses we would need to have the full understanding of the causal relationships, and we would have to provide all the necessary evidences to support our claims. In practice, however, we might not possess all the background knowledge on the causality relationships, and we might be unable to collect all the evidence to prove our hypotheses. RESULTS: In this work we propose a methodology for the translation of biological knowledge on causality relationships of biological processes and their effects on conditions to a computational framework for hypothesis testing. The methodology consists of two main points: hypothesis graph construction from the formalization of the background knowledge on causality relationships, and confidence measurement in a causality hypothesis as a normalized weighted path computation in the hypothesis graph. In this framework, we can simulate collection of evidences and assess confidence in a causality hypothesis by measuring it proportionally to the amount of available knowledge and collected evidences. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluate our methodology on a hypothesis graph that represents both contributing factors which may cause cartilage degradation and the factors which might be caused by the cartilage degradation during osteoarthritis. Hypothesis graph construction has proven to be robust to the addition of potentially contradictory information on the simultaneously positive and negative effects. The obtained confidence measures for the specific causality hypotheses have been validated by our domain experts, and, correspond closely to their subjective assessments of confidences in investigated hypotheses. Overall, our methodology for a shared hypothesis testing framework exhibits important properties that researchers will find useful in literature review for their experimental studies, planning and prioritizing evidence collection acquisition procedures, and testing their hypotheses with different depths of knowledge on causal dependencies of biological processes and their effects on the observed conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5804102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58041022018-02-14 Supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain Agibetov, Asan Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto Ondrésik, Marta Solimando, Alessandro Banerjee, Imon Guerrini, Giovanna Catalano, Chiara E. Oliveira, Joaquim M. Patanè, Giuseppe Reis, Rui L. Spagnuolo, Michela J Biomed Semantics Research BACKGROUND: Pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases can be tracked by studying the causality relationships among the factors contributing to its development. We could, for instance, hypothesize on the connections of the pathogenesis outcomes to the observed conditions. And to prove such causal hypotheses we would need to have the full understanding of the causal relationships, and we would have to provide all the necessary evidences to support our claims. In practice, however, we might not possess all the background knowledge on the causality relationships, and we might be unable to collect all the evidence to prove our hypotheses. RESULTS: In this work we propose a methodology for the translation of biological knowledge on causality relationships of biological processes and their effects on conditions to a computational framework for hypothesis testing. The methodology consists of two main points: hypothesis graph construction from the formalization of the background knowledge on causality relationships, and confidence measurement in a causality hypothesis as a normalized weighted path computation in the hypothesis graph. In this framework, we can simulate collection of evidences and assess confidence in a causality hypothesis by measuring it proportionally to the amount of available knowledge and collected evidences. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluate our methodology on a hypothesis graph that represents both contributing factors which may cause cartilage degradation and the factors which might be caused by the cartilage degradation during osteoarthritis. Hypothesis graph construction has proven to be robust to the addition of potentially contradictory information on the simultaneously positive and negative effects. The obtained confidence measures for the specific causality hypotheses have been validated by our domain experts, and, correspond closely to their subjective assessments of confidences in investigated hypotheses. Overall, our methodology for a shared hypothesis testing framework exhibits important properties that researchers will find useful in literature review for their experimental studies, planning and prioritizing evidence collection acquisition procedures, and testing their hypotheses with different depths of knowledge on causal dependencies of biological processes and their effects on the observed conditions. BioMed Central 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5804102/ /pubmed/29422110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-018-0177-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Agibetov, Asan
Jiménez-Ruiz, Ernesto
Ondrésik, Marta
Solimando, Alessandro
Banerjee, Imon
Guerrini, Giovanna
Catalano, Chiara E.
Oliveira, Joaquim M.
Patanè, Giuseppe
Reis, Rui L.
Spagnuolo, Michela
Supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain
title Supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain
title_full Supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain
title_fullStr Supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain
title_full_unstemmed Supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain
title_short Supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain
title_sort supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29422110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-018-0177-x
work_keys_str_mv AT agibetovasan supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain
AT jimenezruizernesto supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain
AT ondresikmarta supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain
AT solimandoalessandro supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain
AT banerjeeimon supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain
AT guerrinigiovanna supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain
AT catalanochiarae supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain
AT oliveirajoaquimm supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain
AT patanegiuseppe supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain
AT reisruil supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain
AT spagnuolomichela supportingsharedhypothesistestinginthebiomedicaldomain