Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis
BACKGROUND: Real-world analyses of treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer are limited. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer using data from an electronic medical record database from community practices a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445301 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150960 |
_version_ | 1783299489488961536 |
---|---|
author | Mahtani, Reshma L Parisi, Monika Glück, Stefan Ni, Quanhong Park, Siyeon Pelletier, Corey Faria, Claudio Braiteh, Fadi |
author_facet | Mahtani, Reshma L Parisi, Monika Glück, Stefan Ni, Quanhong Park, Siyeon Pelletier, Corey Faria, Claudio Braiteh, Fadi |
author_sort | Mahtani, Reshma L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Real-world analyses of treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer are limited. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer using data from an electronic medical record database from community practices across the USA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using fully de-identified data from an independent US electronic medical record platform of patients with metastatic breast cancer initiating single-agent nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel as a first- or second-line treatment from December 1, 2010 to October 6, 2014. The clinical efficacy objectives were time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with 2 types of metastatic breast cancer as follows: 1) hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, and 2) triple-negative disease. RESULTS: This analysis included 925 patients. Patients receiving nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel had significantly longer TTD (median 4.2 vs. 2.8 months, P<0.0001) and TTNT (median 6.0 vs. 4.2 months, P<0.0001); similar outcomes were observed for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative disease. Compared with paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel was associated with significantly longer TTD in patients with triple-negative disease. nab-Paclitaxel was associated with significantly less all-grade neuropathy, anemia, pain, and diarrhea than paclitaxel. Antiemetic and antihistamine use were significantly less frequent with nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel, whereas use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, hydrating agents, and bone-directed therapy to decrease skeletal-related events were more frequent. CONCLUSION: nab-Paclitaxel demonstrated improved clinical effectiveness compared with paclitaxel when examining TTD and TTNT in patients with metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5808700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58087002018-02-14 Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis Mahtani, Reshma L Parisi, Monika Glück, Stefan Ni, Quanhong Park, Siyeon Pelletier, Corey Faria, Claudio Braiteh, Fadi Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Real-world analyses of treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer are limited. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer using data from an electronic medical record database from community practices across the USA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using fully de-identified data from an independent US electronic medical record platform of patients with metastatic breast cancer initiating single-agent nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel as a first- or second-line treatment from December 1, 2010 to October 6, 2014. The clinical efficacy objectives were time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with 2 types of metastatic breast cancer as follows: 1) hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, and 2) triple-negative disease. RESULTS: This analysis included 925 patients. Patients receiving nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel had significantly longer TTD (median 4.2 vs. 2.8 months, P<0.0001) and TTNT (median 6.0 vs. 4.2 months, P<0.0001); similar outcomes were observed for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative disease. Compared with paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel was associated with significantly longer TTD in patients with triple-negative disease. nab-Paclitaxel was associated with significantly less all-grade neuropathy, anemia, pain, and diarrhea than paclitaxel. Antiemetic and antihistamine use were significantly less frequent with nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel, whereas use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, hydrating agents, and bone-directed therapy to decrease skeletal-related events were more frequent. CONCLUSION: nab-Paclitaxel demonstrated improved clinical effectiveness compared with paclitaxel when examining TTD and TTNT in patients with metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting. Dove Medical Press 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5808700/ /pubmed/29445301 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150960 Text en © 2018 Mahtani et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mahtani, Reshma L Parisi, Monika Glück, Stefan Ni, Quanhong Park, Siyeon Pelletier, Corey Faria, Claudio Braiteh, Fadi Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis |
title | Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a us community-based real-world analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445301 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahtanireshmal comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis AT parisimonika comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis AT gluckstefan comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis AT niquanhong comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis AT parksiyeon comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis AT pelletiercorey comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis AT fariaclaudio comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis AT braitehfadi comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis |