Cargando…

Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review

Background: In several disease conditions, patients must inevitably be nourished by enteral feeding (EF). Though in many countries, commercial formulas are routinely used for EF, in Iran still home-made formulas are commonly employed as commercial formulas are not covered by insurance. This may pose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan-Ghomi, Majid, Nikooyeh, Bahareh, Motamed, Soudabeh, R. Neyestani, Tirang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445684
http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.31.55
_version_ 1783298854531104768
author Hassan-Ghomi, Majid
Nikooyeh, Bahareh
Motamed, Soudabeh
R. Neyestani, Tirang
author_facet Hassan-Ghomi, Majid
Nikooyeh, Bahareh
Motamed, Soudabeh
R. Neyestani, Tirang
author_sort Hassan-Ghomi, Majid
collection PubMed
description Background: In several disease conditions, patients must inevitably be nourished by enteral feeding (EF). Though in many countries, commercial formulas are routinely used for EF, in Iran still home-made formulas are commonly employed as commercial formulas are not covered by insurance. This may pose patients to malnutrition and bring about further costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of EF commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas and thus to make further evidence for insurance policy-making Methods: Medline, Cochrane, Embass and Center for Review & Dissemination (CRD) as well as IranDoc and SID databases were searched. Keywords included formula, ICU, and enteral nutrition or tube feeding. No clinical trial study on the efficacy of EF formulas was found. Therefore, the compositions of available formulas and their cost-effectiveness were evaluated based on the clinical guidelines of scientific bodies such as American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) and relative articles available in PubMed. In addition, the expert opinions were also taken into consideration. Results: Domestic commercial formulas seemed to less merit dietary recommended intakes, i.e. the amount of some nutrients were much higher, and some others were much lower than the recommended values. The amount of several micronutrients including vitamins B1, B6, C, D and K, as well as iron, calcium and magnesium were not sufficient to meet the body needs in most commercial formulas upon receiving 2000 kilocalories and less. Conclusion: Clinical studies on the efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas are needed. Meanwhile, making suitable conditions for increasing the diversity of artificial nutrition products in the market would help clinical nutritionists to make better choices according to their patients conditions and to reduce the costs, as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5804464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58044642018-02-14 Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review Hassan-Ghomi, Majid Nikooyeh, Bahareh Motamed, Soudabeh R. Neyestani, Tirang Med J Islam Repub Iran Review Article Background: In several disease conditions, patients must inevitably be nourished by enteral feeding (EF). Though in many countries, commercial formulas are routinely used for EF, in Iran still home-made formulas are commonly employed as commercial formulas are not covered by insurance. This may pose patients to malnutrition and bring about further costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of EF commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas and thus to make further evidence for insurance policy-making Methods: Medline, Cochrane, Embass and Center for Review & Dissemination (CRD) as well as IranDoc and SID databases were searched. Keywords included formula, ICU, and enteral nutrition or tube feeding. No clinical trial study on the efficacy of EF formulas was found. Therefore, the compositions of available formulas and their cost-effectiveness were evaluated based on the clinical guidelines of scientific bodies such as American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) and relative articles available in PubMed. In addition, the expert opinions were also taken into consideration. Results: Domestic commercial formulas seemed to less merit dietary recommended intakes, i.e. the amount of some nutrients were much higher, and some others were much lower than the recommended values. The amount of several micronutrients including vitamins B1, B6, C, D and K, as well as iron, calcium and magnesium were not sufficient to meet the body needs in most commercial formulas upon receiving 2000 kilocalories and less. Conclusion: Clinical studies on the efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas are needed. Meanwhile, making suitable conditions for increasing the diversity of artificial nutrition products in the market would help clinical nutritionists to make better choices according to their patients conditions and to reduce the costs, as well. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2017-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5804464/ /pubmed/29445684 http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.31.55 Text en © 2017 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hassan-Ghomi, Majid
Nikooyeh, Bahareh
Motamed, Soudabeh
R. Neyestani, Tirang
Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review
title Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review
title_full Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review
title_fullStr Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review
title_short Efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: A critical review
title_sort efficacy of commercial formulas in comparison with home-made formulas for enteral feeding: a critical review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445684
http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.31.55
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanghomimajid efficacyofcommercialformulasincomparisonwithhomemadeformulasforenteralfeedingacriticalreview
AT nikooyehbahareh efficacyofcommercialformulasincomparisonwithhomemadeformulasforenteralfeedingacriticalreview
AT motamedsoudabeh efficacyofcommercialformulasincomparisonwithhomemadeformulasforenteralfeedingacriticalreview
AT rneyestanitirang efficacyofcommercialformulasincomparisonwithhomemadeformulasforenteralfeedingacriticalreview