Cargando…

In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

OBJECTIVES: Addition of chlorhexidine has enhanced the antimicrobial effect of glass ionomer cement (GIC) indicated to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART); however, the impact of this mixture on the properties of these materials and on the longevity of restorations must be investigated. The aim o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duque, Cristiane, Aida, Kelly Limi, Pereira, Jesse Augusto, Teixeira, Gláucia Schuindt, Caldo-Teixeira, Angela Scarparo, Perrone, Luciana Rodrigues, Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio, Negrini, Thais de Cássia, de Castilho, Aline Rogéria Freire, Costa, Carlos Alberto de Souza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29069152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195
_version_ 1783298836961165312
author Duque, Cristiane
Aida, Kelly Limi
Pereira, Jesse Augusto
Teixeira, Gláucia Schuindt
Caldo-Teixeira, Angela Scarparo
Perrone, Luciana Rodrigues
Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio
Negrini, Thais de Cássia
de Castilho, Aline Rogéria Freire
Costa, Carlos Alberto de Souza
author_facet Duque, Cristiane
Aida, Kelly Limi
Pereira, Jesse Augusto
Teixeira, Gláucia Schuindt
Caldo-Teixeira, Angela Scarparo
Perrone, Luciana Rodrigues
Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio
Negrini, Thais de Cássia
de Castilho, Aline Rogéria Freire
Costa, Carlos Alberto de Souza
author_sort Duque, Cristiane
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Addition of chlorhexidine has enhanced the antimicrobial effect of glass ionomer cement (GIC) indicated to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART); however, the impact of this mixture on the properties of these materials and on the longevity of restorations must be investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of incorporating chlorhexidine (CHX) in the in vitro biological and chemical-mechanical properties of GIC and in vivo clinical/ microbiological follow-up of the ART with GIC containing or not CHX. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For in vitro studies, groups were divided into GIC, GIC with 1.25% CHX, and GIC with 2.5% CHX. Antimicrobial activity of GIC was analyzed using agar diffusion and anti-biofilm assays. Cytotoxic effects, compressive tensile strength, microhardness and fluoride (F) release were also evaluated. A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 36 children that received ART either with GIC or GIC with CHX. Saliva and biofilm were collected for mutans streptococci (MS) counts and the survival rate of restorations was checked after 7 days, 3 months and one year after ART. ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/ Mann-Whitney tests were performed for in vitro tests and in vivo microbiological analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank tests were applied to estimate survival percentages of restorations (p<0.05). RESULTS: Incorporation of 1.25% and 2.5% CHX improved the antimicrobial/anti-biofilm activity of GIC, without affecting F release and mechanical characteristics, but 2.5% CHX was cytotoxic. Survival rate of restorations using GIC with 1.25% CHX was similar to GIC. A significant reduction of MS levels was observed for KM+CHX group in children saliva and biofilm 7 days after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of 1.25% CHX increased the in vitro antimicrobial activity, without changing chemical-mechanical properties of GIC and odontoblast-like cell viability. This combination improved the in vivo short-term microbiological effect without affecting clinical performance of ART restorations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5804391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58043912018-02-14 In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Duque, Cristiane Aida, Kelly Limi Pereira, Jesse Augusto Teixeira, Gláucia Schuindt Caldo-Teixeira, Angela Scarparo Perrone, Luciana Rodrigues Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio Negrini, Thais de Cássia de Castilho, Aline Rogéria Freire Costa, Carlos Alberto de Souza J Appl Oral Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: Addition of chlorhexidine has enhanced the antimicrobial effect of glass ionomer cement (GIC) indicated to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART); however, the impact of this mixture on the properties of these materials and on the longevity of restorations must be investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of incorporating chlorhexidine (CHX) in the in vitro biological and chemical-mechanical properties of GIC and in vivo clinical/ microbiological follow-up of the ART with GIC containing or not CHX. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For in vitro studies, groups were divided into GIC, GIC with 1.25% CHX, and GIC with 2.5% CHX. Antimicrobial activity of GIC was analyzed using agar diffusion and anti-biofilm assays. Cytotoxic effects, compressive tensile strength, microhardness and fluoride (F) release were also evaluated. A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 36 children that received ART either with GIC or GIC with CHX. Saliva and biofilm were collected for mutans streptococci (MS) counts and the survival rate of restorations was checked after 7 days, 3 months and one year after ART. ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/ Mann-Whitney tests were performed for in vitro tests and in vivo microbiological analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank tests were applied to estimate survival percentages of restorations (p<0.05). RESULTS: Incorporation of 1.25% and 2.5% CHX improved the antimicrobial/anti-biofilm activity of GIC, without affecting F release and mechanical characteristics, but 2.5% CHX was cytotoxic. Survival rate of restorations using GIC with 1.25% CHX was similar to GIC. A significant reduction of MS levels was observed for KM+CHX group in children saliva and biofilm 7 days after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of 1.25% CHX increased the in vitro antimicrobial activity, without changing chemical-mechanical properties of GIC and odontoblast-like cell viability. This combination improved the in vivo short-term microbiological effect without affecting clinical performance of ART restorations. Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5804391/ /pubmed/29069152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Duque, Cristiane
Aida, Kelly Limi
Pereira, Jesse Augusto
Teixeira, Gláucia Schuindt
Caldo-Teixeira, Angela Scarparo
Perrone, Luciana Rodrigues
Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio
Negrini, Thais de Cássia
de Castilho, Aline Rogéria Freire
Costa, Carlos Alberto de Souza
In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
title In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
title_full In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
title_fullStr In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
title_full_unstemmed In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
title_short In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
title_sort in vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29069152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195
work_keys_str_mv AT duquecristiane invitroandinvivoevaluationsofglassionomercementcontainingchlorhexidineforatraumaticrestorativetreatment
AT aidakellylimi invitroandinvivoevaluationsofglassionomercementcontainingchlorhexidineforatraumaticrestorativetreatment
AT pereirajesseaugusto invitroandinvivoevaluationsofglassionomercementcontainingchlorhexidineforatraumaticrestorativetreatment
AT teixeiraglauciaschuindt invitroandinvivoevaluationsofglassionomercementcontainingchlorhexidineforatraumaticrestorativetreatment
AT caldoteixeiraangelascarparo invitroandinvivoevaluationsofglassionomercementcontainingchlorhexidineforatraumaticrestorativetreatment
AT perronelucianarodrigues invitroandinvivoevaluationsofglassionomercementcontainingchlorhexidineforatraumaticrestorativetreatment
AT caiaffakarinasampaio invitroandinvivoevaluationsofglassionomercementcontainingchlorhexidineforatraumaticrestorativetreatment
AT negrinithaisdecassia invitroandinvivoevaluationsofglassionomercementcontainingchlorhexidineforatraumaticrestorativetreatment
AT decastilhoalinerogeriafreire invitroandinvivoevaluationsofglassionomercementcontainingchlorhexidineforatraumaticrestorativetreatment
AT costacarlosalbertodesouza invitroandinvivoevaluationsofglassionomercementcontainingchlorhexidineforatraumaticrestorativetreatment