Cargando…

The Social Gradient in Tobacco Use Does Not Generalize to Low-Income Urban Communities in India: Findings From a Census Survey

INTRODUCTION: The existence of a social gradient in tobacco use has been clearly established in a number of countries with people with lower socioeconomic status being more likely to use tobacco. It is not clear how far this gradient is evident within severely deprived communities. This study assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarkar, Bidyut K, Shahab, Lion, Arora, Monika, Ahluwalia, Jasjit S, Reddy, K Srinath, West, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27613938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw214
_version_ 1783299492865376256
author Sarkar, Bidyut K
Shahab, Lion
Arora, Monika
Ahluwalia, Jasjit S
Reddy, K Srinath
West, Robert
author_facet Sarkar, Bidyut K
Shahab, Lion
Arora, Monika
Ahluwalia, Jasjit S
Reddy, K Srinath
West, Robert
author_sort Sarkar, Bidyut K
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The existence of a social gradient in tobacco use has been clearly established in a number of countries with people with lower socioeconomic status being more likely to use tobacco. It is not clear how far this gradient is evident within severely deprived communities. This study assessed the association between occupation as a marker of socioeconomic status and use of smoked and smokeless tobacco within “slum” areas of Delhi, India. METHODS: A census survey of 11 888 households, comprising 30 655 adults from 28 low-income communities (14 government-authorized and 14 unauthorized settlements called “Jhuggi-Jhopri/JJ” clusters) was conducted in 2012. The survey assessed age, sex, household size, occupational group, and current tobacco use. Independent associations with tobacco use were conducted using complex samples regression analysis, stratified by gender. RESULTS: A quarter of participants (24.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.5–27.5) used any tobacco. Slightly more people used smoked (14.6%, 95% CI 12.9–16.3) than smokeless (12.6%, 95% CI 10.7–14.8) tobacco, with a small minority being dual users (2.7%, 95% CI 2.1–3.5). Prevalence of any tobacco use was highest in unskilled (45.13%, 95% CI 42.4–47.9) and skilled (46.2%, 95% CI 41.1–51.4) manual occupations and lower in nonmanual (30.3%, 95% CI 26.2–34.7) occupations and those who were unemployed (29.0%, 95% CI 25.3–33.0). This was confirmed in adjusted analysis in men but associations were more complex in women. CONCLUSIONS: Use of smoked and smokeless tobacco in low-income urban communities in India has a complex association with occupational status with both nonmanual occupation and unemployment being associated with lower prevalence of smoked and smokeless tobacco in men. IMPLICATIONS: Tobacco use in high-income countries shows a strong inverse relationship with social grade, income, and deprivation such that use is much more common among those who can least afford it. This study is the first to look at this social gradient in the context of low-income communities in India, finding that both unemployment and nonmanual occupation were associated with lower rates of tobacco use in men. The data present a challenge to existing explanations of the social gradient, requiring further consideration of the conditions under which affordability may work to reduce health inequalities arising from tobacco use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5808735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58087352018-02-15 The Social Gradient in Tobacco Use Does Not Generalize to Low-Income Urban Communities in India: Findings From a Census Survey Sarkar, Bidyut K Shahab, Lion Arora, Monika Ahluwalia, Jasjit S Reddy, K Srinath West, Robert Nicotine Tob Res Brief Report INTRODUCTION: The existence of a social gradient in tobacco use has been clearly established in a number of countries with people with lower socioeconomic status being more likely to use tobacco. It is not clear how far this gradient is evident within severely deprived communities. This study assessed the association between occupation as a marker of socioeconomic status and use of smoked and smokeless tobacco within “slum” areas of Delhi, India. METHODS: A census survey of 11 888 households, comprising 30 655 adults from 28 low-income communities (14 government-authorized and 14 unauthorized settlements called “Jhuggi-Jhopri/JJ” clusters) was conducted in 2012. The survey assessed age, sex, household size, occupational group, and current tobacco use. Independent associations with tobacco use were conducted using complex samples regression analysis, stratified by gender. RESULTS: A quarter of participants (24.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.5–27.5) used any tobacco. Slightly more people used smoked (14.6%, 95% CI 12.9–16.3) than smokeless (12.6%, 95% CI 10.7–14.8) tobacco, with a small minority being dual users (2.7%, 95% CI 2.1–3.5). Prevalence of any tobacco use was highest in unskilled (45.13%, 95% CI 42.4–47.9) and skilled (46.2%, 95% CI 41.1–51.4) manual occupations and lower in nonmanual (30.3%, 95% CI 26.2–34.7) occupations and those who were unemployed (29.0%, 95% CI 25.3–33.0). This was confirmed in adjusted analysis in men but associations were more complex in women. CONCLUSIONS: Use of smoked and smokeless tobacco in low-income urban communities in India has a complex association with occupational status with both nonmanual occupation and unemployment being associated with lower prevalence of smoked and smokeless tobacco in men. IMPLICATIONS: Tobacco use in high-income countries shows a strong inverse relationship with social grade, income, and deprivation such that use is much more common among those who can least afford it. This study is the first to look at this social gradient in the context of low-income communities in India, finding that both unemployment and nonmanual occupation were associated with lower rates of tobacco use in men. The data present a challenge to existing explanations of the social gradient, requiring further consideration of the conditions under which affordability may work to reduce health inequalities arising from tobacco use. Oxford University Press 2017-11 2016-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5808735/ /pubmed/27613938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw214 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Sarkar, Bidyut K
Shahab, Lion
Arora, Monika
Ahluwalia, Jasjit S
Reddy, K Srinath
West, Robert
The Social Gradient in Tobacco Use Does Not Generalize to Low-Income Urban Communities in India: Findings From a Census Survey
title The Social Gradient in Tobacco Use Does Not Generalize to Low-Income Urban Communities in India: Findings From a Census Survey
title_full The Social Gradient in Tobacco Use Does Not Generalize to Low-Income Urban Communities in India: Findings From a Census Survey
title_fullStr The Social Gradient in Tobacco Use Does Not Generalize to Low-Income Urban Communities in India: Findings From a Census Survey
title_full_unstemmed The Social Gradient in Tobacco Use Does Not Generalize to Low-Income Urban Communities in India: Findings From a Census Survey
title_short The Social Gradient in Tobacco Use Does Not Generalize to Low-Income Urban Communities in India: Findings From a Census Survey
title_sort social gradient in tobacco use does not generalize to low-income urban communities in india: findings from a census survey
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27613938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw214
work_keys_str_mv AT sarkarbidyutk thesocialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT shahablion thesocialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT aroramonika thesocialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT ahluwaliajasjits thesocialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT reddyksrinath thesocialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT westrobert thesocialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT sarkarbidyutk socialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT shahablion socialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT aroramonika socialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT ahluwaliajasjits socialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT reddyksrinath socialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey
AT westrobert socialgradientintobaccousedoesnotgeneralizetolowincomeurbancommunitiesinindiafindingsfromacensussurvey