Cargando…
Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
INTRODUCTION: The management of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is a complex process in which risk–benefit assessments should be combined with the patient’s perspective. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine patients’ and pharmacists’ preferences regarding DDI management. METHODS: We condu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28965265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7 |
_version_ | 1783299388330737664 |
---|---|
author | Heringa, Mette Floor-Schreudering, Annemieke Wouters, Hans De Smet, Peter A. G. M. Bouvy, Marcel L. |
author_facet | Heringa, Mette Floor-Schreudering, Annemieke Wouters, Hans De Smet, Peter A. G. M. Bouvy, Marcel L. |
author_sort | Heringa, Mette |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The management of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is a complex process in which risk–benefit assessments should be combined with the patient’s perspective. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine patients’ and pharmacists’ preferences regarding DDI management. METHODS: We conducted a choice-based conjoint survey about a fictitious DDI concerning the combination of a cardiovascular drug and an antibiotic for pneumonia. Patients and pharmacists had to choose 12 times between two management options. The options were described by five attributes, including risk, benefit and practical consequences. Each attribute could have two different levels, which were varied over the choice tasks. Latent class analysis was used to identify potential classes of respondents with distinct patterns of similar preferences. RESULTS: In total, 298 patients and 178 pharmacists completed the questionnaire. The latent class model for both patients and pharmacists resulted in three classes. For patients, in one class the most importance was attached to avoiding switch of medication (class probability 20%), in a second class to fewer adverse events (41%), and in a third class to blood sampling (39%). For pharmacists, again one class attached the highest importance to avoiding switch of medication (31%). The other classes gave priority to curing pneumonia (31%) and avoiding blood sampling (38%). CONCLUSION: The results showed diverging preferences regarding DDI management among both patients and pharmacists. Different groups attached different value to risk and benefit versus practical considerations. Awareness of existing variability in preferences among and between pharmacists and patients is a step towards shared decision making in DDI management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5808046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58080462018-02-22 Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Heringa, Mette Floor-Schreudering, Annemieke Wouters, Hans De Smet, Peter A. G. M. Bouvy, Marcel L. Drug Saf Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The management of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is a complex process in which risk–benefit assessments should be combined with the patient’s perspective. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine patients’ and pharmacists’ preferences regarding DDI management. METHODS: We conducted a choice-based conjoint survey about a fictitious DDI concerning the combination of a cardiovascular drug and an antibiotic for pneumonia. Patients and pharmacists had to choose 12 times between two management options. The options were described by five attributes, including risk, benefit and practical consequences. Each attribute could have two different levels, which were varied over the choice tasks. Latent class analysis was used to identify potential classes of respondents with distinct patterns of similar preferences. RESULTS: In total, 298 patients and 178 pharmacists completed the questionnaire. The latent class model for both patients and pharmacists resulted in three classes. For patients, in one class the most importance was attached to avoiding switch of medication (class probability 20%), in a second class to fewer adverse events (41%), and in a third class to blood sampling (39%). For pharmacists, again one class attached the highest importance to avoiding switch of medication (31%). The other classes gave priority to curing pneumonia (31%) and avoiding blood sampling (38%). CONCLUSION: The results showed diverging preferences regarding DDI management among both patients and pharmacists. Different groups attached different value to risk and benefit versus practical considerations. Awareness of existing variability in preferences among and between pharmacists and patients is a step towards shared decision making in DDI management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-30 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5808046/ /pubmed/28965265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Heringa, Mette Floor-Schreudering, Annemieke Wouters, Hans De Smet, Peter A. G. M. Bouvy, Marcel L. Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis |
title | Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis |
title_full | Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis |
title_fullStr | Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis |
title_short | Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis |
title_sort | preferences of patients and pharmacists with regard to the management of drug–drug interactions: a choice-based conjoint analysis |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28965265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heringamette preferencesofpatientsandpharmacistswithregardtothemanagementofdrugdruginteractionsachoicebasedconjointanalysis AT floorschreuderingannemieke preferencesofpatientsandpharmacistswithregardtothemanagementofdrugdruginteractionsachoicebasedconjointanalysis AT woutershans preferencesofpatientsandpharmacistswithregardtothemanagementofdrugdruginteractionsachoicebasedconjointanalysis AT desmetpeteragm preferencesofpatientsandpharmacistswithregardtothemanagementofdrugdruginteractionsachoicebasedconjointanalysis AT bouvymarcell preferencesofpatientsandpharmacistswithregardtothemanagementofdrugdruginteractionsachoicebasedconjointanalysis |