Cargando…

Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study

INTRODUCTION: Manual hyperinflation (MH), a maneuver applied in mechanically ventilated patients to facilitate secretion removal, has large variation in its performance. Effectiveness of MH is usually evaluated by its capacity to generate an expiratory flow bias. The aim of this study was to compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volpe, Marcia S., Naves, Juliane M., Ribeiro, Gabriel G., Ruas, Gualberto, Tucci, Mauro R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29432468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191787
_version_ 1783299521633058816
author Volpe, Marcia S.
Naves, Juliane M.
Ribeiro, Gabriel G.
Ruas, Gualberto
Tucci, Mauro R.
author_facet Volpe, Marcia S.
Naves, Juliane M.
Ribeiro, Gabriel G.
Ruas, Gualberto
Tucci, Mauro R.
author_sort Volpe, Marcia S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Manual hyperinflation (MH), a maneuver applied in mechanically ventilated patients to facilitate secretion removal, has large variation in its performance. Effectiveness of MH is usually evaluated by its capacity to generate an expiratory flow bias. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of MH—and its resulting flow bias—applied according to clinical practice versus according to expert recommendation on mucus movement in a lung model simulating a mechanically ventilated patient. METHODS: Twelve physiotherapists were asked to apply MH, using a self-inflating manual resuscitator, to a test lung as if to remove secretions under two conditions: according to their usual clinical practice (pre-instruction phase) and after verbal instruction to perform MH according to expert recommendation was given (post-instruction phase). Mucus simulant movement was measured with a photodensitometric technique. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF), peak inspiratory pressure (P(IP)), inspiratory time (T(INSP)), tidal volume (V(T)) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were measured continuously. RESULTS: It was found that MH performed post-instruction delivered a smaller V(T) (643.1 ± 57.8 ml) at a lower P(IP) (15.0 ± 1.5 cmH(2)O), lower PIF (38.0 ± 9.6 L/min), longer T(INSP) (1.84 ±0.54 s) and lower PEF (65.4 ± 6.7L/min) compared to MH pre-instruction. In the pre-instruction phase, MH resulted in a mean PIF/PEF ratio of 1.73 ± 0.38 and mean PEF-PIF difference of -54.6 ± 28.3 L/min, both out of the range for secretion removal. In the post-instruction phase both indexes were in the adequate range. Consequently, the mucus simulant was moved outward when MH was applied according to expert recommendation and towards the test lung when it was applied according to clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of MH during clinical practice with PIF higher than PEF was ineffective to clear secretion in a lung model simulating a mechanically ventilated patient. In order to remove secretion, MH should result in an adequate expiratory flow bias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5809045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58090452018-02-28 Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study Volpe, Marcia S. Naves, Juliane M. Ribeiro, Gabriel G. Ruas, Gualberto Tucci, Mauro R. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Manual hyperinflation (MH), a maneuver applied in mechanically ventilated patients to facilitate secretion removal, has large variation in its performance. Effectiveness of MH is usually evaluated by its capacity to generate an expiratory flow bias. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of MH—and its resulting flow bias—applied according to clinical practice versus according to expert recommendation on mucus movement in a lung model simulating a mechanically ventilated patient. METHODS: Twelve physiotherapists were asked to apply MH, using a self-inflating manual resuscitator, to a test lung as if to remove secretions under two conditions: according to their usual clinical practice (pre-instruction phase) and after verbal instruction to perform MH according to expert recommendation was given (post-instruction phase). Mucus simulant movement was measured with a photodensitometric technique. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF), peak inspiratory pressure (P(IP)), inspiratory time (T(INSP)), tidal volume (V(T)) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were measured continuously. RESULTS: It was found that MH performed post-instruction delivered a smaller V(T) (643.1 ± 57.8 ml) at a lower P(IP) (15.0 ± 1.5 cmH(2)O), lower PIF (38.0 ± 9.6 L/min), longer T(INSP) (1.84 ±0.54 s) and lower PEF (65.4 ± 6.7L/min) compared to MH pre-instruction. In the pre-instruction phase, MH resulted in a mean PIF/PEF ratio of 1.73 ± 0.38 and mean PEF-PIF difference of -54.6 ± 28.3 L/min, both out of the range for secretion removal. In the post-instruction phase both indexes were in the adequate range. Consequently, the mucus simulant was moved outward when MH was applied according to expert recommendation and towards the test lung when it was applied according to clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of MH during clinical practice with PIF higher than PEF was ineffective to clear secretion in a lung model simulating a mechanically ventilated patient. In order to remove secretion, MH should result in an adequate expiratory flow bias. Public Library of Science 2018-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5809045/ /pubmed/29432468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191787 Text en © 2018 Volpe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Volpe, Marcia S.
Naves, Juliane M.
Ribeiro, Gabriel G.
Ruas, Gualberto
Tucci, Mauro R.
Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study
title Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study
title_full Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study
title_fullStr Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study
title_short Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study
title_sort effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: a laboratory study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29432468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191787
work_keys_str_mv AT volpemarcias effectsofmanualhyperinflationclinicalpracticeversusexpertrecommendationondisplacementofmucussimulantalaboratorystudy
AT navesjulianem effectsofmanualhyperinflationclinicalpracticeversusexpertrecommendationondisplacementofmucussimulantalaboratorystudy
AT ribeirogabrielg effectsofmanualhyperinflationclinicalpracticeversusexpertrecommendationondisplacementofmucussimulantalaboratorystudy
AT ruasgualberto effectsofmanualhyperinflationclinicalpracticeversusexpertrecommendationondisplacementofmucussimulantalaboratorystudy
AT tuccimauror effectsofmanualhyperinflationclinicalpracticeversusexpertrecommendationondisplacementofmucussimulantalaboratorystudy