Cargando…

Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30

BACKGROUND: The EORTC QLU-C10D is a new multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the widely used cancer-specific quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30. The QLU-C10D contains ten dimensions (Physical, Role, Social and Emotional Functioning; Pain, Fatigue, Sleep, Appetite, Nausea,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, Madeleine T., Viney, Rosalie, Simon Pickard, A., Rowen, Donna, Aaronson, Neil K., Brazier, John E., Cella, David, Costa, Daniel S. J., Fayers, Peter M., Kemmler, Georg, McTaggart-Cowen, Helen, Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca, Peacock, Stuart, Street, Deborah J., Young, Tracey A., Norman, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5
_version_ 1783299034039975936
author King, Madeleine T.
Viney, Rosalie
Simon Pickard, A.
Rowen, Donna
Aaronson, Neil K.
Brazier, John E.
Cella, David
Costa, Daniel S. J.
Fayers, Peter M.
Kemmler, Georg
McTaggart-Cowen, Helen
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
Peacock, Stuart
Street, Deborah J.
Young, Tracey A.
Norman, Richard
author_facet King, Madeleine T.
Viney, Rosalie
Simon Pickard, A.
Rowen, Donna
Aaronson, Neil K.
Brazier, John E.
Cella, David
Costa, Daniel S. J.
Fayers, Peter M.
Kemmler, Georg
McTaggart-Cowen, Helen
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
Peacock, Stuart
Street, Deborah J.
Young, Tracey A.
Norman, Richard
author_sort King, Madeleine T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The EORTC QLU-C10D is a new multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the widely used cancer-specific quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30. The QLU-C10D contains ten dimensions (Physical, Role, Social and Emotional Functioning; Pain, Fatigue, Sleep, Appetite, Nausea, Bowel Problems), each with four levels. To be used in cost-utility analysis, country-specific valuation sets are required. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide Australian utility weights for the QLU-C10D. METHODS: An Australian online panel was quota-sampled to ensure population representativeness by sex and age (≥ 18 years). Participants completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) consisting of 16 choice-pairs. Each pair comprised two QLU-C10D health states plus life expectancy. Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression, parameterised to fit the quality-adjusted life-year framework. Utility weights were calculated as the ratio of each QOL dimension-level coefficient to the coefficient on life expectancy. RESULTS: A total of 1979 panel members opted in, 1904 (96%) completed at least one choice-pair, and 1846 (93%) completed all 16 choice-pairs. Dimension weights were generally monotonic: poorer levels within each dimension were generally associated with greater utility decrements. The dimensions that impacted most on choice were, in order, Physical Functioning, Pain, Role Functioning and Emotional Functioning. Oncology-relevant dimensions with moderate impact were Nausea and Bowel Problems. Fatigue, Trouble Sleeping and Appetite had relatively small impact. The value of the worst health state was -0.096, somewhat worse than death. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first country-specific value set for the QLU-C10D, which can facilitate cost-utility analyses when applied to data collected with the EORTC QLQ-C30, prospectively and retrospectively. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5805814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58058142018-02-14 Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 King, Madeleine T. Viney, Rosalie Simon Pickard, A. Rowen, Donna Aaronson, Neil K. Brazier, John E. Cella, David Costa, Daniel S. J. Fayers, Peter M. Kemmler, Georg McTaggart-Cowen, Helen Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca Peacock, Stuart Street, Deborah J. Young, Tracey A. Norman, Richard Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The EORTC QLU-C10D is a new multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the widely used cancer-specific quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30. The QLU-C10D contains ten dimensions (Physical, Role, Social and Emotional Functioning; Pain, Fatigue, Sleep, Appetite, Nausea, Bowel Problems), each with four levels. To be used in cost-utility analysis, country-specific valuation sets are required. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide Australian utility weights for the QLU-C10D. METHODS: An Australian online panel was quota-sampled to ensure population representativeness by sex and age (≥ 18 years). Participants completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) consisting of 16 choice-pairs. Each pair comprised two QLU-C10D health states plus life expectancy. Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression, parameterised to fit the quality-adjusted life-year framework. Utility weights were calculated as the ratio of each QOL dimension-level coefficient to the coefficient on life expectancy. RESULTS: A total of 1979 panel members opted in, 1904 (96%) completed at least one choice-pair, and 1846 (93%) completed all 16 choice-pairs. Dimension weights were generally monotonic: poorer levels within each dimension were generally associated with greater utility decrements. The dimensions that impacted most on choice were, in order, Physical Functioning, Pain, Role Functioning and Emotional Functioning. Oncology-relevant dimensions with moderate impact were Nausea and Bowel Problems. Fatigue, Trouble Sleeping and Appetite had relatively small impact. The value of the worst health state was -0.096, somewhat worse than death. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first country-specific value set for the QLU-C10D, which can facilitate cost-utility analyses when applied to data collected with the EORTC QLQ-C30, prospectively and retrospectively. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-12-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5805814/ /pubmed/29270835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
King, Madeleine T.
Viney, Rosalie
Simon Pickard, A.
Rowen, Donna
Aaronson, Neil K.
Brazier, John E.
Cella, David
Costa, Daniel S. J.
Fayers, Peter M.
Kemmler, Georg
McTaggart-Cowen, Helen
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
Peacock, Stuart
Street, Deborah J.
Young, Tracey A.
Norman, Richard
Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
title Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
title_full Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
title_fullStr Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
title_full_unstemmed Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
title_short Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
title_sort australian utility weights for the eortc qlu-c10d, a multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire, eortc qlq-c30
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kingmadeleinet australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT vineyrosalie australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT simonpickarda australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT rowendonna australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT aaronsonneilk australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT brazierjohne australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT celladavid australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT costadanielsj australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT fayerspeterm australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT kemmlergeorg australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT mctaggartcowenhelen australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT merciecabebberrebecca australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT peacockstuart australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT streetdeborahj australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT youngtraceya australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT normanrichard australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30
AT australianutilityweightsfortheeortcqluc10damultiattributeutilityinstrumentderivedfromthecancerspecificqualityoflifequestionnaireeortcqlqc30