Cargando…
Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review
Background: In several disease conditions, patients must inevitably be nourished by enteral feeding (EF). Though in many countries, commercial formulas are routinely used for EF, in Iran still home-made formulas are commonly employed as commercial formulas are not covered by insurance. This may pose...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iran University of Medical Sciences
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445684 http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.31.55 |
_version_ | 1783298854531104768 |
---|---|
author | Hassan-Ghomi, Majid Nikooyeh, Bahareh Motamed, Soudabeh R. Neyestani, Tirang |
author_facet | Hassan-Ghomi, Majid Nikooyeh, Bahareh Motamed, Soudabeh R. Neyestani, Tirang |
author_sort | Hassan-Ghomi, Majid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In several disease conditions, patients must inevitably be nourished by enteral feeding (EF). Though in many countries, commercial formulas are routinely used for EF, in Iran still home-made formulas are commonly employed as commercial formulas are not covered by insurance. This may pose patients to malnutrition and bring about further costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of EF commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas and thus to make further evidence for insurance policy-making Methods: Medline, Cochrane, Embass and Center for Review & Dissemination (CRD) as well as IranDoc and SID databases were searched. Keywords included formula, ICU, and enteral nutrition or tube feeding. No clinical trial study on the efficacy of EF formulas was found. Therefore, the compositions of available formulas and their cost-effectiveness were evaluated based on the clinical guidelines of scientific bodies such as American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) and relative articles available in PubMed. In addition, the expert opinions were also taken into consideration. Results: Domestic commercial formulas seemed to less merit dietary recommended intakes, i.e. the amount of some nutrients were much higher, and some others were much lower than the recommended values. The amount of several micronutrients including vitamins B1, B6, C, D and K, as well as iron, calcium and magnesium were not sufficient to meet the body needs in most commercial formulas upon receiving 2000 kilocalories and less. Conclusion: Clinical studies on the efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas are needed. Meanwhile, making suitable conditions for increasing the diversity of artificial nutrition products in the market would help clinical nutritionists to make better choices according to their patients conditions and to reduce the costs, as well. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5804464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Iran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58044642018-02-14 Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review Hassan-Ghomi, Majid Nikooyeh, Bahareh Motamed, Soudabeh R. Neyestani, Tirang Med J Islam Repub Iran Review Article Background: In several disease conditions, patients must inevitably be nourished by enteral feeding (EF). Though in many countries, commercial formulas are routinely used for EF, in Iran still home-made formulas are commonly employed as commercial formulas are not covered by insurance. This may pose patients to malnutrition and bring about further costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of EF commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas and thus to make further evidence for insurance policy-making Methods: Medline, Cochrane, Embass and Center for Review & Dissemination (CRD) as well as IranDoc and SID databases were searched. Keywords included formula, ICU, and enteral nutrition or tube feeding. No clinical trial study on the efficacy of EF formulas was found. Therefore, the compositions of available formulas and their cost-effectiveness were evaluated based on the clinical guidelines of scientific bodies such as American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) and relative articles available in PubMed. In addition, the expert opinions were also taken into consideration. Results: Domestic commercial formulas seemed to less merit dietary recommended intakes, i.e. the amount of some nutrients were much higher, and some others were much lower than the recommended values. The amount of several micronutrients including vitamins B1, B6, C, D and K, as well as iron, calcium and magnesium were not sufficient to meet the body needs in most commercial formulas upon receiving 2000 kilocalories and less. Conclusion: Clinical studies on the efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas are needed. Meanwhile, making suitable conditions for increasing the diversity of artificial nutrition products in the market would help clinical nutritionists to make better choices according to their patients conditions and to reduce the costs, as well. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2017-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5804464/ /pubmed/29445684 http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.31.55 Text en © 2017 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hassan-Ghomi, Majid Nikooyeh, Bahareh Motamed, Soudabeh R. Neyestani, Tirang Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review |
title | Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review |
title_full | Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review |
title_short | Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review |
title_sort | efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: a critical review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445684 http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.31.55 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hassanghomimajid efficacyofcommercialformulasincomparisonwithhomemadeformulasforenteralfeedingacriticalreview AT nikooyehbahareh efficacyofcommercialformulasincomparisonwithhomemadeformulasforenteralfeedingacriticalreview AT motamedsoudabeh efficacyofcommercialformulasincomparisonwithhomemadeformulasforenteralfeedingacriticalreview AT rneyestanitirang efficacyofcommercialformulasincomparisonwithhomemadeformulasforenteralfeedingacriticalreview |