Cargando…
Evaluation of a population-level strategy to promote tobacco treatment use among insured smokers: a pragmatic, randomized trial
BACKGROUND: Most smokers do not use evidence-based smoking cessation treatment. Increasing utilization of these services is an important public health goal. Health care systems and insurers are well positioned to support this goal within their patient populations. We tested whether a brief, mail-bas...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29422026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5119-0 |
_version_ | 1783299086953218048 |
---|---|
author | McClure, Jennifer B. Anderson, Melissa L. |
author_facet | McClure, Jennifer B. Anderson, Melissa L. |
author_sort | McClure, Jennifer B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most smokers do not use evidence-based smoking cessation treatment. Increasing utilization of these services is an important public health goal. Health care systems and insurers are well positioned to support this goal within their patient populations. We tested whether a brief, mail-based intervention increased utilization of tobacco cessation services among insured smokers. METHODS: Adult smokers were identified via automated health plan data and randomized to one of five treatment arms (n = 4767). Randomization was stratified by gender, age, and type of health plan coverage. Three arms received a letter containing motivational content and treatment referral information. Motivational content emphasized either the financial, health, or values-based benefits of quitting. One arm received a referral letter with no motivational content, and one arm received no letter. Enrollment in the referred tobacco cessation program was monitored for 5 months. Treatment was available to all participants through their insurance. RESULTS: Across all four letter conditions, 0.8% of participants enrolled in tobacco treatment compared to 0.9% in the no letter reference group (p = .69). No single letter condition was superior to the others (p = .71), but treatment uptake was greater among participants who received their care and coverage from the health plan versus those with insurance coverage only (1.2% vs. 0.3%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: A one-time, mailed letter is not a cost-effective strategy for promoting use of covered smoking cessation treatment within large health plan populations, particularly when the message source is an insurance provider only and does not also provide clinical care. Health plans and insurers should consider alternative outreach efforts to promote treatment uptake among smokers. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: TRN registered retrospectively with ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com). Registered on 11/01/2018. Registration number: ISRCTN32311137. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5806243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58062432018-02-15 Evaluation of a population-level strategy to promote tobacco treatment use among insured smokers: a pragmatic, randomized trial McClure, Jennifer B. Anderson, Melissa L. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Most smokers do not use evidence-based smoking cessation treatment. Increasing utilization of these services is an important public health goal. Health care systems and insurers are well positioned to support this goal within their patient populations. We tested whether a brief, mail-based intervention increased utilization of tobacco cessation services among insured smokers. METHODS: Adult smokers were identified via automated health plan data and randomized to one of five treatment arms (n = 4767). Randomization was stratified by gender, age, and type of health plan coverage. Three arms received a letter containing motivational content and treatment referral information. Motivational content emphasized either the financial, health, or values-based benefits of quitting. One arm received a referral letter with no motivational content, and one arm received no letter. Enrollment in the referred tobacco cessation program was monitored for 5 months. Treatment was available to all participants through their insurance. RESULTS: Across all four letter conditions, 0.8% of participants enrolled in tobacco treatment compared to 0.9% in the no letter reference group (p = .69). No single letter condition was superior to the others (p = .71), but treatment uptake was greater among participants who received their care and coverage from the health plan versus those with insurance coverage only (1.2% vs. 0.3%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: A one-time, mailed letter is not a cost-effective strategy for promoting use of covered smoking cessation treatment within large health plan populations, particularly when the message source is an insurance provider only and does not also provide clinical care. Health plans and insurers should consider alternative outreach efforts to promote treatment uptake among smokers. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: TRN registered retrospectively with ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com). Registered on 11/01/2018. Registration number: ISRCTN32311137. BioMed Central 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5806243/ /pubmed/29422026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5119-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McClure, Jennifer B. Anderson, Melissa L. Evaluation of a population-level strategy to promote tobacco treatment use among insured smokers: a pragmatic, randomized trial |
title | Evaluation of a population-level strategy to promote tobacco treatment use among insured smokers: a pragmatic, randomized trial |
title_full | Evaluation of a population-level strategy to promote tobacco treatment use among insured smokers: a pragmatic, randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a population-level strategy to promote tobacco treatment use among insured smokers: a pragmatic, randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a population-level strategy to promote tobacco treatment use among insured smokers: a pragmatic, randomized trial |
title_short | Evaluation of a population-level strategy to promote tobacco treatment use among insured smokers: a pragmatic, randomized trial |
title_sort | evaluation of a population-level strategy to promote tobacco treatment use among insured smokers: a pragmatic, randomized trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29422026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5119-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcclurejenniferb evaluationofapopulationlevelstrategytopromotetobaccotreatmentuseamonginsuredsmokersapragmaticrandomizedtrial AT andersonmelissal evaluationofapopulationlevelstrategytopromotetobaccotreatmentuseamonginsuredsmokersapragmaticrandomizedtrial |