Cargando…
tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
BACKGROUND: Measurements and models of current flow in the brain during transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) indicate stimulation of regions in-between electrodes. Moreover, the folded cortex results in local fluctuations in current flow intensity and direction, and animal studies suggest...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29146468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.001 |
_version_ | 1783299035691483136 |
---|---|
author | Rawji, Vishal Ciocca, Matteo Zacharia, André Soares, David Truong, Dennis Bikson, Marom Rothwell, John Bestmann, Sven |
author_facet | Rawji, Vishal Ciocca, Matteo Zacharia, André Soares, David Truong, Dennis Bikson, Marom Rothwell, John Bestmann, Sven |
author_sort | Rawji, Vishal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Measurements and models of current flow in the brain during transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) indicate stimulation of regions in-between electrodes. Moreover, the folded cortex results in local fluctuations in current flow intensity and direction, and animal studies suggest current flow direction relative to cortical columns determines response to tDCS. METHODS: Here we test this idea by using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Evoked Potentials (TMS-MEP) to measure changes in corticospinal excitability following tDCS applied with electrodes aligned orthogonal (across) or parallel to M1 in the central sulcus. RESULTS: Current flow models predicted that the orthogonal electrode montage produces consistently oriented current across the hand region of M1 that flows along cortical columns, while the parallel electrode montage produces non-uniform current directions across the M1 cortical surface. We find that orthogonal, but not parallel, orientated tDCS modulates TMS-MEPs. We also show modulation is sensitive to the orientation of the TMS coil (PA or AP), which is thought to select different afferent pathways to M1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with tDCS producing directionally specific neuromodulation in brain regions in-between electrodes, but shows nuanced changes in excitability that are presumably current direction relative to column and axon pathway specific. We suggest that the direction of current flow through cortical target regions should be considered for targeting and dose-control of tDCS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5805821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58058212018-03-01 tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow Rawji, Vishal Ciocca, Matteo Zacharia, André Soares, David Truong, Dennis Bikson, Marom Rothwell, John Bestmann, Sven Brain Stimul Article BACKGROUND: Measurements and models of current flow in the brain during transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) indicate stimulation of regions in-between electrodes. Moreover, the folded cortex results in local fluctuations in current flow intensity and direction, and animal studies suggest current flow direction relative to cortical columns determines response to tDCS. METHODS: Here we test this idea by using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Evoked Potentials (TMS-MEP) to measure changes in corticospinal excitability following tDCS applied with electrodes aligned orthogonal (across) or parallel to M1 in the central sulcus. RESULTS: Current flow models predicted that the orthogonal electrode montage produces consistently oriented current across the hand region of M1 that flows along cortical columns, while the parallel electrode montage produces non-uniform current directions across the M1 cortical surface. We find that orthogonal, but not parallel, orientated tDCS modulates TMS-MEPs. We also show modulation is sensitive to the orientation of the TMS coil (PA or AP), which is thought to select different afferent pathways to M1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with tDCS producing directionally specific neuromodulation in brain regions in-between electrodes, but shows nuanced changes in excitability that are presumably current direction relative to column and axon pathway specific. We suggest that the direction of current flow through cortical target regions should be considered for targeting and dose-control of tDCS. Elsevier 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5805821/ /pubmed/29146468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.001 Text en Crown Copyright © 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rawji, Vishal Ciocca, Matteo Zacharia, André Soares, David Truong, Dennis Bikson, Marom Rothwell, John Bestmann, Sven tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow |
title | tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow |
title_full | tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow |
title_fullStr | tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow |
title_full_unstemmed | tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow |
title_short | tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow |
title_sort | tdcs changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29146468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rawjivishal tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow AT cioccamatteo tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow AT zachariaandre tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow AT soaresdavid tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow AT truongdennis tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow AT biksonmarom tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow AT rothwelljohn tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow AT bestmannsven tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow |