Cargando…

Colorectal Cancer Screening—Who, How, and When?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. It is amenable to screening as it occurs in premalignant, latent, early, and curable stages. PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and national and international CRC screening guidelines were searched for CRC screening met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bevan, Roisin, Rutter, Matthew D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29397655
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.141
_version_ 1783299197559111680
author Bevan, Roisin
Rutter, Matthew D
author_facet Bevan, Roisin
Rutter, Matthew D
author_sort Bevan, Roisin
collection PubMed
description Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. It is amenable to screening as it occurs in premalignant, latent, early, and curable stages. PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and national and international CRC screening guidelines were searched for CRC screening methods, populations, and timing. CRC screening can use direct or indirect tests, delivered opportunistically or via organized programs. Most CRCs are diagnosed after 60 years of age; most screening programs apply to individuals 50–75 years of age. Screening may reduce disease-specific mortality by detecting CRC in earlier stages, and CRC incidence by detecting premalignant polyps, which can subsequently be removed. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBt) was found to reduce CRC mortality by 13%–33%. Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has no RCT data comparing it to no screening, but is superior to gFOBt. Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) trials demonstrated an 18% reduction in CRC incidence and a 28% reduction in CRC mortality. Currently, RCT evidence for colonoscopy screening is scarce. Although not yet corroborated by RCTs, it is likely that colonoscopy is the best screening modality for an individual. From a population perspective, organized programs are superior to opportunistic screening. However, no nation can offer organized population-wide colonoscopy screening. Thus, organized programs using cheaper modalities, such as FS/FIT, can be tailored to budget and capacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5806924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58069242018-02-13 Colorectal Cancer Screening—Who, How, and When? Bevan, Roisin Rutter, Matthew D Clin Endosc Review Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. It is amenable to screening as it occurs in premalignant, latent, early, and curable stages. PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and national and international CRC screening guidelines were searched for CRC screening methods, populations, and timing. CRC screening can use direct or indirect tests, delivered opportunistically or via organized programs. Most CRCs are diagnosed after 60 years of age; most screening programs apply to individuals 50–75 years of age. Screening may reduce disease-specific mortality by detecting CRC in earlier stages, and CRC incidence by detecting premalignant polyps, which can subsequently be removed. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBt) was found to reduce CRC mortality by 13%–33%. Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has no RCT data comparing it to no screening, but is superior to gFOBt. Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) trials demonstrated an 18% reduction in CRC incidence and a 28% reduction in CRC mortality. Currently, RCT evidence for colonoscopy screening is scarce. Although not yet corroborated by RCTs, it is likely that colonoscopy is the best screening modality for an individual. From a population perspective, organized programs are superior to opportunistic screening. However, no nation can offer organized population-wide colonoscopy screening. Thus, organized programs using cheaper modalities, such as FS/FIT, can be tailored to budget and capacity. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018-01 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5806924/ /pubmed/29397655 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.141 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Bevan, Roisin
Rutter, Matthew D
Colorectal Cancer Screening—Who, How, and When?
title Colorectal Cancer Screening—Who, How, and When?
title_full Colorectal Cancer Screening—Who, How, and When?
title_fullStr Colorectal Cancer Screening—Who, How, and When?
title_full_unstemmed Colorectal Cancer Screening—Who, How, and When?
title_short Colorectal Cancer Screening—Who, How, and When?
title_sort colorectal cancer screening—who, how, and when?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29397655
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.141
work_keys_str_mv AT bevanroisin colorectalcancerscreeningwhohowandwhen
AT ruttermatthewd colorectalcancerscreeningwhohowandwhen