Cargando…

Vitamin D receptor Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

Numerous previous studies reported the association of Vitamin D receptor gene Taq Ipolymorphism with prostate cancer risk, however these results were controversial. In order to provide a relatively comprehensive description of this relationship, we conducted this meta-analysis by searching PubMed, E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Shaosan, Zhao, Yansheng, Wang, Lei, Liu, Jian, Chen, Xi, Liu, Xiaofeng, Shi, Zhijie, Gao, Weixing, Cao, Fenghong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467956
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23606
_version_ 1783298992750198784
author Kang, Shaosan
Zhao, Yansheng
Wang, Lei
Liu, Jian
Chen, Xi
Liu, Xiaofeng
Shi, Zhijie
Gao, Weixing
Cao, Fenghong
author_facet Kang, Shaosan
Zhao, Yansheng
Wang, Lei
Liu, Jian
Chen, Xi
Liu, Xiaofeng
Shi, Zhijie
Gao, Weixing
Cao, Fenghong
author_sort Kang, Shaosan
collection PubMed
description Numerous previous studies reported the association of Vitamin D receptor gene Taq Ipolymorphism with prostate cancer risk, however these results were controversial. In order to provide a relatively comprehensive description of this relationship, we conducted this meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Finally, 36 studies with 8,423 cases and 8,887 controls were included. Taq I polymorphism was found to marginally increase the prostate cancer risk in recessive genetic model (tt/Tt vs. TT: Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.89, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.80–1.00, p = 0.05) and allele genetic model (t vs. T allele: OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84–0.99, p = 0.003) in the overall analysis. Subgroup analyses showed that significant increased risk was found in Asians in homozygote model (tt vs. TT: OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.41–0.95, p = 0.029) and allele genetic model (t vs. T: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67–0.90, p = 0.002), and in the subgroup of population-based controls in all the genetic models. These results suggest that Taq Ipolymorphism might be a risk factor of prostate cancer risk, especially in Asians. It could be considered as a promising target to predict the prostate cancer risk for clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5805542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58055422018-02-21 Vitamin D receptor Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis Kang, Shaosan Zhao, Yansheng Wang, Lei Liu, Jian Chen, Xi Liu, Xiaofeng Shi, Zhijie Gao, Weixing Cao, Fenghong Oncotarget Meta-Analysis Numerous previous studies reported the association of Vitamin D receptor gene Taq Ipolymorphism with prostate cancer risk, however these results were controversial. In order to provide a relatively comprehensive description of this relationship, we conducted this meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Finally, 36 studies with 8,423 cases and 8,887 controls were included. Taq I polymorphism was found to marginally increase the prostate cancer risk in recessive genetic model (tt/Tt vs. TT: Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.89, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.80–1.00, p = 0.05) and allele genetic model (t vs. T allele: OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84–0.99, p = 0.003) in the overall analysis. Subgroup analyses showed that significant increased risk was found in Asians in homozygote model (tt vs. TT: OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.41–0.95, p = 0.029) and allele genetic model (t vs. T: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67–0.90, p = 0.002), and in the subgroup of population-based controls in all the genetic models. These results suggest that Taq Ipolymorphism might be a risk factor of prostate cancer risk, especially in Asians. It could be considered as a promising target to predict the prostate cancer risk for clinical practice. Impact Journals LLC 2017-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5805542/ /pubmed/29467956 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23606 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Kang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Kang, Shaosan
Zhao, Yansheng
Wang, Lei
Liu, Jian
Chen, Xi
Liu, Xiaofeng
Shi, Zhijie
Gao, Weixing
Cao, Fenghong
Vitamin D receptor Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title Vitamin D receptor Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full Vitamin D receptor Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Vitamin D receptor Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vitamin D receptor Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title_short Vitamin D receptor Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
title_sort vitamin d receptor taq i polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467956
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23606
work_keys_str_mv AT kangshaosan vitamindreceptortaqipolymorphismandtheriskofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT zhaoyansheng vitamindreceptortaqipolymorphismandtheriskofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT wanglei vitamindreceptortaqipolymorphismandtheriskofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT liujian vitamindreceptortaqipolymorphismandtheriskofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT chenxi vitamindreceptortaqipolymorphismandtheriskofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT liuxiaofeng vitamindreceptortaqipolymorphismandtheriskofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT shizhijie vitamindreceptortaqipolymorphismandtheriskofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT gaoweixing vitamindreceptortaqipolymorphismandtheriskofprostatecancerametaanalysis
AT caofenghong vitamindreceptortaqipolymorphismandtheriskofprostatecancerametaanalysis