Cargando…

Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A co-transplanted liver allograft has been thought to protect other organs from rejection-mediated injury; however, detailed analyses of co-transplanted liver on intestinal allograft outcomes have not been conducted to date. The aim of the study was to compare immune-mediated in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Guosheng, Cruz, Ruy J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gox043
_version_ 1783299123780255744
author Wu, Guosheng
Cruz, Ruy J
author_facet Wu, Guosheng
Cruz, Ruy J
author_sort Wu, Guosheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A co-transplanted liver allograft has been thought to protect other organs from rejection-mediated injury; however, detailed analyses of co-transplanted liver on intestinal allograft outcomes have not been conducted to date. The aim of the study was to compare immune-mediated injury, causes of graft failure and clinical outcomes between recipients who underwent either a liver-inclusive intestinal transplant (LITx) or liver-exclusive intestinal transplant (LETx). METHODS: Between May 2000 and May 2010, 212 adult patients undergoing LITx (n =76) and LETx (n =136) were included. LITx underwent either liver combined intestinal or full multivisceral transplantation. LETx underwent either isolated intestinal or modified multivisceral transplantation. RESULTS: During 44.9 ± 31.4 months of follow-up, death-censored intestinal graft survival was significantly higher for LITx than LETx (96.9%, 93.2% and 89.9% vs 91.4%, 69.3% and 60.0% at 1, 3 and 5 years; p =0.0001). Incidence of graft loss due to rejection was higher in LETx than in LITx (30.9% vs 6.6%; p <0.0001), while infection was the leading cause of graft loss due to patient death in LITx (25.0% vs 5.1%; p <0.0001). Despite similar immunosuppression, the average number (0.87 vs 1.42, p =0.02) and severity of acute cellular rejection episode (severe grade: 7.9% vs 21.3%; p =0.01) were lower in LITx than in LETx. Incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection was also significantly lower in LITx than in LETx (3.6% vs 15.2%; p =0.03). Incidence of chronic rejection was reduced in LITx (3.9% vs 24.3%; p =0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal allografts with a liver component appear to decrease risk of rejection but increase risk of infection. Our findings emphasize that LITx has characteristic immunologic and clinical features. Lower immunosuppression may need to be considered for patients who undergo LITx to attenuate increased risk of infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5806397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58063972018-02-23 Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection Wu, Guosheng Cruz, Ruy J Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A co-transplanted liver allograft has been thought to protect other organs from rejection-mediated injury; however, detailed analyses of co-transplanted liver on intestinal allograft outcomes have not been conducted to date. The aim of the study was to compare immune-mediated injury, causes of graft failure and clinical outcomes between recipients who underwent either a liver-inclusive intestinal transplant (LITx) or liver-exclusive intestinal transplant (LETx). METHODS: Between May 2000 and May 2010, 212 adult patients undergoing LITx (n =76) and LETx (n =136) were included. LITx underwent either liver combined intestinal or full multivisceral transplantation. LETx underwent either isolated intestinal or modified multivisceral transplantation. RESULTS: During 44.9 ± 31.4 months of follow-up, death-censored intestinal graft survival was significantly higher for LITx than LETx (96.9%, 93.2% and 89.9% vs 91.4%, 69.3% and 60.0% at 1, 3 and 5 years; p =0.0001). Incidence of graft loss due to rejection was higher in LETx than in LITx (30.9% vs 6.6%; p <0.0001), while infection was the leading cause of graft loss due to patient death in LITx (25.0% vs 5.1%; p <0.0001). Despite similar immunosuppression, the average number (0.87 vs 1.42, p =0.02) and severity of acute cellular rejection episode (severe grade: 7.9% vs 21.3%; p =0.01) were lower in LITx than in LETx. Incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection was also significantly lower in LITx than in LETx (3.6% vs 15.2%; p =0.03). Incidence of chronic rejection was reduced in LITx (3.9% vs 24.3%; p =0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal allografts with a liver component appear to decrease risk of rejection but increase risk of infection. Our findings emphasize that LITx has characteristic immunologic and clinical features. Lower immunosuppression may need to be considered for patients who undergo LITx to attenuate increased risk of infection. Oxford University Press 2018-02 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5806397/ /pubmed/29479440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gox043 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press and Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wu, Guosheng
Cruz, Ruy J
Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection
title Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection
title_full Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection
title_fullStr Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection
title_full_unstemmed Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection
title_short Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection
title_sort liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gox043
work_keys_str_mv AT wuguosheng liverinclusiveintestinaltransplantationresultsindecreasedalloimmunemediatedrejectionbutincreasedinfection
AT cruzruyj liverinclusiveintestinaltransplantationresultsindecreasedalloimmunemediatedrejectionbutincreasedinfection