Cargando…
Quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for families of young Indigenous children attending primary care centers; a cross sectional analysis
BACKGROUND: The quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for Indigenous families of young children is not known, in many settings especially services provided by primary care centers. METHODS: Our primary objective was to assess delivery of social and emotional wellbeing services to the fa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29426308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2883-6 |
_version_ | 1783299360994361344 |
---|---|
author | Edmond, Karen M. McAuley, Kimberley McAullay, Daniel Matthews, Veronica Strobel, Natalie Marriott, Rhonda Bailie, Ross |
author_facet | Edmond, Karen M. McAuley, Kimberley McAullay, Daniel Matthews, Veronica Strobel, Natalie Marriott, Rhonda Bailie, Ross |
author_sort | Edmond, Karen M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for Indigenous families of young children is not known, in many settings especially services provided by primary care centers. METHODS: Our primary objective was to assess delivery of social and emotional wellbeing services to the families of young (3–11 months) and older (12–59 months) Indigenous children attending primary care centers. Our secondary objective was to assess if delivery differed by geographic location. Two thousand four hundred sixty-six client files from 109 primary care centers across Australia from 2012 to 2014 were analysed using logistic regression and generalised estimating equations. RESULTS: The proportion of families receiving social and emotional wellbeing services ranged from 10.6% (102) (food security) to 74.7% (1216) (assessment of parent child interaction). Seventy one percent (71%, 126) of families received follow up care. Families of children aged 3–11 months (39.5%, 225) were more likely to receive social and emotional wellbeing services (advice about domestic environment, social support, housing condition, child stimulation) than families of children aged 12–59 months (30.0%, 487) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.68 95% CI 1.33 to 2.13). Remote area families (32.6%, 622) received similar services to rural (29.4%, 68) and urban families (44.0%, 22) (aOR 0.64 95% CI 0.29, 1.44). CONCLUSIONS: The families of young Indigenous children appear to receive priority for social and emotional wellbeing care in Australian primary care centers, however many Indigenous families are not receiving services. Improvement in resourcing and support of social and emotional wellbeing services in primary care centers is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-2883-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5807859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58078592018-02-16 Quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for families of young Indigenous children attending primary care centers; a cross sectional analysis Edmond, Karen M. McAuley, Kimberley McAullay, Daniel Matthews, Veronica Strobel, Natalie Marriott, Rhonda Bailie, Ross BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for Indigenous families of young children is not known, in many settings especially services provided by primary care centers. METHODS: Our primary objective was to assess delivery of social and emotional wellbeing services to the families of young (3–11 months) and older (12–59 months) Indigenous children attending primary care centers. Our secondary objective was to assess if delivery differed by geographic location. Two thousand four hundred sixty-six client files from 109 primary care centers across Australia from 2012 to 2014 were analysed using logistic regression and generalised estimating equations. RESULTS: The proportion of families receiving social and emotional wellbeing services ranged from 10.6% (102) (food security) to 74.7% (1216) (assessment of parent child interaction). Seventy one percent (71%, 126) of families received follow up care. Families of children aged 3–11 months (39.5%, 225) were more likely to receive social and emotional wellbeing services (advice about domestic environment, social support, housing condition, child stimulation) than families of children aged 12–59 months (30.0%, 487) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.68 95% CI 1.33 to 2.13). Remote area families (32.6%, 622) received similar services to rural (29.4%, 68) and urban families (44.0%, 22) (aOR 0.64 95% CI 0.29, 1.44). CONCLUSIONS: The families of young Indigenous children appear to receive priority for social and emotional wellbeing care in Australian primary care centers, however many Indigenous families are not receiving services. Improvement in resourcing and support of social and emotional wellbeing services in primary care centers is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-2883-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5807859/ /pubmed/29426308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2883-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Edmond, Karen M. McAuley, Kimberley McAullay, Daniel Matthews, Veronica Strobel, Natalie Marriott, Rhonda Bailie, Ross Quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for families of young Indigenous children attending primary care centers; a cross sectional analysis |
title | Quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for families of young Indigenous children attending primary care centers; a cross sectional analysis |
title_full | Quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for families of young Indigenous children attending primary care centers; a cross sectional analysis |
title_fullStr | Quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for families of young Indigenous children attending primary care centers; a cross sectional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for families of young Indigenous children attending primary care centers; a cross sectional analysis |
title_short | Quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for families of young Indigenous children attending primary care centers; a cross sectional analysis |
title_sort | quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for families of young indigenous children attending primary care centers; a cross sectional analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29426308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2883-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edmondkarenm qualityofsocialandemotionalwellbeingservicesforfamiliesofyoungindigenouschildrenattendingprimarycarecentersacrosssectionalanalysis AT mcauleykimberley qualityofsocialandemotionalwellbeingservicesforfamiliesofyoungindigenouschildrenattendingprimarycarecentersacrosssectionalanalysis AT mcaullaydaniel qualityofsocialandemotionalwellbeingservicesforfamiliesofyoungindigenouschildrenattendingprimarycarecentersacrosssectionalanalysis AT matthewsveronica qualityofsocialandemotionalwellbeingservicesforfamiliesofyoungindigenouschildrenattendingprimarycarecentersacrosssectionalanalysis AT strobelnatalie qualityofsocialandemotionalwellbeingservicesforfamiliesofyoungindigenouschildrenattendingprimarycarecentersacrosssectionalanalysis AT marriottrhonda qualityofsocialandemotionalwellbeingservicesforfamiliesofyoungindigenouschildrenattendingprimarycarecentersacrosssectionalanalysis AT bailieross qualityofsocialandemotionalwellbeingservicesforfamiliesofyoungindigenouschildrenattendingprimarycarecentersacrosssectionalanalysis |