Cargando…

Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review

Chlamydia trachomatis (hereafter CT) is Gram-negative, obligate intracellular pathogen. It causes the world's most common non-viral sexually transmitted disease. India is home to the world's greatest burden of infectious diseases, yet information on prevalence rates of CT is scarce. This a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Pierre, Spaargaren, Joke, Kant, Rajiv, Lawrence, Rubina, Dayal, Arvind, Lal, Jonathan A., Morré, Servaas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28582495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx055
_version_ 1783299484929753088
author Thomas, Pierre
Spaargaren, Joke
Kant, Rajiv
Lawrence, Rubina
Dayal, Arvind
Lal, Jonathan A.
Morré, Servaas A.
author_facet Thomas, Pierre
Spaargaren, Joke
Kant, Rajiv
Lawrence, Rubina
Dayal, Arvind
Lal, Jonathan A.
Morré, Servaas A.
author_sort Thomas, Pierre
collection PubMed
description Chlamydia trachomatis (hereafter CT) is Gram-negative, obligate intracellular pathogen. It causes the world's most common non-viral sexually transmitted disease. India is home to the world's greatest burden of infectious diseases, yet information on prevalence rates of CT is scarce. This article systematically reviews the literature for the prevalence rates and testing methods in India. A total of 27 studies were included. Four main patients groups (symptomatic women, infertile women, pregnant women and asymptomatic population groups) could be identified with varying rates of CT (0.1%–32% using PCR, 2.4%–75% using ELISA serology). Most of the studies originated from urban settings, 11 of them from New Delhi. In-house PCR was the most common diagnostic technique used generating the following ranges in prevalence for the four group studies: symptomatic women 10%–50%, pregnant women 0.1%–2.5% and asymptomatic populations 0.9%–24.5%. The rates among infertile women were 9%–68% based on serology results. The prevalence rates featured in this paper are in line with other locations across the Indian subcontinent. This review highlights the extreme heterogeneity in the limited studies available in India on CT and the need for standardized guidelines for diagnosis and management of CT in India. The availability of resources should be considered in the formulation of recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5808648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58086482018-02-15 Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review Thomas, Pierre Spaargaren, Joke Kant, Rajiv Lawrence, Rubina Dayal, Arvind Lal, Jonathan A. Morré, Servaas A. Pathog Dis Research Article Chlamydia trachomatis (hereafter CT) is Gram-negative, obligate intracellular pathogen. It causes the world's most common non-viral sexually transmitted disease. India is home to the world's greatest burden of infectious diseases, yet information on prevalence rates of CT is scarce. This article systematically reviews the literature for the prevalence rates and testing methods in India. A total of 27 studies were included. Four main patients groups (symptomatic women, infertile women, pregnant women and asymptomatic population groups) could be identified with varying rates of CT (0.1%–32% using PCR, 2.4%–75% using ELISA serology). Most of the studies originated from urban settings, 11 of them from New Delhi. In-house PCR was the most common diagnostic technique used generating the following ranges in prevalence for the four group studies: symptomatic women 10%–50%, pregnant women 0.1%–2.5% and asymptomatic populations 0.9%–24.5%. The rates among infertile women were 9%–68% based on serology results. The prevalence rates featured in this paper are in line with other locations across the Indian subcontinent. This review highlights the extreme heterogeneity in the limited studies available in India on CT and the need for standardized guidelines for diagnosis and management of CT in India. The availability of resources should be considered in the formulation of recommendations. Oxford University Press 2017-06-04 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5808648/ /pubmed/28582495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx055 Text en © FEMS 2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Article
Thomas, Pierre
Spaargaren, Joke
Kant, Rajiv
Lawrence, Rubina
Dayal, Arvind
Lal, Jonathan A.
Morré, Servaas A.
Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review
title Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review
title_full Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review
title_short Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review
title_sort burden of chlamydia trachomatis in india: a systematic literature review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28582495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx055
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaspierre burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT spaargarenjoke burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT kantrajiv burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT lawrencerubina burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT dayalarvind burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT laljonathana burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT morreservaasa burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview