Cargando…
Challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have potential utility as a surrogate biomarker of tumor biology via a liquid biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the nCounter NanoString assay could be used for accurate gene expression profiling of CTCs using the PAM50 research-use-only CodeSet. Analysis...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467948 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24140 |
_version_ | 1783298990851227648 |
---|---|
author | Porras, Tania B. Kaur, Pushpinder Ring, Alexander Schechter, Naomi Lang, Julie E. |
author_facet | Porras, Tania B. Kaur, Pushpinder Ring, Alexander Schechter, Naomi Lang, Julie E. |
author_sort | Porras, Tania B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have potential utility as a surrogate biomarker of tumor biology via a liquid biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the nCounter NanoString assay could be used for accurate gene expression profiling of CTCs using the PAM50 research-use-only CodeSet. Analysis was performed on CTCs isolated by the ANGLE Parsortix system from healthy blood spiked with the breast cancer cell lines Hs578T, SkBr3, MDA-MB-231 or MCF7. Using cell lines as gold standard positive controls and Parsortix processed blood without spiking (unspiked) as negative controls, we found an average of 12 significantly differentially expressed genes among spiked samples versus unspiked controls. We validated our findings with the NanoStringDiff differential expression statistical method. The NanoString recommended targeted pre-amplification introduced false positive results due to pre-amplification bias, and the amplification of non-cancer genes from normal leukocytes confounded gene expression profiling of CTCs. Pre-amplification bias is a concern for other similar assays that may be used as discovery tools or target validation of transcripts of interest in gene expression profiling of CTCs. We recommend the use of an unspiked negative control when evaluating CTC technologies regarding gene expression profiling. Given that the molecular profiling of CTCs as a liquid biopsy may have clinical ramifications for potential treatment selection in future clinical trials, our study emphasizes cautious consideration of pre-analytical variables such as amplification bias in the context of liquid biopsy studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5805534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58055342018-02-21 Challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling Porras, Tania B. Kaur, Pushpinder Ring, Alexander Schechter, Naomi Lang, Julie E. Oncotarget Research Paper Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have potential utility as a surrogate biomarker of tumor biology via a liquid biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the nCounter NanoString assay could be used for accurate gene expression profiling of CTCs using the PAM50 research-use-only CodeSet. Analysis was performed on CTCs isolated by the ANGLE Parsortix system from healthy blood spiked with the breast cancer cell lines Hs578T, SkBr3, MDA-MB-231 or MCF7. Using cell lines as gold standard positive controls and Parsortix processed blood without spiking (unspiked) as negative controls, we found an average of 12 significantly differentially expressed genes among spiked samples versus unspiked controls. We validated our findings with the NanoStringDiff differential expression statistical method. The NanoString recommended targeted pre-amplification introduced false positive results due to pre-amplification bias, and the amplification of non-cancer genes from normal leukocytes confounded gene expression profiling of CTCs. Pre-amplification bias is a concern for other similar assays that may be used as discovery tools or target validation of transcripts of interest in gene expression profiling of CTCs. We recommend the use of an unspiked negative control when evaluating CTC technologies regarding gene expression profiling. Given that the molecular profiling of CTCs as a liquid biopsy may have clinical ramifications for potential treatment selection in future clinical trials, our study emphasizes cautious consideration of pre-analytical variables such as amplification bias in the context of liquid biopsy studies. Impact Journals LLC 2018-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5805534/ /pubmed/29467948 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24140 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Porras et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Porras, Tania B. Kaur, Pushpinder Ring, Alexander Schechter, Naomi Lang, Julie E. Challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling |
title | Challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling |
title_full | Challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling |
title_fullStr | Challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling |
title_short | Challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling |
title_sort | challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467948 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT porrastaniab challengesinusingliquidbiopsiesforgeneexpressionprofiling AT kaurpushpinder challengesinusingliquidbiopsiesforgeneexpressionprofiling AT ringalexander challengesinusingliquidbiopsiesforgeneexpressionprofiling AT schechternaomi challengesinusingliquidbiopsiesforgeneexpressionprofiling AT langjuliee challengesinusingliquidbiopsiesforgeneexpressionprofiling |