Cargando…
Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
BACKGROUND: The EORTC QLU-C10D is a new multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the widely used cancer-specific quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30. The QLU-C10D contains ten dimensions (Physical, Role, Social and Emotional Functioning; Pain, Fatigue, Sleep, Appetite, Nausea,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5 |
_version_ | 1783299034039975936 |
---|---|
author | King, Madeleine T. Viney, Rosalie Simon Pickard, A. Rowen, Donna Aaronson, Neil K. Brazier, John E. Cella, David Costa, Daniel S. J. Fayers, Peter M. Kemmler, Georg McTaggart-Cowen, Helen Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca Peacock, Stuart Street, Deborah J. Young, Tracey A. Norman, Richard |
author_facet | King, Madeleine T. Viney, Rosalie Simon Pickard, A. Rowen, Donna Aaronson, Neil K. Brazier, John E. Cella, David Costa, Daniel S. J. Fayers, Peter M. Kemmler, Georg McTaggart-Cowen, Helen Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca Peacock, Stuart Street, Deborah J. Young, Tracey A. Norman, Richard |
author_sort | King, Madeleine T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The EORTC QLU-C10D is a new multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the widely used cancer-specific quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30. The QLU-C10D contains ten dimensions (Physical, Role, Social and Emotional Functioning; Pain, Fatigue, Sleep, Appetite, Nausea, Bowel Problems), each with four levels. To be used in cost-utility analysis, country-specific valuation sets are required. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide Australian utility weights for the QLU-C10D. METHODS: An Australian online panel was quota-sampled to ensure population representativeness by sex and age (≥ 18 years). Participants completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) consisting of 16 choice-pairs. Each pair comprised two QLU-C10D health states plus life expectancy. Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression, parameterised to fit the quality-adjusted life-year framework. Utility weights were calculated as the ratio of each QOL dimension-level coefficient to the coefficient on life expectancy. RESULTS: A total of 1979 panel members opted in, 1904 (96%) completed at least one choice-pair, and 1846 (93%) completed all 16 choice-pairs. Dimension weights were generally monotonic: poorer levels within each dimension were generally associated with greater utility decrements. The dimensions that impacted most on choice were, in order, Physical Functioning, Pain, Role Functioning and Emotional Functioning. Oncology-relevant dimensions with moderate impact were Nausea and Bowel Problems. Fatigue, Trouble Sleeping and Appetite had relatively small impact. The value of the worst health state was -0.096, somewhat worse than death. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first country-specific value set for the QLU-C10D, which can facilitate cost-utility analyses when applied to data collected with the EORTC QLQ-C30, prospectively and retrospectively. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5805814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58058142018-02-14 Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 King, Madeleine T. Viney, Rosalie Simon Pickard, A. Rowen, Donna Aaronson, Neil K. Brazier, John E. Cella, David Costa, Daniel S. J. Fayers, Peter M. Kemmler, Georg McTaggart-Cowen, Helen Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca Peacock, Stuart Street, Deborah J. Young, Tracey A. Norman, Richard Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The EORTC QLU-C10D is a new multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the widely used cancer-specific quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30. The QLU-C10D contains ten dimensions (Physical, Role, Social and Emotional Functioning; Pain, Fatigue, Sleep, Appetite, Nausea, Bowel Problems), each with four levels. To be used in cost-utility analysis, country-specific valuation sets are required. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide Australian utility weights for the QLU-C10D. METHODS: An Australian online panel was quota-sampled to ensure population representativeness by sex and age (≥ 18 years). Participants completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) consisting of 16 choice-pairs. Each pair comprised two QLU-C10D health states plus life expectancy. Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression, parameterised to fit the quality-adjusted life-year framework. Utility weights were calculated as the ratio of each QOL dimension-level coefficient to the coefficient on life expectancy. RESULTS: A total of 1979 panel members opted in, 1904 (96%) completed at least one choice-pair, and 1846 (93%) completed all 16 choice-pairs. Dimension weights were generally monotonic: poorer levels within each dimension were generally associated with greater utility decrements. The dimensions that impacted most on choice were, in order, Physical Functioning, Pain, Role Functioning and Emotional Functioning. Oncology-relevant dimensions with moderate impact were Nausea and Bowel Problems. Fatigue, Trouble Sleeping and Appetite had relatively small impact. The value of the worst health state was -0.096, somewhat worse than death. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first country-specific value set for the QLU-C10D, which can facilitate cost-utility analyses when applied to data collected with the EORTC QLQ-C30, prospectively and retrospectively. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-12-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5805814/ /pubmed/29270835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article King, Madeleine T. Viney, Rosalie Simon Pickard, A. Rowen, Donna Aaronson, Neil K. Brazier, John E. Cella, David Costa, Daniel S. J. Fayers, Peter M. Kemmler, Georg McTaggart-Cowen, Helen Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca Peacock, Stuart Street, Deborah J. Young, Tracey A. Norman, Richard Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 |
title | Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 |
title_full | Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 |
title_fullStr | Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 |
title_full_unstemmed | Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 |
title_short | Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 |
title_sort | australian utility weights for the eortc qlu-c10d, a multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire, eortc qlq-c30 |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kingmadeleinet australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT vineyrosalie australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT simonpickarda australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT rowendonna australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT aaronsonneilk australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT brazierjohne australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT celladavid australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT costadanielsj australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT fayerspeterm australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT kemmlergeorg australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT mctaggartcowenhelen australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT merciecabebberrebecca australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT peacockstuart australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT streetdeborahj australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT youngtraceya australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT normanrichard australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 AT australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30 |