Cargando…
What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers
STUDY OBJECTIVES: We conceptualized sleep quality judgment as a decision-making process and examined the relative importance of 17 parameters of sleep quality using a choice-based conjoint analysis. METHODS: One hundred participants (50 good sleepers; 50 poor sleepers) were asked to choose between 2...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx091 |
_version_ | 1783298903304568832 |
---|---|
author | Ramlee, Fatanah Sanborn, Adam N. Tang, Nicole K. Y. |
author_facet | Ramlee, Fatanah Sanborn, Adam N. Tang, Nicole K. Y. |
author_sort | Ramlee, Fatanah |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY OBJECTIVES: We conceptualized sleep quality judgment as a decision-making process and examined the relative importance of 17 parameters of sleep quality using a choice-based conjoint analysis. METHODS: One hundred participants (50 good sleepers; 50 poor sleepers) were asked to choose between 2 written scenarios to answer 1 of 2 questions: “Which describes a better (or worse) night of sleep?”. Each scenario described a self-reported experience of sleep, stringing together 17 possible determinants of sleep quality that occur at different times of the day (day before, pre-sleep, during sleep, upon waking, day after). Each participant answered 48 questions. Logistic regression models were fit to their choice data. RESULTS: Eleven of the 17 sleep quality parameters had a significant impact on the participants’ choices. The top 3 determinants of sleep quality were: Total sleep time, feeling refreshed (upon waking), and mood (day after). Sleep quality judgments were most influenced by factors that occur during sleep, followed by feelings and activities upon waking and the day after. There was a significant interaction between wake after sleep onset and feeling refreshed (upon waking) and between feeling refreshed (upon waking) and question type (better or worse night of sleep). Type of sleeper (good vs poor sleepers) did not significantly influence the judgments. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quality judgments appear to be determined by not only what happened during sleep, but also what happened after the sleep period. Interventions that improve mood and functioning during the day may inadvertently also improve people’s self-reported evaluation of sleep quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5804994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58049942018-02-23 What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers Ramlee, Fatanah Sanborn, Adam N. Tang, Nicole K. Y. Sleep Original Article STUDY OBJECTIVES: We conceptualized sleep quality judgment as a decision-making process and examined the relative importance of 17 parameters of sleep quality using a choice-based conjoint analysis. METHODS: One hundred participants (50 good sleepers; 50 poor sleepers) were asked to choose between 2 written scenarios to answer 1 of 2 questions: “Which describes a better (or worse) night of sleep?”. Each scenario described a self-reported experience of sleep, stringing together 17 possible determinants of sleep quality that occur at different times of the day (day before, pre-sleep, during sleep, upon waking, day after). Each participant answered 48 questions. Logistic regression models were fit to their choice data. RESULTS: Eleven of the 17 sleep quality parameters had a significant impact on the participants’ choices. The top 3 determinants of sleep quality were: Total sleep time, feeling refreshed (upon waking), and mood (day after). Sleep quality judgments were most influenced by factors that occur during sleep, followed by feelings and activities upon waking and the day after. There was a significant interaction between wake after sleep onset and feeling refreshed (upon waking) and between feeling refreshed (upon waking) and question type (better or worse night of sleep). Type of sleeper (good vs poor sleepers) did not significantly influence the judgments. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quality judgments appear to be determined by not only what happened during sleep, but also what happened after the sleep period. Interventions that improve mood and functioning during the day may inadvertently also improve people’s self-reported evaluation of sleep quality. Oxford University Press 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5804994/ /pubmed/28525617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx091 Text en © Sleep Research Society 2017. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Sleep Research Society]. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ramlee, Fatanah Sanborn, Adam N. Tang, Nicole K. Y. What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers |
title | What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers |
title_full | What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers |
title_fullStr | What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers |
title_full_unstemmed | What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers |
title_short | What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers |
title_sort | what sways people’s judgment of sleep quality? a quantitative choice-making study with good and poor sleepers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramleefatanah whatswayspeoplesjudgmentofsleepqualityaquantitativechoicemakingstudywithgoodandpoorsleepers AT sanbornadamn whatswayspeoplesjudgmentofsleepqualityaquantitativechoicemakingstudywithgoodandpoorsleepers AT tangnicoleky whatswayspeoplesjudgmentofsleepqualityaquantitativechoicemakingstudywithgoodandpoorsleepers |