Cargando…

What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We conceptualized sleep quality judgment as a decision-making process and examined the relative importance of 17 parameters of sleep quality using a choice-based conjoint analysis. METHODS: One hundred participants (50 good sleepers; 50 poor sleepers) were asked to choose between 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramlee, Fatanah, Sanborn, Adam N., Tang, Nicole K. Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx091
_version_ 1783298903304568832
author Ramlee, Fatanah
Sanborn, Adam N.
Tang, Nicole K. Y.
author_facet Ramlee, Fatanah
Sanborn, Adam N.
Tang, Nicole K. Y.
author_sort Ramlee, Fatanah
collection PubMed
description STUDY OBJECTIVES: We conceptualized sleep quality judgment as a decision-making process and examined the relative importance of 17 parameters of sleep quality using a choice-based conjoint analysis. METHODS: One hundred participants (50 good sleepers; 50 poor sleepers) were asked to choose between 2 written scenarios to answer 1 of 2 questions: “Which describes a better (or worse) night of sleep?”. Each scenario described a self-reported experience of sleep, stringing together 17 possible determinants of sleep quality that occur at different times of the day (day before, pre-sleep, during sleep, upon waking, day after). Each participant answered 48 questions. Logistic regression models were fit to their choice data. RESULTS: Eleven of the 17 sleep quality parameters had a significant impact on the participants’ choices. The top 3 determinants of sleep quality were: Total sleep time, feeling refreshed (upon waking), and mood (day after). Sleep quality judgments were most influenced by factors that occur during sleep, followed by feelings and activities upon waking and the day after. There was a significant interaction between wake after sleep onset and feeling refreshed (upon waking) and between feeling refreshed (upon waking) and question type (better or worse night of sleep). Type of sleeper (good vs poor sleepers) did not significantly influence the judgments. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quality judgments appear to be determined by not only what happened during sleep, but also what happened after the sleep period. Interventions that improve mood and functioning during the day may inadvertently also improve people’s self-reported evaluation of sleep quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5804994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58049942018-02-23 What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers Ramlee, Fatanah Sanborn, Adam N. Tang, Nicole K. Y. Sleep Original Article STUDY OBJECTIVES: We conceptualized sleep quality judgment as a decision-making process and examined the relative importance of 17 parameters of sleep quality using a choice-based conjoint analysis. METHODS: One hundred participants (50 good sleepers; 50 poor sleepers) were asked to choose between 2 written scenarios to answer 1 of 2 questions: “Which describes a better (or worse) night of sleep?”. Each scenario described a self-reported experience of sleep, stringing together 17 possible determinants of sleep quality that occur at different times of the day (day before, pre-sleep, during sleep, upon waking, day after). Each participant answered 48 questions. Logistic regression models were fit to their choice data. RESULTS: Eleven of the 17 sleep quality parameters had a significant impact on the participants’ choices. The top 3 determinants of sleep quality were: Total sleep time, feeling refreshed (upon waking), and mood (day after). Sleep quality judgments were most influenced by factors that occur during sleep, followed by feelings and activities upon waking and the day after. There was a significant interaction between wake after sleep onset and feeling refreshed (upon waking) and between feeling refreshed (upon waking) and question type (better or worse night of sleep). Type of sleeper (good vs poor sleepers) did not significantly influence the judgments. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quality judgments appear to be determined by not only what happened during sleep, but also what happened after the sleep period. Interventions that improve mood and functioning during the day may inadvertently also improve people’s self-reported evaluation of sleep quality. Oxford University Press 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5804994/ /pubmed/28525617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx091 Text en © Sleep Research Society 2017. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Sleep Research Society]. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ramlee, Fatanah
Sanborn, Adam N.
Tang, Nicole K. Y.
What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers
title What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers
title_full What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers
title_fullStr What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers
title_full_unstemmed What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers
title_short What Sways People’s Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers
title_sort what sways people’s judgment of sleep quality? a quantitative choice-making study with good and poor sleepers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx091
work_keys_str_mv AT ramleefatanah whatswayspeoplesjudgmentofsleepqualityaquantitativechoicemakingstudywithgoodandpoorsleepers
AT sanbornadamn whatswayspeoplesjudgmentofsleepqualityaquantitativechoicemakingstudywithgoodandpoorsleepers
AT tangnicoleky whatswayspeoplesjudgmentofsleepqualityaquantitativechoicemakingstudywithgoodandpoorsleepers