Cargando…

Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy plays an active role in improving the quality-of-life (QoL) and alleviating the psychological trauma of breast cancer patients, and has become an indispensable part of the comprehensive treatment in breast cancer. However, compared with mastectomy alone, breast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Qinghong, Tan, Qixing, Lian, Bin, Mo, Qinguo, Huang, Zhen, Wei, Changyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29384865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009766
_version_ 1783298975138316288
author Qin, Qinghong
Tan, Qixing
Lian, Bin
Mo, Qinguo
Huang, Zhen
Wei, Changyuan
author_facet Qin, Qinghong
Tan, Qixing
Lian, Bin
Mo, Qinguo
Huang, Zhen
Wei, Changyuan
author_sort Qin, Qinghong
collection PubMed
description Breast reconstruction after mastectomy plays an active role in improving the quality-of-life (QoL) and alleviating the psychological trauma of breast cancer patients, and has become an indispensable part of the comprehensive treatment in breast cancer. However, compared with mastectomy alone, breast reconstruction also increase operative complications. The surgical, oncological outcomes, and cosmetic effect of breast reconstruction remains to be evaluated. Data for patients with breast cancer who underwent breast reconstruction after mastectomy from February 2009 to November 2015 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, with a median follow-up time of 44 months. The operating time, blood loss, drainage fluid, postoperative complications, postoperative cosmesis, oncological outcomes, and QoL were evaluated and compared between different reconstruction types. A total of 151 women were included. The flap-based group had higher complication rates of marginal necrosis of incision, while the incidence of capsular contracture was higher in immediate implant group. There was no difference in blood loss, drainage fluid, and other postoperative complications. Several independent factors were associated with increased postoperative complications included diabetic, obese, and reconstruction with flap. There was no significant difference in the disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate between different surgical groups. In terms of cosmetic effect, patients in the tissue expander group were more likely to get a satisfactory postoperative breast appearance. QoL outcomes shown that the tissue expander group has better body image and sexual enjoyment, while there was no significant difference for other QoL domains. In conclusion, different methods of breast reconstruction are safe and feasible for patients with breast cancer, tissue expander implantation following delayed implant breast reconstruction is a more effective treatment on cosmetic and QoL outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5805437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58054372018-02-20 Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study Qin, Qinghong Tan, Qixing Lian, Bin Mo, Qinguo Huang, Zhen Wei, Changyuan Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Breast reconstruction after mastectomy plays an active role in improving the quality-of-life (QoL) and alleviating the psychological trauma of breast cancer patients, and has become an indispensable part of the comprehensive treatment in breast cancer. However, compared with mastectomy alone, breast reconstruction also increase operative complications. The surgical, oncological outcomes, and cosmetic effect of breast reconstruction remains to be evaluated. Data for patients with breast cancer who underwent breast reconstruction after mastectomy from February 2009 to November 2015 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, with a median follow-up time of 44 months. The operating time, blood loss, drainage fluid, postoperative complications, postoperative cosmesis, oncological outcomes, and QoL were evaluated and compared between different reconstruction types. A total of 151 women were included. The flap-based group had higher complication rates of marginal necrosis of incision, while the incidence of capsular contracture was higher in immediate implant group. There was no difference in blood loss, drainage fluid, and other postoperative complications. Several independent factors were associated with increased postoperative complications included diabetic, obese, and reconstruction with flap. There was no significant difference in the disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate between different surgical groups. In terms of cosmetic effect, patients in the tissue expander group were more likely to get a satisfactory postoperative breast appearance. QoL outcomes shown that the tissue expander group has better body image and sexual enjoyment, while there was no significant difference for other QoL domains. In conclusion, different methods of breast reconstruction are safe and feasible for patients with breast cancer, tissue expander implantation following delayed implant breast reconstruction is a more effective treatment on cosmetic and QoL outcomes. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5805437/ /pubmed/29384865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009766 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Qin, Qinghong
Tan, Qixing
Lian, Bin
Mo, Qinguo
Huang, Zhen
Wei, Changyuan
Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study
title Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study
title_full Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study
title_fullStr Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study
title_short Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study
title_sort postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a retrospective study
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29384865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009766
work_keys_str_mv AT qinqinghong postoperativeoutcomesofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT tanqixing postoperativeoutcomesofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT lianbin postoperativeoutcomesofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT moqinguo postoperativeoutcomesofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT huangzhen postoperativeoutcomesofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT weichangyuan postoperativeoutcomesofbreastreconstructionaftermastectomyaretrospectivestudy