Cargando…
Clinical care review systems in healthcare: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Clinical care review is the process of retrospectively examining potential errors or gaps in medical care, aiming for future practice improvement. The objective of our systematic review is to identify the current state of care review reported in peer-reviewed publications and to identify...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-018-0166-y |
_version_ | 1783298998417752064 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Laura E. Nestler, David M. Laack, Torrey A. Clements, Casey M. Erwin, Patricia J. Scanlan-Hanson, Lori Bellolio, M. Fernanda |
author_facet | Walker, Laura E. Nestler, David M. Laack, Torrey A. Clements, Casey M. Erwin, Patricia J. Scanlan-Hanson, Lori Bellolio, M. Fernanda |
author_sort | Walker, Laura E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical care review is the process of retrospectively examining potential errors or gaps in medical care, aiming for future practice improvement. The objective of our systematic review is to identify the current state of care review reported in peer-reviewed publications and to identify domains that contribute to successful systems of care review. METHODS: A librarian designed and conducted a comprehensive literature search of eight electronic databases. We evaluated publications from January 1, 2000, through May 31, 2016, and identified common domains for care review. Sixteen domains were identified for further abstraction. RESULTS: We found that there were few publications that described a comprehensive care review system and more focus on individual pathways within the overall systems. There is inconsistent inclusion of the identified domains of care review. CONCLUSION: While guidelines for some aspects of care review exist and have gained traction, there is no comprehensive standardized process for care review with widespread implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12245-018-0166-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5805667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58056672018-02-14 Clinical care review systems in healthcare: a systematic review Walker, Laura E. Nestler, David M. Laack, Torrey A. Clements, Casey M. Erwin, Patricia J. Scanlan-Hanson, Lori Bellolio, M. Fernanda Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Clinical care review is the process of retrospectively examining potential errors or gaps in medical care, aiming for future practice improvement. The objective of our systematic review is to identify the current state of care review reported in peer-reviewed publications and to identify domains that contribute to successful systems of care review. METHODS: A librarian designed and conducted a comprehensive literature search of eight electronic databases. We evaluated publications from January 1, 2000, through May 31, 2016, and identified common domains for care review. Sixteen domains were identified for further abstraction. RESULTS: We found that there were few publications that described a comprehensive care review system and more focus on individual pathways within the overall systems. There is inconsistent inclusion of the identified domains of care review. CONCLUSION: While guidelines for some aspects of care review exist and have gained traction, there is no comprehensive standardized process for care review with widespread implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12245-018-0166-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5805667/ /pubmed/29423602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-018-0166-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Walker, Laura E. Nestler, David M. Laack, Torrey A. Clements, Casey M. Erwin, Patricia J. Scanlan-Hanson, Lori Bellolio, M. Fernanda Clinical care review systems in healthcare: a systematic review |
title | Clinical care review systems in healthcare: a systematic review |
title_full | Clinical care review systems in healthcare: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Clinical care review systems in healthcare: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical care review systems in healthcare: a systematic review |
title_short | Clinical care review systems in healthcare: a systematic review |
title_sort | clinical care review systems in healthcare: a systematic review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-018-0166-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkerlaurae clinicalcarereviewsystemsinhealthcareasystematicreview AT nestlerdavidm clinicalcarereviewsystemsinhealthcareasystematicreview AT laacktorreya clinicalcarereviewsystemsinhealthcareasystematicreview AT clementscaseym clinicalcarereviewsystemsinhealthcareasystematicreview AT erwinpatriciaj clinicalcarereviewsystemsinhealthcareasystematicreview AT scanlanhansonlori clinicalcarereviewsystemsinhealthcareasystematicreview AT belloliomfernanda clinicalcarereviewsystemsinhealthcareasystematicreview |