Cargando…

tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow

BACKGROUND: Measurements and models of current flow in the brain during transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) indicate stimulation of regions in-between electrodes. Moreover, the folded cortex results in local fluctuations in current flow intensity and direction, and animal studies suggest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rawji, Vishal, Ciocca, Matteo, Zacharia, André, Soares, David, Truong, Dennis, Bikson, Marom, Rothwell, John, Bestmann, Sven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29146468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.001
_version_ 1783299035691483136
author Rawji, Vishal
Ciocca, Matteo
Zacharia, André
Soares, David
Truong, Dennis
Bikson, Marom
Rothwell, John
Bestmann, Sven
author_facet Rawji, Vishal
Ciocca, Matteo
Zacharia, André
Soares, David
Truong, Dennis
Bikson, Marom
Rothwell, John
Bestmann, Sven
author_sort Rawji, Vishal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Measurements and models of current flow in the brain during transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) indicate stimulation of regions in-between electrodes. Moreover, the folded cortex results in local fluctuations in current flow intensity and direction, and animal studies suggest current flow direction relative to cortical columns determines response to tDCS. METHODS: Here we test this idea by using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Evoked Potentials (TMS-MEP) to measure changes in corticospinal excitability following tDCS applied with electrodes aligned orthogonal (across) or parallel to M1 in the central sulcus. RESULTS: Current flow models predicted that the orthogonal electrode montage produces consistently oriented current across the hand region of M1 that flows along cortical columns, while the parallel electrode montage produces non-uniform current directions across the M1 cortical surface. We find that orthogonal, but not parallel, orientated tDCS modulates TMS-MEPs. We also show modulation is sensitive to the orientation of the TMS coil (PA or AP), which is thought to select different afferent pathways to M1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with tDCS producing directionally specific neuromodulation in brain regions in-between electrodes, but shows nuanced changes in excitability that are presumably current direction relative to column and axon pathway specific. We suggest that the direction of current flow through cortical target regions should be considered for targeting and dose-control of tDCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5805821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58058212018-03-01 tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow Rawji, Vishal Ciocca, Matteo Zacharia, André Soares, David Truong, Dennis Bikson, Marom Rothwell, John Bestmann, Sven Brain Stimul Article BACKGROUND: Measurements and models of current flow in the brain during transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) indicate stimulation of regions in-between electrodes. Moreover, the folded cortex results in local fluctuations in current flow intensity and direction, and animal studies suggest current flow direction relative to cortical columns determines response to tDCS. METHODS: Here we test this idea by using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Evoked Potentials (TMS-MEP) to measure changes in corticospinal excitability following tDCS applied with electrodes aligned orthogonal (across) or parallel to M1 in the central sulcus. RESULTS: Current flow models predicted that the orthogonal electrode montage produces consistently oriented current across the hand region of M1 that flows along cortical columns, while the parallel electrode montage produces non-uniform current directions across the M1 cortical surface. We find that orthogonal, but not parallel, orientated tDCS modulates TMS-MEPs. We also show modulation is sensitive to the orientation of the TMS coil (PA or AP), which is thought to select different afferent pathways to M1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with tDCS producing directionally specific neuromodulation in brain regions in-between electrodes, but shows nuanced changes in excitability that are presumably current direction relative to column and axon pathway specific. We suggest that the direction of current flow through cortical target regions should be considered for targeting and dose-control of tDCS. Elsevier 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5805821/ /pubmed/29146468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.001 Text en Crown Copyright © 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rawji, Vishal
Ciocca, Matteo
Zacharia, André
Soares, David
Truong, Dennis
Bikson, Marom
Rothwell, John
Bestmann, Sven
tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
title tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
title_full tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
title_fullStr tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
title_full_unstemmed tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
title_short tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
title_sort tdcs changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29146468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT rawjivishal tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow
AT cioccamatteo tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow
AT zachariaandre tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow
AT soaresdavid tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow
AT truongdennis tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow
AT biksonmarom tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow
AT rothwelljohn tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow
AT bestmannsven tdcschangesinmotorexcitabilityarespecifictoorientationofcurrentflow