Cargando…

Adherent vs. Free-Floating Neural Induction by Dual SMAD Inhibition for Neurosphere Cultures Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Keeping neural stem cells under proliferation, followed by terminal differentiation, can substantially increase the number of neurons generated. With regard to the usability of proliferating neurospheres (NSPHs) cultures, adherent induction protocols have not yet been studied in comparison to embryo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pauly, Martje G., Krajka, Victor, Stengel, Felix, Seibler, Philip, Klein, Christine, Capetian, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29468156
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2018.00003
_version_ 1783299367267991552
author Pauly, Martje G.
Krajka, Victor
Stengel, Felix
Seibler, Philip
Klein, Christine
Capetian, Philipp
author_facet Pauly, Martje G.
Krajka, Victor
Stengel, Felix
Seibler, Philip
Klein, Christine
Capetian, Philipp
author_sort Pauly, Martje G.
collection PubMed
description Keeping neural stem cells under proliferation, followed by terminal differentiation, can substantially increase the number of neurons generated. With regard to the usability of proliferating neurospheres (NSPHs) cultures, adherent induction protocols have not yet been studied in comparison to embryoid body (EB)-based protocols. To compare these proctocols, neural induction of human induced pluripotent stem cells was performed by dual SMAD inhibition under both adherent and free-floating EB culture conditions. After 10 days, we transferred cells to low-attachment culture plates and proliferated them as free-floating neurospheres. RNA was collected, transcribed to cDNA and analyzed for sonic hedgehog expression that plays an important role during proliferation process. NSPHs were analyzed by immunofluorescence imaging directly and upon continued differentiation. The EB-based approach yielded in higher numbers of cells expressing the neural stem cell marker Nestin, and showed in contrast to the adherent induction protocol increased expression levels of sonic hedgehog. Although improvements to culture consistency and reliability are desirable, the EB-based protocol appears to be superior to the adherent protocol for both, the proliferation and differentiation capacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5807902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58079022018-02-21 Adherent vs. Free-Floating Neural Induction by Dual SMAD Inhibition for Neurosphere Cultures Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Pauly, Martje G. Krajka, Victor Stengel, Felix Seibler, Philip Klein, Christine Capetian, Philipp Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Keeping neural stem cells under proliferation, followed by terminal differentiation, can substantially increase the number of neurons generated. With regard to the usability of proliferating neurospheres (NSPHs) cultures, adherent induction protocols have not yet been studied in comparison to embryoid body (EB)-based protocols. To compare these proctocols, neural induction of human induced pluripotent stem cells was performed by dual SMAD inhibition under both adherent and free-floating EB culture conditions. After 10 days, we transferred cells to low-attachment culture plates and proliferated them as free-floating neurospheres. RNA was collected, transcribed to cDNA and analyzed for sonic hedgehog expression that plays an important role during proliferation process. NSPHs were analyzed by immunofluorescence imaging directly and upon continued differentiation. The EB-based approach yielded in higher numbers of cells expressing the neural stem cell marker Nestin, and showed in contrast to the adherent induction protocol increased expression levels of sonic hedgehog. Although improvements to culture consistency and reliability are desirable, the EB-based protocol appears to be superior to the adherent protocol for both, the proliferation and differentiation capacity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5807902/ /pubmed/29468156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2018.00003 Text en Copyright © 2018 Pauly, Krajka, Stengel, Seibler, Klein and Capetian. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cell and Developmental Biology
Pauly, Martje G.
Krajka, Victor
Stengel, Felix
Seibler, Philip
Klein, Christine
Capetian, Philipp
Adherent vs. Free-Floating Neural Induction by Dual SMAD Inhibition for Neurosphere Cultures Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title Adherent vs. Free-Floating Neural Induction by Dual SMAD Inhibition for Neurosphere Cultures Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title_full Adherent vs. Free-Floating Neural Induction by Dual SMAD Inhibition for Neurosphere Cultures Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title_fullStr Adherent vs. Free-Floating Neural Induction by Dual SMAD Inhibition for Neurosphere Cultures Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title_full_unstemmed Adherent vs. Free-Floating Neural Induction by Dual SMAD Inhibition for Neurosphere Cultures Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title_short Adherent vs. Free-Floating Neural Induction by Dual SMAD Inhibition for Neurosphere Cultures Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title_sort adherent vs. free-floating neural induction by dual smad inhibition for neurosphere cultures derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells
topic Cell and Developmental Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29468156
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2018.00003
work_keys_str_mv AT paulymartjeg adherentvsfreefloatingneuralinductionbydualsmadinhibitionforneurosphereculturesderivedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT krajkavictor adherentvsfreefloatingneuralinductionbydualsmadinhibitionforneurosphereculturesderivedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT stengelfelix adherentvsfreefloatingneuralinductionbydualsmadinhibitionforneurosphereculturesderivedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT seiblerphilip adherentvsfreefloatingneuralinductionbydualsmadinhibitionforneurosphereculturesderivedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT kleinchristine adherentvsfreefloatingneuralinductionbydualsmadinhibitionforneurosphereculturesderivedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT capetianphilipp adherentvsfreefloatingneuralinductionbydualsmadinhibitionforneurosphereculturesderivedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells