Cargando…

Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence highlights the harmful consequences of unemployment on health and well-being. This emphasizes the need to design low-cost interventions to prevent the adverse mental health effects of unemployment. The main aim of this study was to create expert-consensus regarding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Osvaldo, Lopes, Elisa, Virgolino, Ana, Stefanovska-Petkovska, Miodraga, Dinis, Alexandra, Ambrósio, Sara, Heitor, Maria João
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00013
_version_ 1783299452690235392
author Santos, Osvaldo
Lopes, Elisa
Virgolino, Ana
Stefanovska-Petkovska, Miodraga
Dinis, Alexandra
Ambrósio, Sara
Heitor, Maria João
author_facet Santos, Osvaldo
Lopes, Elisa
Virgolino, Ana
Stefanovska-Petkovska, Miodraga
Dinis, Alexandra
Ambrósio, Sara
Heitor, Maria João
author_sort Santos, Osvaldo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence highlights the harmful consequences of unemployment on health and well-being. This emphasizes the need to design low-cost interventions to prevent the adverse mental health effects of unemployment. The main aim of this study was to create expert-consensus regarding development and implementation of a brief, sustainable, and effective intervention program for promoting mental health among unemployed. METHODS: The Delphi technique entailed a selected panel of 75 experts from various relevant professional backgrounds. Panel members were asked to state their level of agreement (5-point Likert scale) regarding (a) required characteristics for an effective mental health intervention for unemployed people and (b) key variables for assessing the effectiveness of that intervention. Consensus was obtained throughout two rounds of data collection through e-mail contact, with structured questionnaires. Items of the questionnaire were based on literature reviews about community-based interventions for unemployed individuals. RESULTS: Overall, 46 experts collaborated with the Delphi process (final participation rate: 61.3%). Based on a review of the literature, 185 items were identified and grouped into two broad categories (set of characteristics of the intervention and set of variables for effectiveness assessment), aggregating a total of 11 dimensions. The two Delphi rounds resulted in the selection of 35 characteristic items for the intervention program and 54 variables for its effectiveness assessment. Brief group interventions were considered to be effective and sustainable for mental health promotion in unemployment conditions if targeting mental health literacy, training interpersonal skills, and job-search skills. CONCLUSION: As agreed by the panel of experts, a brief, sustainable and effective intervention can be developed and implemented by accounting for unemployed capacity-building for mental health self-care and adequate job-searching attitudes and skills. These results should be further implemented in community and multisector-based standardized interventions, targeting mental health among unemployed people, ensuring adequate conditions for its effectiveness assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5808332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58083322018-02-21 Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus Santos, Osvaldo Lopes, Elisa Virgolino, Ana Stefanovska-Petkovska, Miodraga Dinis, Alexandra Ambrósio, Sara Heitor, Maria João Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence highlights the harmful consequences of unemployment on health and well-being. This emphasizes the need to design low-cost interventions to prevent the adverse mental health effects of unemployment. The main aim of this study was to create expert-consensus regarding development and implementation of a brief, sustainable, and effective intervention program for promoting mental health among unemployed. METHODS: The Delphi technique entailed a selected panel of 75 experts from various relevant professional backgrounds. Panel members were asked to state their level of agreement (5-point Likert scale) regarding (a) required characteristics for an effective mental health intervention for unemployed people and (b) key variables for assessing the effectiveness of that intervention. Consensus was obtained throughout two rounds of data collection through e-mail contact, with structured questionnaires. Items of the questionnaire were based on literature reviews about community-based interventions for unemployed individuals. RESULTS: Overall, 46 experts collaborated with the Delphi process (final participation rate: 61.3%). Based on a review of the literature, 185 items were identified and grouped into two broad categories (set of characteristics of the intervention and set of variables for effectiveness assessment), aggregating a total of 11 dimensions. The two Delphi rounds resulted in the selection of 35 characteristic items for the intervention program and 54 variables for its effectiveness assessment. Brief group interventions were considered to be effective and sustainable for mental health promotion in unemployment conditions if targeting mental health literacy, training interpersonal skills, and job-search skills. CONCLUSION: As agreed by the panel of experts, a brief, sustainable and effective intervention can be developed and implemented by accounting for unemployed capacity-building for mental health self-care and adequate job-searching attitudes and skills. These results should be further implemented in community and multisector-based standardized interventions, targeting mental health among unemployed people, ensuring adequate conditions for its effectiveness assessment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5808332/ /pubmed/29467680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00013 Text en Copyright © 2018 Santos, Lopes, Virgolino, Stefanovska-Petkovska, Dinis, Ambrósio and Heitor. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Santos, Osvaldo
Lopes, Elisa
Virgolino, Ana
Stefanovska-Petkovska, Miodraga
Dinis, Alexandra
Ambrósio, Sara
Heitor, Maria João
Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus
title Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus
title_full Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus
title_fullStr Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus
title_full_unstemmed Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus
title_short Defining a Brief Intervention for the Promotion of Psychological Well-being among Unemployed Individuals through Expert Consensus
title_sort defining a brief intervention for the promotion of psychological well-being among unemployed individuals through expert consensus
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00013
work_keys_str_mv AT santososvaldo definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus
AT lopeselisa definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus
AT virgolinoana definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus
AT stefanovskapetkovskamiodraga definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus
AT dinisalexandra definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus
AT ambrosiosara definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus
AT heitormariajoao definingabriefinterventionforthepromotionofpsychologicalwellbeingamongunemployedindividualsthroughexpertconsensus