Cargando…

Evaluating the Energetic Driving Force for Cocrystal Formation

[Image: see text] We present a periodic density functional theory study of the stability of 350 organic cocrystals relative to their pure single-component structures, the largest study of cocrystals yet performed with high-level computational methods. Our calculations demonstrate that cocrystals are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Christopher R., Day, Graeme M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01375
_version_ 1783299067860746240
author Taylor, Christopher R.
Day, Graeme M.
author_facet Taylor, Christopher R.
Day, Graeme M.
author_sort Taylor, Christopher R.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] We present a periodic density functional theory study of the stability of 350 organic cocrystals relative to their pure single-component structures, the largest study of cocrystals yet performed with high-level computational methods. Our calculations demonstrate that cocrystals are on average 8 kJ mol(–1) more stable than their constituent single-component structures and are very rarely (<5% of cases) less stable; cocrystallization is almost always a thermodynamically favorable process. We consider the variation in stability between different categories of systems—hydrogen-bonded, halogen-bonded, and weakly bound cocrystals—finding that, contrary to chemical intuition, the presence of hydrogen or halogen bond interactions is not necessarily a good predictor of stability. Finally, we investigate the correlation of the relative stability with simple chemical descriptors: changes in packing efficiency and hydrogen bond strength. We find some broad qualitative agreement with chemical intuition—more densely packed cocrystals with stronger hydrogen bonding tend to be more stable—but the relationship is weak, suggesting that such simple descriptors do not capture the complex balance of interactions driving cocrystallization. Our conclusions suggest that while cocrystallization is often a thermodynamically favorable process, it remains difficult to formulate general rules to guide synthesis, highlighting the continued importance of high-level computation in predicting and rationalizing such systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5806084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58060842018-02-12 Evaluating the Energetic Driving Force for Cocrystal Formation Taylor, Christopher R. Day, Graeme M. Cryst Growth Des [Image: see text] We present a periodic density functional theory study of the stability of 350 organic cocrystals relative to their pure single-component structures, the largest study of cocrystals yet performed with high-level computational methods. Our calculations demonstrate that cocrystals are on average 8 kJ mol(–1) more stable than their constituent single-component structures and are very rarely (<5% of cases) less stable; cocrystallization is almost always a thermodynamically favorable process. We consider the variation in stability between different categories of systems—hydrogen-bonded, halogen-bonded, and weakly bound cocrystals—finding that, contrary to chemical intuition, the presence of hydrogen or halogen bond interactions is not necessarily a good predictor of stability. Finally, we investigate the correlation of the relative stability with simple chemical descriptors: changes in packing efficiency and hydrogen bond strength. We find some broad qualitative agreement with chemical intuition—more densely packed cocrystals with stronger hydrogen bonding tend to be more stable—but the relationship is weak, suggesting that such simple descriptors do not capture the complex balance of interactions driving cocrystallization. Our conclusions suggest that while cocrystallization is often a thermodynamically favorable process, it remains difficult to formulate general rules to guide synthesis, highlighting the continued importance of high-level computation in predicting and rationalizing such systems. American Chemical Society 2017-12-13 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5806084/ /pubmed/29445316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01375 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Taylor, Christopher R.
Day, Graeme M.
Evaluating the Energetic Driving Force for Cocrystal Formation
title Evaluating the Energetic Driving Force for Cocrystal Formation
title_full Evaluating the Energetic Driving Force for Cocrystal Formation
title_fullStr Evaluating the Energetic Driving Force for Cocrystal Formation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Energetic Driving Force for Cocrystal Formation
title_short Evaluating the Energetic Driving Force for Cocrystal Formation
title_sort evaluating the energetic driving force for cocrystal formation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01375
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorchristopherr evaluatingtheenergeticdrivingforceforcocrystalformation
AT daygraemem evaluatingtheenergeticdrivingforceforcocrystalformation