Cargando…

CT densitometry in emphysema: a systematic review of its clinical utility

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between computed tomography (CT) densitometry and routine clinical markers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency (AATD). METHODS: Multiple databases were searched using a combi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crossley, Diana, Renton, Mary, Khan, Muhammad, Low, Emma V, Turner, Alice M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445272
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S143066
_version_ 1783299491898589184
author Crossley, Diana
Renton, Mary
Khan, Muhammad
Low, Emma V
Turner, Alice M
author_facet Crossley, Diana
Renton, Mary
Khan, Muhammad
Low, Emma V
Turner, Alice M
author_sort Crossley, Diana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between computed tomography (CT) densitometry and routine clinical markers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency (AATD). METHODS: Multiple databases were searched using a combination of pertinent terms and those articles relating quantitatively measured CT densitometry to clinical outcomes. Studies that used visual scoring only were excluded, as were those measured in expiration only. A thorough review of abstracts and full manuscripts was conducted by 2 reviewers; data extraction and assessment of bias was conducted by 1 reviewer and the 4 reviewers independently assessed for quality. Pooled correlation coefficients were calculated, and heterogeneity was explored. RESULTS: A total of 112 studies were identified, 82 being suitable for meta-analysis. The most commonly used density threshold was −950 HU, and a significant association between CT density and all included clinical parameters was demonstrated. There was marked heterogeneity between studies secondary to large variety of disease severity within commonly included cohorts and differences in CT acquisition parameters. CONCLUSION: CT density shows a good relationship to clinically relevant parameters; however, study heterogeneity and lack of longitudinal data mean that it is difficult to compare studies or derive a minimal clinically important difference. We recommend that international consensus is reached to standardize CT conduct and analysis in future COPD and AATD studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5808715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58087152018-02-14 CT densitometry in emphysema: a systematic review of its clinical utility Crossley, Diana Renton, Mary Khan, Muhammad Low, Emma V Turner, Alice M Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between computed tomography (CT) densitometry and routine clinical markers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency (AATD). METHODS: Multiple databases were searched using a combination of pertinent terms and those articles relating quantitatively measured CT densitometry to clinical outcomes. Studies that used visual scoring only were excluded, as were those measured in expiration only. A thorough review of abstracts and full manuscripts was conducted by 2 reviewers; data extraction and assessment of bias was conducted by 1 reviewer and the 4 reviewers independently assessed for quality. Pooled correlation coefficients were calculated, and heterogeneity was explored. RESULTS: A total of 112 studies were identified, 82 being suitable for meta-analysis. The most commonly used density threshold was −950 HU, and a significant association between CT density and all included clinical parameters was demonstrated. There was marked heterogeneity between studies secondary to large variety of disease severity within commonly included cohorts and differences in CT acquisition parameters. CONCLUSION: CT density shows a good relationship to clinically relevant parameters; however, study heterogeneity and lack of longitudinal data mean that it is difficult to compare studies or derive a minimal clinically important difference. We recommend that international consensus is reached to standardize CT conduct and analysis in future COPD and AATD studies. Dove Medical Press 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5808715/ /pubmed/29445272 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S143066 Text en © 2018 Crossley et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Crossley, Diana
Renton, Mary
Khan, Muhammad
Low, Emma V
Turner, Alice M
CT densitometry in emphysema: a systematic review of its clinical utility
title CT densitometry in emphysema: a systematic review of its clinical utility
title_full CT densitometry in emphysema: a systematic review of its clinical utility
title_fullStr CT densitometry in emphysema: a systematic review of its clinical utility
title_full_unstemmed CT densitometry in emphysema: a systematic review of its clinical utility
title_short CT densitometry in emphysema: a systematic review of its clinical utility
title_sort ct densitometry in emphysema: a systematic review of its clinical utility
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445272
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S143066
work_keys_str_mv AT crossleydiana ctdensitometryinemphysemaasystematicreviewofitsclinicalutility
AT rentonmary ctdensitometryinemphysemaasystematicreviewofitsclinicalutility
AT khanmuhammad ctdensitometryinemphysemaasystematicreviewofitsclinicalutility
AT lowemmav ctdensitometryinemphysemaasystematicreviewofitsclinicalutility
AT turneralicem ctdensitometryinemphysemaasystematicreviewofitsclinicalutility