Cargando…

Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies

Quantification of the uncertainty in constitutive model predictions describing arterial wall mechanics is vital towards non-invasive assessment of vascular drug therapies. Therefore, we perform uncertainty quantification to determine uncertainty in mechanical characteristics describing the vessel wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G., Quicken, Sjeng, Holtackers, Robert J., Huberts, Wouter, Reesink, Koen D., Delhaas, Tammo, Spronck, Bart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28755237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0944-0
_version_ 1783299291999109120
author Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G.
Quicken, Sjeng
Holtackers, Robert J.
Huberts, Wouter
Reesink, Koen D.
Delhaas, Tammo
Spronck, Bart
author_facet Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G.
Quicken, Sjeng
Holtackers, Robert J.
Huberts, Wouter
Reesink, Koen D.
Delhaas, Tammo
Spronck, Bart
author_sort Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G.
collection PubMed
description Quantification of the uncertainty in constitutive model predictions describing arterial wall mechanics is vital towards non-invasive assessment of vascular drug therapies. Therefore, we perform uncertainty quantification to determine uncertainty in mechanical characteristics describing the vessel wall response upon loading. Furthermore, a global variance-based sensitivity analysis is performed to pinpoint measurements that are most rewarding to be measured more precisely. We used previously published carotid diameter–pressure and intima–media thickness (IMT) data (measured in triplicate), and Holzapfel–Gasser–Ogden models. A virtual data set containing 5000 diastolic and systolic diameter–pressure points, and IMT values was generated by adding measurement error to the average of the measured data. The model was fitted to single-exponential curves calculated from the data, obtaining distributions of constitutive parameters and constituent load bearing parameters. Additionally, we (1) simulated vascular drug treatment to assess the relevance of model uncertainty and (2) evaluated how increasing the number of measurement repetitions influences model uncertainty. We found substantial uncertainty in constitutive parameters. Simulating vascular drug treatment predicted a 6% point reduction in collagen load bearing ([Formula: see text] ), approximately 50% of its uncertainty. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the uncertainty in [Formula: see text] was primarily caused by noise in distension and IMT measurements. Spread in [Formula: see text] could be decreased by 50% when increasing the number of measurement repetitions from 3 to 10. Model uncertainty, notably that in [Formula: see text] , could conceal effects of vascular drug therapy. However, this uncertainty could be reduced by increasing the number of measurement repetitions of distension and wall thickness measurements used for model parameterisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5807551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58075512018-02-13 Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G. Quicken, Sjeng Holtackers, Robert J. Huberts, Wouter Reesink, Koen D. Delhaas, Tammo Spronck, Bart Biomech Model Mechanobiol Original Paper Quantification of the uncertainty in constitutive model predictions describing arterial wall mechanics is vital towards non-invasive assessment of vascular drug therapies. Therefore, we perform uncertainty quantification to determine uncertainty in mechanical characteristics describing the vessel wall response upon loading. Furthermore, a global variance-based sensitivity analysis is performed to pinpoint measurements that are most rewarding to be measured more precisely. We used previously published carotid diameter–pressure and intima–media thickness (IMT) data (measured in triplicate), and Holzapfel–Gasser–Ogden models. A virtual data set containing 5000 diastolic and systolic diameter–pressure points, and IMT values was generated by adding measurement error to the average of the measured data. The model was fitted to single-exponential curves calculated from the data, obtaining distributions of constitutive parameters and constituent load bearing parameters. Additionally, we (1) simulated vascular drug treatment to assess the relevance of model uncertainty and (2) evaluated how increasing the number of measurement repetitions influences model uncertainty. We found substantial uncertainty in constitutive parameters. Simulating vascular drug treatment predicted a 6% point reduction in collagen load bearing ([Formula: see text] ), approximately 50% of its uncertainty. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the uncertainty in [Formula: see text] was primarily caused by noise in distension and IMT measurements. Spread in [Formula: see text] could be decreased by 50% when increasing the number of measurement repetitions from 3 to 10. Model uncertainty, notably that in [Formula: see text] , could conceal effects of vascular drug therapy. However, this uncertainty could be reduced by increasing the number of measurement repetitions of distension and wall thickness measurements used for model parameterisation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-07-28 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5807551/ /pubmed/28755237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0944-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G.
Quicken, Sjeng
Holtackers, Robert J.
Huberts, Wouter
Reesink, Koen D.
Delhaas, Tammo
Spronck, Bart
Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies
title Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies
title_full Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies
title_fullStr Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies
title_short Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies
title_sort uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28755237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0944-0
work_keys_str_mv AT heusinkveldmaartenhg uncertaintyquantificationandsensitivityanalysisofanarterialwallmechanicsmodelforevaluationofvasculardrugtherapies
AT quickensjeng uncertaintyquantificationandsensitivityanalysisofanarterialwallmechanicsmodelforevaluationofvasculardrugtherapies
AT holtackersrobertj uncertaintyquantificationandsensitivityanalysisofanarterialwallmechanicsmodelforevaluationofvasculardrugtherapies
AT hubertswouter uncertaintyquantificationandsensitivityanalysisofanarterialwallmechanicsmodelforevaluationofvasculardrugtherapies
AT reesinkkoend uncertaintyquantificationandsensitivityanalysisofanarterialwallmechanicsmodelforevaluationofvasculardrugtherapies
AT delhaastammo uncertaintyquantificationandsensitivityanalysisofanarterialwallmechanicsmodelforevaluationofvasculardrugtherapies
AT spronckbart uncertaintyquantificationandsensitivityanalysisofanarterialwallmechanicsmodelforevaluationofvasculardrugtherapies