Cargando…
Simulation as a toolkit—understanding the perils of blood transfusion in a complex health care environment
BACKGROUND: Administration of blood is a complex process requiring vigilance and effective teamwork. Despite strict policies and training on blood administration, errors still occur and can lead to mistransfusion with adverse patient outcomes. We used an in situ simulated scenario within an operatin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0032-z |
_version_ | 1783299095135256576 |
---|---|
author | Campbell, Douglas M. Poost-Foroosh, Laya Pavenski, Katerina Contreras, Maya Alam, Fahad Lee, Jason Houston, Patricia |
author_facet | Campbell, Douglas M. Poost-Foroosh, Laya Pavenski, Katerina Contreras, Maya Alam, Fahad Lee, Jason Houston, Patricia |
author_sort | Campbell, Douglas M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Administration of blood is a complex process requiring vigilance and effective teamwork. Despite strict policies and training on blood administration, errors still occur and can lead to mistransfusion with adverse patient outcomes. We used an in situ simulated scenario within an operating room (OR) to identify weaknesses in the current process and hazards that could contribute to mistransfusion. METHODS: A process checklist of critical steps of safe transfusion was developed based on a large academic centre’s internal hospital policy and practice. Ten standardized operating room scenarios were conducted involving management of postoperative bleeding. Scenarios lasted 20 min or until blood transfusion was started. Debriefing followed immediately. Video recordings were reviewed, scored, and evaluated for team performance. Latent safety threats were identified. Focus groups further helped to identify rationale for decisions made. Participants completed questionnaires to evaluate the exercise. RESULTS: Forty-three experienced OR professionals participated. Of the 19 steps identified as essential for the safe administration of blood components, the median number of steps correctly completed per team was 11. The largest number of errors occurred when different team members interacted and during the immediate pre-transfusion check. We report that this type of learning immediately increased participants’ self-reported ability to perform in a team (90%) and to improve clinical care (88%). CONCLUSIONS: In situ simulation is valuable in identifying common susceptibilities in blood administration error in a complex healthcare organization. Administrators and clinicians may wish to use simulation as an opportunity for system improvement in the delivery of quality care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5806277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58062772018-02-15 Simulation as a toolkit—understanding the perils of blood transfusion in a complex health care environment Campbell, Douglas M. Poost-Foroosh, Laya Pavenski, Katerina Contreras, Maya Alam, Fahad Lee, Jason Houston, Patricia Adv Simul (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Administration of blood is a complex process requiring vigilance and effective teamwork. Despite strict policies and training on blood administration, errors still occur and can lead to mistransfusion with adverse patient outcomes. We used an in situ simulated scenario within an operating room (OR) to identify weaknesses in the current process and hazards that could contribute to mistransfusion. METHODS: A process checklist of critical steps of safe transfusion was developed based on a large academic centre’s internal hospital policy and practice. Ten standardized operating room scenarios were conducted involving management of postoperative bleeding. Scenarios lasted 20 min or until blood transfusion was started. Debriefing followed immediately. Video recordings were reviewed, scored, and evaluated for team performance. Latent safety threats were identified. Focus groups further helped to identify rationale for decisions made. Participants completed questionnaires to evaluate the exercise. RESULTS: Forty-three experienced OR professionals participated. Of the 19 steps identified as essential for the safe administration of blood components, the median number of steps correctly completed per team was 11. The largest number of errors occurred when different team members interacted and during the immediate pre-transfusion check. We report that this type of learning immediately increased participants’ self-reported ability to perform in a team (90%) and to improve clinical care (88%). CONCLUSIONS: In situ simulation is valuable in identifying common susceptibilities in blood administration error in a complex healthcare organization. Administrators and clinicians may wish to use simulation as an opportunity for system improvement in the delivery of quality care. BioMed Central 2016-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5806277/ /pubmed/29450001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0032-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Campbell, Douglas M. Poost-Foroosh, Laya Pavenski, Katerina Contreras, Maya Alam, Fahad Lee, Jason Houston, Patricia Simulation as a toolkit—understanding the perils of blood transfusion in a complex health care environment |
title | Simulation as a toolkit—understanding the perils of blood transfusion in a complex health care environment |
title_full | Simulation as a toolkit—understanding the perils of blood transfusion in a complex health care environment |
title_fullStr | Simulation as a toolkit—understanding the perils of blood transfusion in a complex health care environment |
title_full_unstemmed | Simulation as a toolkit—understanding the perils of blood transfusion in a complex health care environment |
title_short | Simulation as a toolkit—understanding the perils of blood transfusion in a complex health care environment |
title_sort | simulation as a toolkit—understanding the perils of blood transfusion in a complex health care environment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0032-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbelldouglasm simulationasatoolkitunderstandingtheperilsofbloodtransfusioninacomplexhealthcareenvironment AT poostforooshlaya simulationasatoolkitunderstandingtheperilsofbloodtransfusioninacomplexhealthcareenvironment AT pavenskikaterina simulationasatoolkitunderstandingtheperilsofbloodtransfusioninacomplexhealthcareenvironment AT contrerasmaya simulationasatoolkitunderstandingtheperilsofbloodtransfusioninacomplexhealthcareenvironment AT alamfahad simulationasatoolkitunderstandingtheperilsofbloodtransfusioninacomplexhealthcareenvironment AT leejason simulationasatoolkitunderstandingtheperilsofbloodtransfusioninacomplexhealthcareenvironment AT houstonpatricia simulationasatoolkitunderstandingtheperilsofbloodtransfusioninacomplexhealthcareenvironment |