Cargando…
Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review
Chlamydia trachomatis (hereafter CT) is Gram-negative, obligate intracellular pathogen. It causes the world's most common non-viral sexually transmitted disease. India is home to the world's greatest burden of infectious diseases, yet information on prevalence rates of CT is scarce. This a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28582495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx055 |
_version_ | 1783299484929753088 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Pierre Spaargaren, Joke Kant, Rajiv Lawrence, Rubina Dayal, Arvind Lal, Jonathan A. Morré, Servaas A. |
author_facet | Thomas, Pierre Spaargaren, Joke Kant, Rajiv Lawrence, Rubina Dayal, Arvind Lal, Jonathan A. Morré, Servaas A. |
author_sort | Thomas, Pierre |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chlamydia trachomatis (hereafter CT) is Gram-negative, obligate intracellular pathogen. It causes the world's most common non-viral sexually transmitted disease. India is home to the world's greatest burden of infectious diseases, yet information on prevalence rates of CT is scarce. This article systematically reviews the literature for the prevalence rates and testing methods in India. A total of 27 studies were included. Four main patients groups (symptomatic women, infertile women, pregnant women and asymptomatic population groups) could be identified with varying rates of CT (0.1%–32% using PCR, 2.4%–75% using ELISA serology). Most of the studies originated from urban settings, 11 of them from New Delhi. In-house PCR was the most common diagnostic technique used generating the following ranges in prevalence for the four group studies: symptomatic women 10%–50%, pregnant women 0.1%–2.5% and asymptomatic populations 0.9%–24.5%. The rates among infertile women were 9%–68% based on serology results. The prevalence rates featured in this paper are in line with other locations across the Indian subcontinent. This review highlights the extreme heterogeneity in the limited studies available in India on CT and the need for standardized guidelines for diagnosis and management of CT in India. The availability of resources should be considered in the formulation of recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5808648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58086482018-02-15 Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review Thomas, Pierre Spaargaren, Joke Kant, Rajiv Lawrence, Rubina Dayal, Arvind Lal, Jonathan A. Morré, Servaas A. Pathog Dis Research Article Chlamydia trachomatis (hereafter CT) is Gram-negative, obligate intracellular pathogen. It causes the world's most common non-viral sexually transmitted disease. India is home to the world's greatest burden of infectious diseases, yet information on prevalence rates of CT is scarce. This article systematically reviews the literature for the prevalence rates and testing methods in India. A total of 27 studies were included. Four main patients groups (symptomatic women, infertile women, pregnant women and asymptomatic population groups) could be identified with varying rates of CT (0.1%–32% using PCR, 2.4%–75% using ELISA serology). Most of the studies originated from urban settings, 11 of them from New Delhi. In-house PCR was the most common diagnostic technique used generating the following ranges in prevalence for the four group studies: symptomatic women 10%–50%, pregnant women 0.1%–2.5% and asymptomatic populations 0.9%–24.5%. The rates among infertile women were 9%–68% based on serology results. The prevalence rates featured in this paper are in line with other locations across the Indian subcontinent. This review highlights the extreme heterogeneity in the limited studies available in India on CT and the need for standardized guidelines for diagnosis and management of CT in India. The availability of resources should be considered in the formulation of recommendations. Oxford University Press 2017-06-04 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5808648/ /pubmed/28582495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx055 Text en © FEMS 2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research Article Thomas, Pierre Spaargaren, Joke Kant, Rajiv Lawrence, Rubina Dayal, Arvind Lal, Jonathan A. Morré, Servaas A. Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review |
title | Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review |
title_full | Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review |
title_short | Burden of Chlamydia trachomatis in India: a systematic literature review |
title_sort | burden of chlamydia trachomatis in india: a systematic literature review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28582495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomaspierre burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview AT spaargarenjoke burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview AT kantrajiv burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview AT lawrencerubina burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview AT dayalarvind burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview AT laljonathana burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview AT morreservaasa burdenofchlamydiatrachomatisinindiaasystematicliteraturereview |