Cargando…
Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS)
BACKGROUND: Bereavement can result in severe mental health problems, including persistent, severe and disabling grief symptoms, termed complicated grief. Grief rumination (i.e., repetitive thought about the causes and consequences of the loss) is a malleable cognitive risk-factor in adjustment to be...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29426323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1630-1 |
_version_ | 1783299361292156928 |
---|---|
author | Doering, Bettina K. Barke, Antonia Friehs, Thilo Eisma, Maarten C. |
author_facet | Doering, Bettina K. Barke, Antonia Friehs, Thilo Eisma, Maarten C. |
author_sort | Doering, Bettina K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bereavement can result in severe mental health problems, including persistent, severe and disabling grief symptoms, termed complicated grief. Grief rumination (i.e., repetitive thought about the causes and consequences of the loss) is a malleable cognitive risk-factor in adjustment to bereavement. The Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) was recently developed to assess grief rumination. The present study aimed to develop and validate a German version of the UGRS. METHODS: An online survey including measures of demographic and loss-related variables, grief rumination (UGRS), depressive rumination (brooding and reflection), and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and complicated grief, was administered online among 159 persons (87% women) who had lost a first-degree relative in the past three years. UGRS item analyses, a confirmatory factor analysis and associations of grief rumination with brooding, reflection and symptom levels were performed. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the UGRS was good. The confirmatory factor analysis obtained a good fit for a model with five correlated grief rumination subscales. The UGRS contributed uniquely to the prediction of complicated grief symptoms even when controlling for symptoms of anxiety and depression, brooding, reflection, and demographic and loss-related variables. Discriminant validity of the UGRS was demonstrated by the fact that higher UGRS scores were found in participants with a higher likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of complicated grief (d > 1.60). CONCLUSION: The translated UGRS showed very good psychometric properties and the correlations with maladaptive ruminative styles and complicated grief symptoms demonstrated the clinical relevance of grief rumination. Limitations concerning generalisability of the results are discussed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-018-1630-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5807860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58078602018-02-16 Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) Doering, Bettina K. Barke, Antonia Friehs, Thilo Eisma, Maarten C. BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Bereavement can result in severe mental health problems, including persistent, severe and disabling grief symptoms, termed complicated grief. Grief rumination (i.e., repetitive thought about the causes and consequences of the loss) is a malleable cognitive risk-factor in adjustment to bereavement. The Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) was recently developed to assess grief rumination. The present study aimed to develop and validate a German version of the UGRS. METHODS: An online survey including measures of demographic and loss-related variables, grief rumination (UGRS), depressive rumination (brooding and reflection), and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and complicated grief, was administered online among 159 persons (87% women) who had lost a first-degree relative in the past three years. UGRS item analyses, a confirmatory factor analysis and associations of grief rumination with brooding, reflection and symptom levels were performed. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the UGRS was good. The confirmatory factor analysis obtained a good fit for a model with five correlated grief rumination subscales. The UGRS contributed uniquely to the prediction of complicated grief symptoms even when controlling for symptoms of anxiety and depression, brooding, reflection, and demographic and loss-related variables. Discriminant validity of the UGRS was demonstrated by the fact that higher UGRS scores were found in participants with a higher likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of complicated grief (d > 1.60). CONCLUSION: The translated UGRS showed very good psychometric properties and the correlations with maladaptive ruminative styles and complicated grief symptoms demonstrated the clinical relevance of grief rumination. Limitations concerning generalisability of the results are discussed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-018-1630-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5807860/ /pubmed/29426323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1630-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Doering, Bettina K. Barke, Antonia Friehs, Thilo Eisma, Maarten C. Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) |
title | Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) |
title_full | Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) |
title_fullStr | Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) |
title_short | Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) |
title_sort | assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the german version of the utrecht grief rumination scale (ugrs) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29426323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1630-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doeringbettinak assessmentofgriefrelatedruminationvalidationofthegermanversionoftheutrechtgriefruminationscaleugrs AT barkeantonia assessmentofgriefrelatedruminationvalidationofthegermanversionoftheutrechtgriefruminationscaleugrs AT friehsthilo assessmentofgriefrelatedruminationvalidationofthegermanversionoftheutrechtgriefruminationscaleugrs AT eismamaartenc assessmentofgriefrelatedruminationvalidationofthegermanversionoftheutrechtgriefruminationscaleugrs |