Cargando…

Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?

BACKGROUND: Surgeons of today are faced with unprecedented challenges; necessitating a novel approach to pre-operative preparation which takes into account the specific tests each case poses. In this study, we examine patient-specific mental rehearsal for pre-surgical practice and assess whether thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yiasemidou, Marina, Galli, Raffaele, Glassman, Daniel, Tang, Matthew, Aziz, Rahoz, Jayne, David, Miskovic, Danilo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28840324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5788-2
_version_ 1783299282429804544
author Yiasemidou, Marina
Galli, Raffaele
Glassman, Daniel
Tang, Matthew
Aziz, Rahoz
Jayne, David
Miskovic, Danilo
author_facet Yiasemidou, Marina
Galli, Raffaele
Glassman, Daniel
Tang, Matthew
Aziz, Rahoz
Jayne, David
Miskovic, Danilo
author_sort Yiasemidou, Marina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgeons of today are faced with unprecedented challenges; necessitating a novel approach to pre-operative preparation which takes into account the specific tests each case poses. In this study, we examine patient-specific mental rehearsal for pre-surgical practice and assess whether this method has an additional effect when compared to generic mental rehearsal. METHODS: Sixteen medical students were trained how to perform a simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC). After baseline assessments, they were randomised to two equal groups and asked to complete three SLCs involving different anatomical variants. Prior to each procedure, Group A practiced mental rehearsal with the use of a pre-prepared checklist and Group B mental rehearsal with the checklist combined with virtual models matching the anatomical variations of the SLCs. The performance of the two groups was compared using simulator provided metrics and competency assessment tool (CAT) scoring by two blinded assessors. RESULTS: The participants performed equally well when presented with a “straight-forward” anatomy [Group A vs. Group B—time sec: 445.5 vs. 496 p = 0.64—NOM: 437 vs. 413 p = 0.88—PL cm: 1317 vs. 1059 p = 0.32—per: 0.5 vs. 0 p = 0.22—NCB: 0 vs. 0 p = 0.71—DVS: 0 vs. 0 p = 0.2]; however, Group B performed significantly better [Group A vs. B Total CAT score—Short Cystic Duct (SCD): 20.5 vs. 26.31 p = 0.02 η (2) = 0.32—Double cystic Artery (DA): 24.75 vs. 30.5 p = 0.03 η (2) = 0.28] and committed less errors (Damage to Vital Structures—DVS, SCD: 4 vs. 0 p = 0.03 η (2)=0.34, DA: 0 vs. 1 p = 0.02 η (2) = 0.22). in the cases with more challenging anatomies. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patient-specific preparation with the combination of anatomical models and mental rehearsal may increase operative quality of complex procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5807505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58075052018-02-13 Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring? Yiasemidou, Marina Galli, Raffaele Glassman, Daniel Tang, Matthew Aziz, Rahoz Jayne, David Miskovic, Danilo Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Surgeons of today are faced with unprecedented challenges; necessitating a novel approach to pre-operative preparation which takes into account the specific tests each case poses. In this study, we examine patient-specific mental rehearsal for pre-surgical practice and assess whether this method has an additional effect when compared to generic mental rehearsal. METHODS: Sixteen medical students were trained how to perform a simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC). After baseline assessments, they were randomised to two equal groups and asked to complete three SLCs involving different anatomical variants. Prior to each procedure, Group A practiced mental rehearsal with the use of a pre-prepared checklist and Group B mental rehearsal with the checklist combined with virtual models matching the anatomical variations of the SLCs. The performance of the two groups was compared using simulator provided metrics and competency assessment tool (CAT) scoring by two blinded assessors. RESULTS: The participants performed equally well when presented with a “straight-forward” anatomy [Group A vs. Group B—time sec: 445.5 vs. 496 p = 0.64—NOM: 437 vs. 413 p = 0.88—PL cm: 1317 vs. 1059 p = 0.32—per: 0.5 vs. 0 p = 0.22—NCB: 0 vs. 0 p = 0.71—DVS: 0 vs. 0 p = 0.2]; however, Group B performed significantly better [Group A vs. B Total CAT score—Short Cystic Duct (SCD): 20.5 vs. 26.31 p = 0.02 η (2) = 0.32—Double cystic Artery (DA): 24.75 vs. 30.5 p = 0.03 η (2) = 0.28] and committed less errors (Damage to Vital Structures—DVS, SCD: 4 vs. 0 p = 0.03 η (2)=0.34, DA: 0 vs. 1 p = 0.02 η (2) = 0.22). in the cases with more challenging anatomies. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patient-specific preparation with the combination of anatomical models and mental rehearsal may increase operative quality of complex procedures. Springer US 2017-08-24 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5807505/ /pubmed/28840324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5788-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Yiasemidou, Marina
Galli, Raffaele
Glassman, Daniel
Tang, Matthew
Aziz, Rahoz
Jayne, David
Miskovic, Danilo
Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?
title Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?
title_full Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?
title_fullStr Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?
title_full_unstemmed Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?
title_short Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?
title_sort patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28840324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5788-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yiasemidoumarina patientspecificmentalrehearsalwithinteractivevisualaidsapathworthexploring
AT galliraffaele patientspecificmentalrehearsalwithinteractivevisualaidsapathworthexploring
AT glassmandaniel patientspecificmentalrehearsalwithinteractivevisualaidsapathworthexploring
AT tangmatthew patientspecificmentalrehearsalwithinteractivevisualaidsapathworthexploring
AT azizrahoz patientspecificmentalrehearsalwithinteractivevisualaidsapathworthexploring
AT jaynedavid patientspecificmentalrehearsalwithinteractivevisualaidsapathworthexploring
AT miskovicdanilo patientspecificmentalrehearsalwithinteractivevisualaidsapathworthexploring