Cargando…

Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values

Standardized uptake values (SUVs) are the most widely used quantitative imaging biomarkers in PET. It is important to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured SUVs. Phantom studies seem to be essential for this purpose; however, repetitive phantom scanning is not recommended due to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaneta, Tomohiro, Daisaki, Hiromitsu, Ogawa, Matsuyoshi, Liu, En-Tao, Iizuka, Hitoshi, Arisawa, Tetsu, Hino-Shishikura, Ayako, Yoshida, Keisuke, Inoue, Tomio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29432459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192549
_version_ 1783299526608551936
author Kaneta, Tomohiro
Daisaki, Hiromitsu
Ogawa, Matsuyoshi
Liu, En-Tao
Iizuka, Hitoshi
Arisawa, Tetsu
Hino-Shishikura, Ayako
Yoshida, Keisuke
Inoue, Tomio
author_facet Kaneta, Tomohiro
Daisaki, Hiromitsu
Ogawa, Matsuyoshi
Liu, En-Tao
Iizuka, Hitoshi
Arisawa, Tetsu
Hino-Shishikura, Ayako
Yoshida, Keisuke
Inoue, Tomio
author_sort Kaneta, Tomohiro
collection PubMed
description Standardized uptake values (SUVs) are the most widely used quantitative imaging biomarkers in PET. It is important to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured SUVs. Phantom studies seem to be essential for this purpose; however, repetitive phantom scanning is not recommended due to the decay of radioactivity. In this study, we performed count-based image reconstruction to avoid the influence of decay using two different PET/CT scanners. By adjusting the ratio of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose solution to tap water, a NEMA IEC body phantom was set for SUVs of 4.0 inside six hot spheres. The PET data were obtained using two scanners (Aquiduo and Celesteion; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan). We set the start time for image reconstruction when the total radioactivity in the phantom was 2.53 kBq/cc, and employed the counts of the first 2-min acquisition as the standard. To maintain the number of counts for each image, we set the acquisition time for image reconstruction depending on the decay of radioactivity. We obtained 50 images, and calculated the SUV(max) and SUV(peak) of all six spheres in each image. The average values of the SUV(max) were used to calculate the recovery coefficients to compare those measured by the two different scanners. Bland-Altman analyses of the SUVs measured by the two scanners were also performed. The measured SUVs using the two scanners exhibited a 10–30% difference, and the standard deviation (SD) of the measured SUVs was between 0.1–0.2. The Celesteion always exhibited higher values than the Aquiduo. The smaller sphere exhibited a larger SD, and the SUV(peak) had a smaller SD than the SUV(max). The Bland-Altman analyses showed poor agreement between the SUVs measured by the two scanners. The recovery coefficient curves obtained from the two scanners were considerably different. The Celesteion exhibited higher recovery coefficients than the Aquiduo, especially at approximately 20-mm-diameter. Additionally, the curves were lower than those calculated from the standard 30-min acquisition images. We propound count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured SUVs. These results are also applicable for the standardization and harmonization of SUVs in multi-institutional studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5809066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58090662018-02-28 Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values Kaneta, Tomohiro Daisaki, Hiromitsu Ogawa, Matsuyoshi Liu, En-Tao Iizuka, Hitoshi Arisawa, Tetsu Hino-Shishikura, Ayako Yoshida, Keisuke Inoue, Tomio PLoS One Research Article Standardized uptake values (SUVs) are the most widely used quantitative imaging biomarkers in PET. It is important to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured SUVs. Phantom studies seem to be essential for this purpose; however, repetitive phantom scanning is not recommended due to the decay of radioactivity. In this study, we performed count-based image reconstruction to avoid the influence of decay using two different PET/CT scanners. By adjusting the ratio of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose solution to tap water, a NEMA IEC body phantom was set for SUVs of 4.0 inside six hot spheres. The PET data were obtained using two scanners (Aquiduo and Celesteion; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan). We set the start time for image reconstruction when the total radioactivity in the phantom was 2.53 kBq/cc, and employed the counts of the first 2-min acquisition as the standard. To maintain the number of counts for each image, we set the acquisition time for image reconstruction depending on the decay of radioactivity. We obtained 50 images, and calculated the SUV(max) and SUV(peak) of all six spheres in each image. The average values of the SUV(max) were used to calculate the recovery coefficients to compare those measured by the two different scanners. Bland-Altman analyses of the SUVs measured by the two scanners were also performed. The measured SUVs using the two scanners exhibited a 10–30% difference, and the standard deviation (SD) of the measured SUVs was between 0.1–0.2. The Celesteion always exhibited higher values than the Aquiduo. The smaller sphere exhibited a larger SD, and the SUV(peak) had a smaller SD than the SUV(max). The Bland-Altman analyses showed poor agreement between the SUVs measured by the two scanners. The recovery coefficient curves obtained from the two scanners were considerably different. The Celesteion exhibited higher recovery coefficients than the Aquiduo, especially at approximately 20-mm-diameter. Additionally, the curves were lower than those calculated from the standard 30-min acquisition images. We propound count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured SUVs. These results are also applicable for the standardization and harmonization of SUVs in multi-institutional studies. Public Library of Science 2018-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5809066/ /pubmed/29432459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192549 Text en © 2018 Kaneta et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaneta, Tomohiro
Daisaki, Hiromitsu
Ogawa, Matsuyoshi
Liu, En-Tao
Iizuka, Hitoshi
Arisawa, Tetsu
Hino-Shishikura, Ayako
Yoshida, Keisuke
Inoue, Tomio
Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values
title Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values
title_full Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values
title_fullStr Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values
title_full_unstemmed Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values
title_short Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values
title_sort use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29432459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192549
work_keys_str_mv AT kanetatomohiro useofcountbasedimagereconstructiontoevaluatethevariabilityandrepeatabilityofmeasuredstandardiseduptakevalues
AT daisakihiromitsu useofcountbasedimagereconstructiontoevaluatethevariabilityandrepeatabilityofmeasuredstandardiseduptakevalues
AT ogawamatsuyoshi useofcountbasedimagereconstructiontoevaluatethevariabilityandrepeatabilityofmeasuredstandardiseduptakevalues
AT liuentao useofcountbasedimagereconstructiontoevaluatethevariabilityandrepeatabilityofmeasuredstandardiseduptakevalues
AT iizukahitoshi useofcountbasedimagereconstructiontoevaluatethevariabilityandrepeatabilityofmeasuredstandardiseduptakevalues
AT arisawatetsu useofcountbasedimagereconstructiontoevaluatethevariabilityandrepeatabilityofmeasuredstandardiseduptakevalues
AT hinoshishikuraayako useofcountbasedimagereconstructiontoevaluatethevariabilityandrepeatabilityofmeasuredstandardiseduptakevalues
AT yoshidakeisuke useofcountbasedimagereconstructiontoevaluatethevariabilityandrepeatabilityofmeasuredstandardiseduptakevalues
AT inouetomio useofcountbasedimagereconstructiontoevaluatethevariabilityandrepeatabilityofmeasuredstandardiseduptakevalues