Cargando…

Visual Features in the Perception of Liquids

Perceptual constancy—identifying surfaces and objects across large image changes—remains an important challenge for visual neuroscience [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Liquids are particularly challenging because they respond to external forces in complex, highly variable ways, presenting an enormous rang...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Assen, Jan Jaap R., Barla, Pascal, Fleming, Roland W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29395924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.037
_version_ 1783299227580891136
author van Assen, Jan Jaap R.
Barla, Pascal
Fleming, Roland W.
author_facet van Assen, Jan Jaap R.
Barla, Pascal
Fleming, Roland W.
author_sort van Assen, Jan Jaap R.
collection PubMed
description Perceptual constancy—identifying surfaces and objects across large image changes—remains an important challenge for visual neuroscience [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Liquids are particularly challenging because they respond to external forces in complex, highly variable ways, presenting an enormous range of images to the visual system. To achieve constancy, the brain must perform a causal inference [9, 10, 11] that disentangles the liquid’s viscosity from external factors—like gravity and object interactions—that also affect the liquid’s behavior. Here, we tested whether the visual system estimates viscosity using “midlevel” features [12, 13, 14] that respond more to viscosity than other factors. Observers reported the perceived viscosity of simulated liquids ranging from water to molten glass exhibiting diverse behaviors (e.g., pouring, stirring). A separate group of observers rated the same animations for 20 midlevel 3D shape and motion features. Applying factor analysis to the feature ratings reveals that a weighted combination of four underlying factors (distribution, irregularity, rectilinearity, and dynamics) predicted perceived viscosity very well across this wide range of contexts (R(2) = 0.93). Interestingly, observers unknowingly ordered their midlevel judgments according to the one common factor across contexts: variation in viscosity. Principal component analysis reveals that across the features, the first component lines up almost perfectly with the viscosity (R(2) = 0.96). Our findings demonstrate that the visual system achieves constancy by representing stimuli in a multidimensional feature space—based on complementary, midlevel features—which successfully cluster very different stimuli together and tease similar stimuli apart, so that viscosity can be read out easily.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5807092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58070922018-02-13 Visual Features in the Perception of Liquids van Assen, Jan Jaap R. Barla, Pascal Fleming, Roland W. Curr Biol Article Perceptual constancy—identifying surfaces and objects across large image changes—remains an important challenge for visual neuroscience [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Liquids are particularly challenging because they respond to external forces in complex, highly variable ways, presenting an enormous range of images to the visual system. To achieve constancy, the brain must perform a causal inference [9, 10, 11] that disentangles the liquid’s viscosity from external factors—like gravity and object interactions—that also affect the liquid’s behavior. Here, we tested whether the visual system estimates viscosity using “midlevel” features [12, 13, 14] that respond more to viscosity than other factors. Observers reported the perceived viscosity of simulated liquids ranging from water to molten glass exhibiting diverse behaviors (e.g., pouring, stirring). A separate group of observers rated the same animations for 20 midlevel 3D shape and motion features. Applying factor analysis to the feature ratings reveals that a weighted combination of four underlying factors (distribution, irregularity, rectilinearity, and dynamics) predicted perceived viscosity very well across this wide range of contexts (R(2) = 0.93). Interestingly, observers unknowingly ordered their midlevel judgments according to the one common factor across contexts: variation in viscosity. Principal component analysis reveals that across the features, the first component lines up almost perfectly with the viscosity (R(2) = 0.96). Our findings demonstrate that the visual system achieves constancy by representing stimuli in a multidimensional feature space—based on complementary, midlevel features—which successfully cluster very different stimuli together and tease similar stimuli apart, so that viscosity can be read out easily. Cell Press 2018-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5807092/ /pubmed/29395924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.037 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
van Assen, Jan Jaap R.
Barla, Pascal
Fleming, Roland W.
Visual Features in the Perception of Liquids
title Visual Features in the Perception of Liquids
title_full Visual Features in the Perception of Liquids
title_fullStr Visual Features in the Perception of Liquids
title_full_unstemmed Visual Features in the Perception of Liquids
title_short Visual Features in the Perception of Liquids
title_sort visual features in the perception of liquids
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29395924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.037
work_keys_str_mv AT vanassenjanjaapr visualfeaturesintheperceptionofliquids
AT barlapascal visualfeaturesintheperceptionofliquids
AT flemingrolandw visualfeaturesintheperceptionofliquids