Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis

BACKGROUND: Real-world analyses of treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer are limited. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer using data from an electronic medical record database from community practices a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahtani, Reshma L, Parisi, Monika, Glück, Stefan, Ni, Quanhong, Park, Siyeon, Pelletier, Corey, Faria, Claudio, Braiteh, Fadi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445301
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150960
_version_ 1783299489488961536
author Mahtani, Reshma L
Parisi, Monika
Glück, Stefan
Ni, Quanhong
Park, Siyeon
Pelletier, Corey
Faria, Claudio
Braiteh, Fadi
author_facet Mahtani, Reshma L
Parisi, Monika
Glück, Stefan
Ni, Quanhong
Park, Siyeon
Pelletier, Corey
Faria, Claudio
Braiteh, Fadi
author_sort Mahtani, Reshma L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Real-world analyses of treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer are limited. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer using data from an electronic medical record database from community practices across the USA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using fully de-identified data from an independent US electronic medical record platform of patients with metastatic breast cancer initiating single-agent nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel as a first- or second-line treatment from December 1, 2010 to October 6, 2014. The clinical efficacy objectives were time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with 2 types of metastatic breast cancer as follows: 1) hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, and 2) triple-negative disease. RESULTS: This analysis included 925 patients. Patients receiving nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel had significantly longer TTD (median 4.2 vs. 2.8 months, P<0.0001) and TTNT (median 6.0 vs. 4.2 months, P<0.0001); similar outcomes were observed for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative disease. Compared with paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel was associated with significantly longer TTD in patients with triple-negative disease. nab-Paclitaxel was associated with significantly less all-grade neuropathy, anemia, pain, and diarrhea than paclitaxel. Antiemetic and antihistamine use were significantly less frequent with nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel, whereas use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, hydrating agents, and bone-directed therapy to decrease skeletal-related events were more frequent. CONCLUSION: nab-Paclitaxel demonstrated improved clinical effectiveness compared with paclitaxel when examining TTD and TTNT in patients with metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5808700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58087002018-02-14 Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis Mahtani, Reshma L Parisi, Monika Glück, Stefan Ni, Quanhong Park, Siyeon Pelletier, Corey Faria, Claudio Braiteh, Fadi Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Real-world analyses of treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer are limited. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer using data from an electronic medical record database from community practices across the USA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using fully de-identified data from an independent US electronic medical record platform of patients with metastatic breast cancer initiating single-agent nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel as a first- or second-line treatment from December 1, 2010 to October 6, 2014. The clinical efficacy objectives were time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with 2 types of metastatic breast cancer as follows: 1) hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, and 2) triple-negative disease. RESULTS: This analysis included 925 patients. Patients receiving nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel had significantly longer TTD (median 4.2 vs. 2.8 months, P<0.0001) and TTNT (median 6.0 vs. 4.2 months, P<0.0001); similar outcomes were observed for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative disease. Compared with paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel was associated with significantly longer TTD in patients with triple-negative disease. nab-Paclitaxel was associated with significantly less all-grade neuropathy, anemia, pain, and diarrhea than paclitaxel. Antiemetic and antihistamine use were significantly less frequent with nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel, whereas use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, hydrating agents, and bone-directed therapy to decrease skeletal-related events were more frequent. CONCLUSION: nab-Paclitaxel demonstrated improved clinical effectiveness compared with paclitaxel when examining TTD and TTNT in patients with metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting. Dove Medical Press 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5808700/ /pubmed/29445301 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150960 Text en © 2018 Mahtani et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mahtani, Reshma L
Parisi, Monika
Glück, Stefan
Ni, Quanhong
Park, Siyeon
Pelletier, Corey
Faria, Claudio
Braiteh, Fadi
Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis
title Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis
title_full Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis
title_short Comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a US community-based real-world analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of early-line nab-paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a us community-based real-world analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445301
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150960
work_keys_str_mv AT mahtanireshmal comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis
AT parisimonika comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis
AT gluckstefan comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis
AT niquanhong comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis
AT parksiyeon comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis
AT pelletiercorey comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis
AT fariaclaudio comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis
AT braitehfadi comparativeeffectivenessofearlylinenabpaclitaxelvspaclitaxelinpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancerauscommunitybasedrealworldanalysis