Cargando…

Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

INTRODUCTION: The management of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is a complex process in which risk–benefit assessments should be combined with the patient’s perspective. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine patients’ and pharmacists’ preferences regarding DDI management. METHODS: We condu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heringa, Mette, Floor-Schreudering, Annemieke, Wouters, Hans, De Smet, Peter A. G. M., Bouvy, Marcel L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28965265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7
_version_ 1783299388330737664
author Heringa, Mette
Floor-Schreudering, Annemieke
Wouters, Hans
De Smet, Peter A. G. M.
Bouvy, Marcel L.
author_facet Heringa, Mette
Floor-Schreudering, Annemieke
Wouters, Hans
De Smet, Peter A. G. M.
Bouvy, Marcel L.
author_sort Heringa, Mette
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The management of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is a complex process in which risk–benefit assessments should be combined with the patient’s perspective. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine patients’ and pharmacists’ preferences regarding DDI management. METHODS: We conducted a choice-based conjoint survey about a fictitious DDI concerning the combination of a cardiovascular drug and an antibiotic for pneumonia. Patients and pharmacists had to choose 12 times between two management options. The options were described by five attributes, including risk, benefit and practical consequences. Each attribute could have two different levels, which were varied over the choice tasks. Latent class analysis was used to identify potential classes of respondents with distinct patterns of similar preferences. RESULTS: In total, 298 patients and 178 pharmacists completed the questionnaire. The latent class model for both patients and pharmacists resulted in three classes. For patients, in one class the most importance was attached to avoiding switch of medication (class probability 20%), in a second class to fewer adverse events (41%), and in a third class to blood sampling (39%). For pharmacists, again one class attached the highest importance to avoiding switch of medication (31%). The other classes gave priority to curing pneumonia (31%) and avoiding blood sampling (38%). CONCLUSION: The results showed diverging preferences regarding DDI management among both patients and pharmacists. Different groups attached different value to risk and benefit versus practical considerations. Awareness of existing variability in preferences among and between pharmacists and patients is a step towards shared decision making in DDI management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5808046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58080462018-02-22 Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Heringa, Mette Floor-Schreudering, Annemieke Wouters, Hans De Smet, Peter A. G. M. Bouvy, Marcel L. Drug Saf Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The management of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is a complex process in which risk–benefit assessments should be combined with the patient’s perspective. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine patients’ and pharmacists’ preferences regarding DDI management. METHODS: We conducted a choice-based conjoint survey about a fictitious DDI concerning the combination of a cardiovascular drug and an antibiotic for pneumonia. Patients and pharmacists had to choose 12 times between two management options. The options were described by five attributes, including risk, benefit and practical consequences. Each attribute could have two different levels, which were varied over the choice tasks. Latent class analysis was used to identify potential classes of respondents with distinct patterns of similar preferences. RESULTS: In total, 298 patients and 178 pharmacists completed the questionnaire. The latent class model for both patients and pharmacists resulted in three classes. For patients, in one class the most importance was attached to avoiding switch of medication (class probability 20%), in a second class to fewer adverse events (41%), and in a third class to blood sampling (39%). For pharmacists, again one class attached the highest importance to avoiding switch of medication (31%). The other classes gave priority to curing pneumonia (31%) and avoiding blood sampling (38%). CONCLUSION: The results showed diverging preferences regarding DDI management among both patients and pharmacists. Different groups attached different value to risk and benefit versus practical considerations. Awareness of existing variability in preferences among and between pharmacists and patients is a step towards shared decision making in DDI management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-30 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5808046/ /pubmed/28965265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Heringa, Mette
Floor-Schreudering, Annemieke
Wouters, Hans
De Smet, Peter A. G. M.
Bouvy, Marcel L.
Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
title Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
title_full Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
title_fullStr Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
title_short Preferences of Patients and Pharmacists with Regard to the Management of Drug–Drug Interactions: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
title_sort preferences of patients and pharmacists with regard to the management of drug–drug interactions: a choice-based conjoint analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28965265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7
work_keys_str_mv AT heringamette preferencesofpatientsandpharmacistswithregardtothemanagementofdrugdruginteractionsachoicebasedconjointanalysis
AT floorschreuderingannemieke preferencesofpatientsandpharmacistswithregardtothemanagementofdrugdruginteractionsachoicebasedconjointanalysis
AT woutershans preferencesofpatientsandpharmacistswithregardtothemanagementofdrugdruginteractionsachoicebasedconjointanalysis
AT desmetpeteragm preferencesofpatientsandpharmacistswithregardtothemanagementofdrugdruginteractionsachoicebasedconjointanalysis
AT bouvymarcell preferencesofpatientsandpharmacistswithregardtothemanagementofdrugdruginteractionsachoicebasedconjointanalysis