Cargando…

Ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience

BACKGROUND: Medical students transitioning into professional practice feel underprepared to deal with the emotional complexities of real-life ethical situations. Simulation-based learning (SBL) may provide a safe environment for students to probe the boundaries of ethical encounters. Published studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Gareth, McCullough, Melissa, Maxwell, Alexander P, Gormley, Gerard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0027-9
_version_ 1783299098482311168
author Lewis, Gareth
McCullough, Melissa
Maxwell, Alexander P
Gormley, Gerard J.
author_facet Lewis, Gareth
McCullough, Melissa
Maxwell, Alexander P
Gormley, Gerard J.
author_sort Lewis, Gareth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical students transitioning into professional practice feel underprepared to deal with the emotional complexities of real-life ethical situations. Simulation-based learning (SBL) may provide a safe environment for students to probe the boundaries of ethical encounters. Published studies of ethics simulation have not generated sufficiently deep accounts of student experience to inform pedagogy. The aim of this study was to understand students’ lived experiences as they engaged with the emotional challenges of managing clinical ethical dilemmas within a SBL environment. METHODS: This qualitative study was underpinned by an interpretivist epistemology. Eight senior medical students participated in an interprofessional ward-based SBL activity incorporating a series of ethically challenging encounters. Each student wore digital video glasses to capture point-of-view (PoV) film footage. Students were interviewed immediately after the simulation and the PoV footage played back to them. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. An interpretative phenomenological approach, using an established template analysis approach, was used to iteratively analyse the data. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged from the analysis: (1) ‘Authentic on all levels?’, (2)‘Letting the emotions flow’, (3) ‘Ethical alarm bells’ and (4) ‘Voices of children and ghosts’. Students recognised many explicit ethical dilemmas during the SBL activity but had difficulty navigating more subtle ethical and professional boundaries. In emotionally complex situations, instances of moral compromise were observed (such as telling an untruth). Some participants felt unable to raise concerns or challenge unethical behaviour within the scenarios due to prior negative undergraduate experiences. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided deep insights into medical students’ immersive and embodied experiences of ethical reasoning during an authentic SBL activity. By layering on the human dimensions of ethical decision-making, students can understand their personal responses to emotion, complexity and interprofessional working. This could assist them in framing and observing appropriate ethical and professional boundaries and help smooth the transition into clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0027-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5806291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58062912018-02-15 Ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience Lewis, Gareth McCullough, Melissa Maxwell, Alexander P Gormley, Gerard J. Adv Simul (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Medical students transitioning into professional practice feel underprepared to deal with the emotional complexities of real-life ethical situations. Simulation-based learning (SBL) may provide a safe environment for students to probe the boundaries of ethical encounters. Published studies of ethics simulation have not generated sufficiently deep accounts of student experience to inform pedagogy. The aim of this study was to understand students’ lived experiences as they engaged with the emotional challenges of managing clinical ethical dilemmas within a SBL environment. METHODS: This qualitative study was underpinned by an interpretivist epistemology. Eight senior medical students participated in an interprofessional ward-based SBL activity incorporating a series of ethically challenging encounters. Each student wore digital video glasses to capture point-of-view (PoV) film footage. Students were interviewed immediately after the simulation and the PoV footage played back to them. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. An interpretative phenomenological approach, using an established template analysis approach, was used to iteratively analyse the data. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged from the analysis: (1) ‘Authentic on all levels?’, (2)‘Letting the emotions flow’, (3) ‘Ethical alarm bells’ and (4) ‘Voices of children and ghosts’. Students recognised many explicit ethical dilemmas during the SBL activity but had difficulty navigating more subtle ethical and professional boundaries. In emotionally complex situations, instances of moral compromise were observed (such as telling an untruth). Some participants felt unable to raise concerns or challenge unethical behaviour within the scenarios due to prior negative undergraduate experiences. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided deep insights into medical students’ immersive and embodied experiences of ethical reasoning during an authentic SBL activity. By layering on the human dimensions of ethical decision-making, students can understand their personal responses to emotion, complexity and interprofessional working. This could assist them in framing and observing appropriate ethical and professional boundaries and help smooth the transition into clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0027-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5806291/ /pubmed/29449995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0027-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lewis, Gareth
McCullough, Melissa
Maxwell, Alexander P
Gormley, Gerard J.
Ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience
title Ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience
title_full Ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience
title_fullStr Ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience
title_full_unstemmed Ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience
title_short Ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience
title_sort ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0027-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisgareth ethicalreasoningthroughsimulationaphenomenologicalanalysisofstudentexperience
AT mcculloughmelissa ethicalreasoningthroughsimulationaphenomenologicalanalysisofstudentexperience
AT maxwellalexanderp ethicalreasoningthroughsimulationaphenomenologicalanalysisofstudentexperience
AT gormleygerardj ethicalreasoningthroughsimulationaphenomenologicalanalysisofstudentexperience