Cargando…

Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the IMPACT (IMProving Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory is to assess the transformation of clinical trials (CT) related to the evolution of sharing of CT data. The objective of this study is to establish a baseline for monitoring CT data sharing by the Observatory....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahmić-Kaknjo, Mersiha, Šimić, Josip, Krleža-Jerić, Karmela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472799
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2018.010201
_version_ 1783299157856878592
author Mahmić-Kaknjo, Mersiha
Šimić, Josip
Krleža-Jerić, Karmela
author_facet Mahmić-Kaknjo, Mersiha
Šimić, Josip
Krleža-Jerić, Karmela
author_sort Mahmić-Kaknjo, Mersiha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of the IMPACT (IMProving Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory is to assess the transformation of clinical trials (CT) related to the evolution of sharing of CT data. The objective of this study is to establish a baseline for monitoring CT data sharing by the Observatory. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this scoping review we searched for publications that address sharing, dissemination, transparency or reuse of CT data published prior to December 31st 2000. Two authors screened titles and abstracts of 1204 records received by Medline searches and added 47 publications from direct discovery. Four researchers extracted, coded, and analyzed the predefined information from 102 selected papers. RESULTS: We found a growing recognition of the importance of data sharing prior to 2001. However, there were numerous obstacles including the ambiguity of the concept of data sharing, the absence of specific terminology and the lack of an “open” culture. By the end of 2000, data, metadata, and evidence based medicine were defined. Data sharing, registries, databases and re-analyses of individual patient data (IPD) emerged. The use of systematic reviews and IPD meta-analysis in decision making was promoted. Most arguments for broader data sharing came from oncology, paediatrics, rare diseases, AIDS, pregnancy, perinatal medicine, and media reporting related scandals. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the year 2000 could be used as a baseline for monitoring the evolution of CT data sharing as basic prerequisites were set in place, including greater understanding that CT data sharing is essential for decision making and the advancements of the Internet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5806612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58066122018-02-22 Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline Mahmić-Kaknjo, Mersiha Šimić, Josip Krleža-Jerić, Karmela Biochem Med (Zagreb) Research Integrity Corner INTRODUCTION: The aim of the IMPACT (IMProving Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory is to assess the transformation of clinical trials (CT) related to the evolution of sharing of CT data. The objective of this study is to establish a baseline for monitoring CT data sharing by the Observatory. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this scoping review we searched for publications that address sharing, dissemination, transparency or reuse of CT data published prior to December 31st 2000. Two authors screened titles and abstracts of 1204 records received by Medline searches and added 47 publications from direct discovery. Four researchers extracted, coded, and analyzed the predefined information from 102 selected papers. RESULTS: We found a growing recognition of the importance of data sharing prior to 2001. However, there were numerous obstacles including the ambiguity of the concept of data sharing, the absence of specific terminology and the lack of an “open” culture. By the end of 2000, data, metadata, and evidence based medicine were defined. Data sharing, registries, databases and re-analyses of individual patient data (IPD) emerged. The use of systematic reviews and IPD meta-analysis in decision making was promoted. Most arguments for broader data sharing came from oncology, paediatrics, rare diseases, AIDS, pregnancy, perinatal medicine, and media reporting related scandals. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the year 2000 could be used as a baseline for monitoring the evolution of CT data sharing as basic prerequisites were set in place, including greater understanding that CT data sharing is essential for decision making and the advancements of the Internet. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2018-02-15 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5806612/ /pubmed/29472799 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2018.010201 Text en ©Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Integrity Corner
Mahmić-Kaknjo, Mersiha
Šimić, Josip
Krleža-Jerić, Karmela
Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline
title Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline
title_full Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline
title_fullStr Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline
title_full_unstemmed Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline
title_short Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline
title_sort setting the impact (improve access to clinical trial data) observatory baseline
topic Research Integrity Corner
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472799
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2018.010201
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmickaknjomersiha settingtheimpactimproveaccesstoclinicaltrialdataobservatorybaseline
AT simicjosip settingtheimpactimproveaccesstoclinicaltrialdataobservatorybaseline
AT krlezajerickarmela settingtheimpactimproveaccesstoclinicaltrialdataobservatorybaseline