Cargando…

Understanding heterogeneities in mosquito-bite exposure and infection distributions for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis

It is well known that individuals in the same community can be exposed to a highly variable number of mosquito bites. This heterogeneity in bite exposure has consequences for the control of vector-borne diseases because a few people may be contributing significantly to transmission. However, very fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irvine, Michael A., Kazura, James W., Hollingsworth, T. Deirdre, Reimer, Lisa J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29386362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2253
_version_ 1783299054059388928
author Irvine, Michael A.
Kazura, James W.
Hollingsworth, T. Deirdre
Reimer, Lisa J.
author_facet Irvine, Michael A.
Kazura, James W.
Hollingsworth, T. Deirdre
Reimer, Lisa J.
author_sort Irvine, Michael A.
collection PubMed
description It is well known that individuals in the same community can be exposed to a highly variable number of mosquito bites. This heterogeneity in bite exposure has consequences for the control of vector-borne diseases because a few people may be contributing significantly to transmission. However, very few studies measure sources of heterogeneity in a way which is relevant to decision-making. We investigate the relationship between two classic measures of heterogeneity, spatial and individual, within the context of lymphatic filariasis, a parasitic mosquito-borne disease. Using infection and mosquito-bite data for five villages in Papua New Guinea, we measure biting characteristics to model what impact bed-nets have had on control of the disease. We combine this analysis with geospatial modelling to understand the spatial relationship between disease indicators and nightly mosquito bites. We found a weak association between biting and infection heterogeneity within villages. The introduction of bed-nets increased biting heterogeneity, but the reduction in mean biting more than compensated for this, by reducing prevalence closer to elimination thresholds. Nightly biting was explained by a spatial heterogeneity model, while parasite load was better explained by an individual heterogeneity model. Spatial and individual heterogeneity are qualitatively different with profoundly different policy implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5805933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58059332018-02-13 Understanding heterogeneities in mosquito-bite exposure and infection distributions for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis Irvine, Michael A. Kazura, James W. Hollingsworth, T. Deirdre Reimer, Lisa J. Proc Biol Sci Ecology It is well known that individuals in the same community can be exposed to a highly variable number of mosquito bites. This heterogeneity in bite exposure has consequences for the control of vector-borne diseases because a few people may be contributing significantly to transmission. However, very few studies measure sources of heterogeneity in a way which is relevant to decision-making. We investigate the relationship between two classic measures of heterogeneity, spatial and individual, within the context of lymphatic filariasis, a parasitic mosquito-borne disease. Using infection and mosquito-bite data for five villages in Papua New Guinea, we measure biting characteristics to model what impact bed-nets have had on control of the disease. We combine this analysis with geospatial modelling to understand the spatial relationship between disease indicators and nightly mosquito bites. We found a weak association between biting and infection heterogeneity within villages. The introduction of bed-nets increased biting heterogeneity, but the reduction in mean biting more than compensated for this, by reducing prevalence closer to elimination thresholds. Nightly biting was explained by a spatial heterogeneity model, while parasite load was better explained by an individual heterogeneity model. Spatial and individual heterogeneity are qualitatively different with profoundly different policy implications. The Royal Society 2018-01-31 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5805933/ /pubmed/29386362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2253 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Irvine, Michael A.
Kazura, James W.
Hollingsworth, T. Deirdre
Reimer, Lisa J.
Understanding heterogeneities in mosquito-bite exposure and infection distributions for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis
title Understanding heterogeneities in mosquito-bite exposure and infection distributions for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis
title_full Understanding heterogeneities in mosquito-bite exposure and infection distributions for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis
title_fullStr Understanding heterogeneities in mosquito-bite exposure and infection distributions for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis
title_full_unstemmed Understanding heterogeneities in mosquito-bite exposure and infection distributions for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis
title_short Understanding heterogeneities in mosquito-bite exposure and infection distributions for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis
title_sort understanding heterogeneities in mosquito-bite exposure and infection distributions for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29386362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2253
work_keys_str_mv AT irvinemichaela understandingheterogeneitiesinmosquitobiteexposureandinfectiondistributionsfortheeliminationoflymphaticfilariasis
AT kazurajamesw understandingheterogeneitiesinmosquitobiteexposureandinfectiondistributionsfortheeliminationoflymphaticfilariasis
AT hollingsworthtdeirdre understandingheterogeneitiesinmosquitobiteexposureandinfectiondistributionsfortheeliminationoflymphaticfilariasis
AT reimerlisaj understandingheterogeneitiesinmosquitobiteexposureandinfectiondistributionsfortheeliminationoflymphaticfilariasis