Cargando…

Severe Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Cardioembolic Stroke

BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated that cardioembolism (CE) was prone to develop hemorrhagic transformation (HT), whereas hyper-permeability of blood–brain barrier (BBB) might be one reason for the development of HT. We, thus, aimed to investigate whether the BBB permeability (BBBP) was highe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chang, Shi, Feina, Chen, Zhicai, Yan, Shenqiang, Ding, Xinfa, Lou, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00055
_version_ 1783299552571293696
author Liu, Chang
Shi, Feina
Chen, Zhicai
Yan, Shenqiang
Ding, Xinfa
Lou, Min
author_facet Liu, Chang
Shi, Feina
Chen, Zhicai
Yan, Shenqiang
Ding, Xinfa
Lou, Min
author_sort Liu, Chang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated that cardioembolism (CE) was prone to develop hemorrhagic transformation (HT), whereas hyper-permeability of blood–brain barrier (BBB) might be one reason for the development of HT. We, thus, aimed to investigate whether the BBB permeability (BBBP) was higher in CE stroke than other stroke subtypes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected clinical and imaging database of AIS patients who underwent CT perfusion. Hypoperfusion was defined as Tmax >6 s. The average relative permeability-surface area product (rPS), reflecting the BBBP, was calculated within the hypoperfusion region (rPS(hypo)). CE was diagnosed according to the international Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine predictive value of rPS(hypo) for CE. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors for CE. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients were included in the final analysis [median age, 73 (61–80) years; 75 (40.1%) females; median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 12 (7–16)]. Median rPS(hypo) was 65.5 (35.8–110.1)%. Ninety-seven (51.9%) patients were diagnosed as CE. ROC analysis revealed that the optimal rPS(hypo) threshold for CE was 86.71%. The value of rPS(hypo) and the rate of rPS(hypo)>86.71% were significantly higher in patients with CE than other stroke subtypes (p < 0.05), after adjusting for the potential confounds. CONCLUSION: The extent of BBB disruption is more severe in CE stroke than other stroke subtypes during the hyperacute stage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5809413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58094132018-02-22 Severe Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Cardioembolic Stroke Liu, Chang Shi, Feina Chen, Zhicai Yan, Shenqiang Ding, Xinfa Lou, Min Front Neurol Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated that cardioembolism (CE) was prone to develop hemorrhagic transformation (HT), whereas hyper-permeability of blood–brain barrier (BBB) might be one reason for the development of HT. We, thus, aimed to investigate whether the BBB permeability (BBBP) was higher in CE stroke than other stroke subtypes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected clinical and imaging database of AIS patients who underwent CT perfusion. Hypoperfusion was defined as Tmax >6 s. The average relative permeability-surface area product (rPS), reflecting the BBBP, was calculated within the hypoperfusion region (rPS(hypo)). CE was diagnosed according to the international Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine predictive value of rPS(hypo) for CE. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors for CE. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients were included in the final analysis [median age, 73 (61–80) years; 75 (40.1%) females; median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 12 (7–16)]. Median rPS(hypo) was 65.5 (35.8–110.1)%. Ninety-seven (51.9%) patients were diagnosed as CE. ROC analysis revealed that the optimal rPS(hypo) threshold for CE was 86.71%. The value of rPS(hypo) and the rate of rPS(hypo)>86.71% were significantly higher in patients with CE than other stroke subtypes (p < 0.05), after adjusting for the potential confounds. CONCLUSION: The extent of BBB disruption is more severe in CE stroke than other stroke subtypes during the hyperacute stage. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5809413/ /pubmed/29472890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00055 Text en Copyright © 2018 Liu, Shi, Chen, Yan, Ding and Lou. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Liu, Chang
Shi, Feina
Chen, Zhicai
Yan, Shenqiang
Ding, Xinfa
Lou, Min
Severe Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Cardioembolic Stroke
title Severe Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Cardioembolic Stroke
title_full Severe Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Cardioembolic Stroke
title_fullStr Severe Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Cardioembolic Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Severe Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Cardioembolic Stroke
title_short Severe Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Cardioembolic Stroke
title_sort severe blood–brain barrier disruption in cardioembolic stroke
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00055
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchang severebloodbrainbarrierdisruptionincardioembolicstroke
AT shifeina severebloodbrainbarrierdisruptionincardioembolicstroke
AT chenzhicai severebloodbrainbarrierdisruptionincardioembolicstroke
AT yanshenqiang severebloodbrainbarrierdisruptionincardioembolicstroke
AT dingxinfa severebloodbrainbarrierdisruptionincardioembolicstroke
AT loumin severebloodbrainbarrierdisruptionincardioembolicstroke