Cargando…

Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh

This study documents information on significant ethnomedicinal plants, which was collected from the traditional healers of three indigenous communities of Bangladesh. The documented data were quantitatively analyzed for the first time in this area. The information was obtained through open-ended, se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faruque, Mohammad O., Uddin, Shaikh B., Barlow, James W., Hu, Sheng, Dong, Shuang, Cai, Qian, Li, Xiaohua, Hu, Xuebo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00040
_version_ 1783299432474738688
author Faruque, Mohammad O.
Uddin, Shaikh B.
Barlow, James W.
Hu, Sheng
Dong, Shuang
Cai, Qian
Li, Xiaohua
Hu, Xuebo
author_facet Faruque, Mohammad O.
Uddin, Shaikh B.
Barlow, James W.
Hu, Sheng
Dong, Shuang
Cai, Qian
Li, Xiaohua
Hu, Xuebo
author_sort Faruque, Mohammad O.
collection PubMed
description This study documents information on significant ethnomedicinal plants, which was collected from the traditional healers of three indigenous communities of Bangladesh. The documented data were quantitatively analyzed for the first time in this area. The information was obtained through open-ended, semi-structured questionnaires. The benefits, importance and coverage of ethnomedicine were expressed through several quantitative indices including Informant Consensus Factor (ICF), Use Value (UV), Frequency of Citation (FC), Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC) and Relative Importance Index (RI). The agreement of homogeneity between the present and previous studies and among the indigenous communities was evaluated using the Jaccard Index (JI). A total of 159 ethnomedicinal plant species, which were distributed in 132 genera under 62 families, were documented from 174 informants. Of these, 128 plants were native and 31 were exotic. Of a majority of documented species, herbs and leaves were the most utilized plant parts for the preparation of ethnomedicines (45.28%) whereas pastes (63.03%) were the most popular formulations. Among the documented species, the dominant families were the Asteraceae (14 species) and the Lamiaceae (12 species). The highest ICF value was 0.77 for digestive system disorders. Based on UVs, the five most commonly used ethnomedicinal plant species in the study area were Duabanga grandiflora (0.43), Zingiber officinale (0.41), Congea tomentosa (0.40), Matricaria chamomilla (0.33) and Engelhardtia spicata (0.28). The highest RFC was recorded for Rauvolfia serpentina (0.25). The highest RI value was calculated for both Scoparia dulcis and Leucas aspera (0.83). Importantly, 16 species were reported with new therapeutic uses and to our knowledge, 7 species described herein have never been ethnobotanically and pharmacologically studied, viz: Agastache urticifolia, Asarum cordifolium, C. tomentosa, E. spicata, Hypserpa nitida, Merremia vitifolia and Smilax odoratissima. The present study showed that traditional treatment using medicinal plants is still widespread in the study area. Documentation of new ethnomedicinal species with their therapeutic uses shall promote further phytochemical and pharmacological investigations and possibly, lead to the development of new drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5808248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58082482018-02-21 Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh Faruque, Mohammad O. Uddin, Shaikh B. Barlow, James W. Hu, Sheng Dong, Shuang Cai, Qian Li, Xiaohua Hu, Xuebo Front Pharmacol Pharmacology This study documents information on significant ethnomedicinal plants, which was collected from the traditional healers of three indigenous communities of Bangladesh. The documented data were quantitatively analyzed for the first time in this area. The information was obtained through open-ended, semi-structured questionnaires. The benefits, importance and coverage of ethnomedicine were expressed through several quantitative indices including Informant Consensus Factor (ICF), Use Value (UV), Frequency of Citation (FC), Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC) and Relative Importance Index (RI). The agreement of homogeneity between the present and previous studies and among the indigenous communities was evaluated using the Jaccard Index (JI). A total of 159 ethnomedicinal plant species, which were distributed in 132 genera under 62 families, were documented from 174 informants. Of these, 128 plants were native and 31 were exotic. Of a majority of documented species, herbs and leaves were the most utilized plant parts for the preparation of ethnomedicines (45.28%) whereas pastes (63.03%) were the most popular formulations. Among the documented species, the dominant families were the Asteraceae (14 species) and the Lamiaceae (12 species). The highest ICF value was 0.77 for digestive system disorders. Based on UVs, the five most commonly used ethnomedicinal plant species in the study area were Duabanga grandiflora (0.43), Zingiber officinale (0.41), Congea tomentosa (0.40), Matricaria chamomilla (0.33) and Engelhardtia spicata (0.28). The highest RFC was recorded for Rauvolfia serpentina (0.25). The highest RI value was calculated for both Scoparia dulcis and Leucas aspera (0.83). Importantly, 16 species were reported with new therapeutic uses and to our knowledge, 7 species described herein have never been ethnobotanically and pharmacologically studied, viz: Agastache urticifolia, Asarum cordifolium, C. tomentosa, E. spicata, Hypserpa nitida, Merremia vitifolia and Smilax odoratissima. The present study showed that traditional treatment using medicinal plants is still widespread in the study area. Documentation of new ethnomedicinal species with their therapeutic uses shall promote further phytochemical and pharmacological investigations and possibly, lead to the development of new drugs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5808248/ /pubmed/29467652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00040 Text en Copyright © 2018 Faruque, Uddin, Barlow, Hu, Dong, Cai, Li and Hu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Faruque, Mohammad O.
Uddin, Shaikh B.
Barlow, James W.
Hu, Sheng
Dong, Shuang
Cai, Qian
Li, Xiaohua
Hu, Xuebo
Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh
title Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh
title_full Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh
title_fullStr Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh
title_short Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh
title_sort quantitative ethnobotany of medicinal plants used by indigenous communities in the bandarban district of bangladesh
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00040
work_keys_str_mv AT faruquemohammado quantitativeethnobotanyofmedicinalplantsusedbyindigenouscommunitiesinthebandarbandistrictofbangladesh
AT uddinshaikhb quantitativeethnobotanyofmedicinalplantsusedbyindigenouscommunitiesinthebandarbandistrictofbangladesh
AT barlowjamesw quantitativeethnobotanyofmedicinalplantsusedbyindigenouscommunitiesinthebandarbandistrictofbangladesh
AT husheng quantitativeethnobotanyofmedicinalplantsusedbyindigenouscommunitiesinthebandarbandistrictofbangladesh
AT dongshuang quantitativeethnobotanyofmedicinalplantsusedbyindigenouscommunitiesinthebandarbandistrictofbangladesh
AT caiqian quantitativeethnobotanyofmedicinalplantsusedbyindigenouscommunitiesinthebandarbandistrictofbangladesh
AT lixiaohua quantitativeethnobotanyofmedicinalplantsusedbyindigenouscommunitiesinthebandarbandistrictofbangladesh
AT huxuebo quantitativeethnobotanyofmedicinalplantsusedbyindigenouscommunitiesinthebandarbandistrictofbangladesh