Cargando…

Correlations of post-implant regional dosimetric parameters at 24 hours and one month, with clinical results of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlations of post-implant regional dosimetrics at 24 hours (24 h) and 1 month after implant procedures, with clinical outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2014, 130 consecutive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okazaki, Eiichiro, Kuratsukuri, Katsuyuki, Ishii, Kentaro, Tanaka, Tomoaki, Ogino, Ryo, Nishikawa, Tomohiro, Morimoto, Hideyuki, Hosono, Masako, Miki, Yukio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441093
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2017.72547
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlations of post-implant regional dosimetrics at 24 hours (24 h) and 1 month after implant procedures, with clinical outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2014, 130 consecutive patients treated for localized prostate cancer, receiving definitive iodine-125 ((125)I) brachytherapy treatment were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent post-implant CT imaging for dosimetric analysis at 24 h and 1 month after implantation procedure. Prostate contours were divided into quadrants: anterior-superior (ASQ), posterior-superior (PSQ), anterior-inferior (AIQ), and posterior-inferior (PIQ). Predictive factors and cut-off values of biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and toxicities of LDR brachytherapy were analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 69.5 months. Seven patients (5.4%) had biochemical failure. The 3-year and 5-year BFFS rates were 96.7% and 93.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score were significant prognostic factors for biochemical failure. D(90) (the minimal dose received by 90% of the volume) of PSQ and PIQ at 24 h, and D(90) of PSQ at 1 month were also significant factors. The cut-off values of PSQ D(90) were 145 Gy at 24 h and 160 Gy at 1 month. D(90) of the whole prostate was not significant at 24 h and at 1 month. D(90) of PSQ at 1 month was a significant factor for rectal hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Post-implant D(90) of PSQ is significantly associated with BFFS for localized prostate cancer not only at 1 month, but also at 24 hours. D(90) of PSQ at 1 month is also a significant factor for rectal hemorrhage.