Cargando…
Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications
Overdiagnosis is the diagnosis of an abnormality that bears no substantial health hazard and no benefit for patients to be aware of. Resulting mainly from the use of increasingly sensitive screening and diagnostic tests, as well as broadened definitions of conditions requiring an intervention, overd...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-015-0012-1 |
_version_ | 1783298858746380288 |
---|---|
author | Bulliard, Jean-Luc Chiolero, Arnaud |
author_facet | Bulliard, Jean-Luc Chiolero, Arnaud |
author_sort | Bulliard, Jean-Luc |
collection | PubMed |
description | Overdiagnosis is the diagnosis of an abnormality that bears no substantial health hazard and no benefit for patients to be aware of. Resulting mainly from the use of increasingly sensitive screening and diagnostic tests, as well as broadened definitions of conditions requiring an intervention, overdiagnosis is a growing but still largely misunderstood public health issue. Fear of missing a diagnosis or of litigation, financial incentives or patient’s need of reassurance are further causes of overdiagnosis. The main consequence of overdiagnosis is overtreatment. Treating an overdiagnosed condition bears no benefit but can cause harms and generates costs. Overtreatment also diverts health professionals from caring for those most severely ill. Recognition of overdiagnosis due to screening is challenging since it is rarely identifiable at the individual level and difficult to quantify precisely at the population level. Overdiagnosis exists even for screening of proven efficacy and efficiency. Measures to reduce overdiagnosis due to screening include heightened sensitization of health professionals and patients, active surveillance and deferred treatment until early signs of disease progression and prognosis estimation through biomarkers (including molecular) profiling. Targeted screening and balanced information on its risk and benefits would also help limit overdiagnosis. Research is needed to assess the public health burden and implications of overdiagnosis due to screening activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5804493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58044932018-02-15 Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications Bulliard, Jean-Luc Chiolero, Arnaud Public Health Rev Commentary Overdiagnosis is the diagnosis of an abnormality that bears no substantial health hazard and no benefit for patients to be aware of. Resulting mainly from the use of increasingly sensitive screening and diagnostic tests, as well as broadened definitions of conditions requiring an intervention, overdiagnosis is a growing but still largely misunderstood public health issue. Fear of missing a diagnosis or of litigation, financial incentives or patient’s need of reassurance are further causes of overdiagnosis. The main consequence of overdiagnosis is overtreatment. Treating an overdiagnosed condition bears no benefit but can cause harms and generates costs. Overtreatment also diverts health professionals from caring for those most severely ill. Recognition of overdiagnosis due to screening is challenging since it is rarely identifiable at the individual level and difficult to quantify precisely at the population level. Overdiagnosis exists even for screening of proven efficacy and efficiency. Measures to reduce overdiagnosis due to screening include heightened sensitization of health professionals and patients, active surveillance and deferred treatment until early signs of disease progression and prognosis estimation through biomarkers (including molecular) profiling. Targeted screening and balanced information on its risk and benefits would also help limit overdiagnosis. Research is needed to assess the public health burden and implications of overdiagnosis due to screening activity. BioMed Central 2015-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5804493/ /pubmed/29450036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-015-0012-1 Text en © Bulliard and Chiolero. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Bulliard, Jean-Luc Chiolero, Arnaud Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications |
title | Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications |
title_full | Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications |
title_fullStr | Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications |
title_short | Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications |
title_sort | screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-015-0012-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bulliardjeanluc screeningandoverdiagnosispublichealthimplications AT chioleroarnaud screeningandoverdiagnosispublichealthimplications |