Cargando…

Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tube (ETT) fasteners such as the AnchorFast™ claim to assist with the prevention of oral pressure injuries in intubated patients, however evidence to support their clinical efficacy is limited. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the impact of the int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hampson, Jaye, Green, Cameron, Stewart, Joanne, Armitstead, Lauren, Degan, Gemma, Aubrey, Andrea, Paul, Eldho, Tiruvoipati, Ravindranath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-018-0274-2
_version_ 1783299121634869248
author Hampson, Jaye
Green, Cameron
Stewart, Joanne
Armitstead, Lauren
Degan, Gemma
Aubrey, Andrea
Paul, Eldho
Tiruvoipati, Ravindranath
author_facet Hampson, Jaye
Green, Cameron
Stewart, Joanne
Armitstead, Lauren
Degan, Gemma
Aubrey, Andrea
Paul, Eldho
Tiruvoipati, Ravindranath
author_sort Hampson, Jaye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tube (ETT) fasteners such as the AnchorFast™ claim to assist with the prevention of oral pressure injuries in intubated patients, however evidence to support their clinical efficacy is limited. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the impact of the introduction of the AnchorFast™ device on the incidence of oral pressure injuries in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: Data was collected from patient case notes and clinical incident reports for October 2010 to June 2013 (pre-AnchorFast) and July 2013 to March 2016 (post-AnchorFast). Incidence and location of oral pressure injuries associated with securing device, and compliance with institutional policies related to reducing oral pressure injuries were recorded. RESULTS: Incidence of oral pressure injuries increased from 1.53/100 intubated patients in the pre-AnchorFast period to 3.73/100 intubated patients in the post-AnchorFast period (IRR = 2.43, 95%CI = 1.35–4.38; p = 0.003). Across both study periods, patients with an ETT secured using AnchorFast™ had significantly increased risk of oral pressure injuries (IRR = 2.03, 95%CI = 1.17–3.51; p = 0.02). There was also a significant difference in location of pressure injuries sustained with ETTs secured using cloth tapes (53.6% in corner of the mouth) vs. AnchorFast™ (75% on the lips) (p = 0.008). Among patients with oral pressure injuries, compliance with institutional policies relating to the prevention of pressure injuries was significantly greater after the introduction of the AnchorFast™ (9.1% vs 64.5%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of oral pressure injuries increased significantly following the introduction of the AnchorFast™ device. Further research is required to establish the reasons for this observed increase to and identify ways to reduce the risk of pressure injuries with ETT securement devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5806388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58063882018-02-15 Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study Hampson, Jaye Green, Cameron Stewart, Joanne Armitstead, Lauren Degan, Gemma Aubrey, Andrea Paul, Eldho Tiruvoipati, Ravindranath BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tube (ETT) fasteners such as the AnchorFast™ claim to assist with the prevention of oral pressure injuries in intubated patients, however evidence to support their clinical efficacy is limited. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the impact of the introduction of the AnchorFast™ device on the incidence of oral pressure injuries in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: Data was collected from patient case notes and clinical incident reports for October 2010 to June 2013 (pre-AnchorFast) and July 2013 to March 2016 (post-AnchorFast). Incidence and location of oral pressure injuries associated with securing device, and compliance with institutional policies related to reducing oral pressure injuries were recorded. RESULTS: Incidence of oral pressure injuries increased from 1.53/100 intubated patients in the pre-AnchorFast period to 3.73/100 intubated patients in the post-AnchorFast period (IRR = 2.43, 95%CI = 1.35–4.38; p = 0.003). Across both study periods, patients with an ETT secured using AnchorFast™ had significantly increased risk of oral pressure injuries (IRR = 2.03, 95%CI = 1.17–3.51; p = 0.02). There was also a significant difference in location of pressure injuries sustained with ETTs secured using cloth tapes (53.6% in corner of the mouth) vs. AnchorFast™ (75% on the lips) (p = 0.008). Among patients with oral pressure injuries, compliance with institutional policies relating to the prevention of pressure injuries was significantly greater after the introduction of the AnchorFast™ (9.1% vs 64.5%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of oral pressure injuries increased significantly following the introduction of the AnchorFast™ device. Further research is required to establish the reasons for this observed increase to and identify ways to reduce the risk of pressure injuries with ETT securement devices. BioMed Central 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5806388/ /pubmed/29449786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-018-0274-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hampson, Jaye
Green, Cameron
Stewart, Joanne
Armitstead, Lauren
Degan, Gemma
Aubrey, Andrea
Paul, Eldho
Tiruvoipati, Ravindranath
Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study
title Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study
title_full Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study
title_short Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study
title_sort impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-018-0274-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hampsonjaye impactoftheintroductionofanendotrachealtubeattachmentdeviceontheincidenceandseverityoforalpressureinjuriesintheintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT greencameron impactoftheintroductionofanendotrachealtubeattachmentdeviceontheincidenceandseverityoforalpressureinjuriesintheintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT stewartjoanne impactoftheintroductionofanendotrachealtubeattachmentdeviceontheincidenceandseverityoforalpressureinjuriesintheintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT armitsteadlauren impactoftheintroductionofanendotrachealtubeattachmentdeviceontheincidenceandseverityoforalpressureinjuriesintheintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT degangemma impactoftheintroductionofanendotrachealtubeattachmentdeviceontheincidenceandseverityoforalpressureinjuriesintheintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT aubreyandrea impactoftheintroductionofanendotrachealtubeattachmentdeviceontheincidenceandseverityoforalpressureinjuriesintheintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT pauleldho impactoftheintroductionofanendotrachealtubeattachmentdeviceontheincidenceandseverityoforalpressureinjuriesintheintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT tiruvoipatiravindranath impactoftheintroductionofanendotrachealtubeattachmentdeviceontheincidenceandseverityoforalpressureinjuriesintheintensivecareunitaretrospectiveobservationalstudy