Cargando…
Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence highlights the harmful consequences of unemployment on health and well-being. This emphasizes the need to design low-cost interventions to prevent the adverse mental health effects of unemployment. The main aim of this study was to create expert-consensus regarding...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00013 |
_version_ | 1783299452690235392 |
---|---|
author | Santos, Osvaldo Lopes, Elisa Virgolino, Ana Stefanovska-Petkovska, Miodraga Dinis, Alexandra Ambrósio, Sara Heitor, Maria João |
author_facet | Santos, Osvaldo Lopes, Elisa Virgolino, Ana Stefanovska-Petkovska, Miodraga Dinis, Alexandra Ambrósio, Sara Heitor, Maria João |
author_sort | Santos, Osvaldo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence highlights the harmful consequences of unemployment on health and well-being. This emphasizes the need to design low-cost interventions to prevent the adverse mental health effects of unemployment. The main aim of this study was to create expert-consensus regarding development and implementation of a brief, sustainable, and effective intervention program for promoting mental health among unemployed. METHODS: The Delphi technique entailed a selected panel of 75 experts from various relevant professional backgrounds. Panel members were asked to state their level of agreement (5-point Likert scale) regarding (a) required characteristics for an effective mental health intervention for unemployed people and (b) key variables for assessing the effectiveness of that intervention. Consensus was obtained throughout two rounds of data collection through e-mail contact, with structured questionnaires. Items of the questionnaire were based on literature reviews about community-based interventions for unemployed individuals. RESULTS: Overall, 46 experts collaborated with the Delphi process (final participation rate: 61.3%). Based on a review of the literature, 185 items were identified and grouped into two broad categories (set of characteristics of the intervention and set of variables for effectiveness assessment), aggregating a total of 11 dimensions. The two Delphi rounds resulted in the selection of 35 characteristic items for the intervention program and 54 variables for its effectiveness assessment. Brief group interventions were considered to be effective and sustainable for mental health promotion in unemployment conditions if targeting mental health literacy, training interpersonal skills, and job-search skills. CONCLUSION: As agreed by the panel of experts, a brief, sustainable and effective intervention can be developed and implemented by accounting for unemployed capacity-building for mental health self-care and adequate job-searching attitudes and skills. These results should be further implemented in community and multisector-based standardized interventions, targeting mental health among unemployed people, ensuring adequate conditions for its effectiveness assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5808332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58083322018-02-21 Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus Santos, Osvaldo Lopes, Elisa Virgolino, Ana Stefanovska-Petkovska, Miodraga Dinis, Alexandra Ambrósio, Sara Heitor, Maria João Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence highlights the harmful consequences of unemployment on health and well-being. This emphasizes the need to design low-cost interventions to prevent the adverse mental health effects of unemployment. The main aim of this study was to create expert-consensus regarding development and implementation of a brief, sustainable, and effective intervention program for promoting mental health among unemployed. METHODS: The Delphi technique entailed a selected panel of 75 experts from various relevant professional backgrounds. Panel members were asked to state their level of agreement (5-point Likert scale) regarding (a) required characteristics for an effective mental health intervention for unemployed people and (b) key variables for assessing the effectiveness of that intervention. Consensus was obtained throughout two rounds of data collection through e-mail contact, with structured questionnaires. Items of the questionnaire were based on literature reviews about community-based interventions for unemployed individuals. RESULTS: Overall, 46 experts collaborated with the Delphi process (final participation rate: 61.3%). Based on a review of the literature, 185 items were identified and grouped into two broad categories (set of characteristics of the intervention and set of variables for effectiveness assessment), aggregating a total of 11 dimensions. The two Delphi rounds resulted in the selection of 35 characteristic items for the intervention program and 54 variables for its effectiveness assessment. Brief group interventions were considered to be effective and sustainable for mental health promotion in unemployment conditions if targeting mental health literacy, training interpersonal skills, and job-search skills. CONCLUSION: As agreed by the panel of experts, a brief, sustainable and effective intervention can be developed and implemented by accounting for unemployed capacity-building for mental health self-care and adequate job-searching attitudes and skills. These results should be further implemented in community and multisector-based standardized interventions, targeting mental health among unemployed people, ensuring adequate conditions for its effectiveness assessment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5808332/ /pubmed/29467680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00013 Text en Copyright © 2018 Santos, Lopes, Virgolino, Stefanovska-Petkovska, Dinis, Ambrósio and Heitor. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Santos, Osvaldo Lopes, Elisa Virgolino, Ana Stefanovska-Petkovska, Miodraga Dinis, Alexandra Ambrósio, Sara Heitor, Maria João Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus |
title | Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus |
title_full | Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus |
title_fullStr | Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus |
title_short | Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus |
title_sort | defining a brief intervention for the promotion of psychological well-being among unemployed individuals through expert consensus |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santososvaldo definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus AT lopeselisa definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus AT virgolinoana definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus AT stefanovskapetkovskamiodraga definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus AT dinisalexandra definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus AT ambrosiosara definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus AT heitormariajoao definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus |