Cargando…

Psychopathology Assessment Methods Revisited: On Translational Cross-Validation of Clinical Self-Evaluation Scale and fMRI

We present in this article a study design that combines clinical self-assessment scale, simultaneously administered with fMRI data acquisition. We have used a standard block-design with two different conditions. Each active block consisted of four text statements (items), alternating diagnostically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoyanov, Drozdstoy, Kandilarova, Sevdalina, Borgwardt, Stefan, Stieglitz, Rolf-Dieter, Hugdahl, Kenneth, Kostianev, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472876
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00021
_version_ 1783299567531327488
author Stoyanov, Drozdstoy
Kandilarova, Sevdalina
Borgwardt, Stefan
Stieglitz, Rolf-Dieter
Hugdahl, Kenneth
Kostianev, Stefan
author_facet Stoyanov, Drozdstoy
Kandilarova, Sevdalina
Borgwardt, Stefan
Stieglitz, Rolf-Dieter
Hugdahl, Kenneth
Kostianev, Stefan
author_sort Stoyanov, Drozdstoy
collection PubMed
description We present in this article a study design that combines clinical self-assessment scale, simultaneously administered with fMRI data acquisition. We have used a standard block-design with two different conditions. Each active block consisted of four text statements (items), alternating diagnostically specific (DS) blocks comprising items from von Zerssen depression scale and diagnostically neutral (DN) blocks with items from a questionnaire about general interests. All items were rated on four degree Likert scale, and patients provided responses with corresponding four buttons during the fMRI session. Our results demonstrated that in healthy controls, contrasting the two types of stimuli yielded no residual activations, e.g., the DS did not produce significantly different activations compared to the DN stimuli. Furthermore, the correlation analyses did not find a relationship between brain activations and the total score of the DS statements in this group. However, contrasting the DS stimuli to the DN stimuli in the patients produced significant residual activations in several brain regions: right pre- and postcentral gyrus (including right supramarginal gyrus), left middle frontal gyrus, triangular part of the left inferior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus. The left precuneus demonstrated correlations with the patients’ DS score. In the between-group comparisons, we found residual activations in the right pre- and postcentral gyrus, right supplementary motor area, medial segment of the right precentral gyrus, right superior parietal lobule, left middle frontal gyrus, left superior frontal gyrus, left occipital pole. Our results confirm the possibility of translational cross-validation of a clinical psychological test (von Zerssen’s depression scale) and fMRI. At this stage, however, we can only confirm the sensitivity of the method (its ability to distinguish healthy controls from depressed patients), but we cannot conclude anything about its specificity (distinction from different psychopathology conditions).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5809475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58094752018-02-22 Psychopathology Assessment Methods Revisited: On Translational Cross-Validation of Clinical Self-Evaluation Scale and fMRI Stoyanov, Drozdstoy Kandilarova, Sevdalina Borgwardt, Stefan Stieglitz, Rolf-Dieter Hugdahl, Kenneth Kostianev, Stefan Front Psychiatry Psychiatry We present in this article a study design that combines clinical self-assessment scale, simultaneously administered with fMRI data acquisition. We have used a standard block-design with two different conditions. Each active block consisted of four text statements (items), alternating diagnostically specific (DS) blocks comprising items from von Zerssen depression scale and diagnostically neutral (DN) blocks with items from a questionnaire about general interests. All items were rated on four degree Likert scale, and patients provided responses with corresponding four buttons during the fMRI session. Our results demonstrated that in healthy controls, contrasting the two types of stimuli yielded no residual activations, e.g., the DS did not produce significantly different activations compared to the DN stimuli. Furthermore, the correlation analyses did not find a relationship between brain activations and the total score of the DS statements in this group. However, contrasting the DS stimuli to the DN stimuli in the patients produced significant residual activations in several brain regions: right pre- and postcentral gyrus (including right supramarginal gyrus), left middle frontal gyrus, triangular part of the left inferior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus. The left precuneus demonstrated correlations with the patients’ DS score. In the between-group comparisons, we found residual activations in the right pre- and postcentral gyrus, right supplementary motor area, medial segment of the right precentral gyrus, right superior parietal lobule, left middle frontal gyrus, left superior frontal gyrus, left occipital pole. Our results confirm the possibility of translational cross-validation of a clinical psychological test (von Zerssen’s depression scale) and fMRI. At this stage, however, we can only confirm the sensitivity of the method (its ability to distinguish healthy controls from depressed patients), but we cannot conclude anything about its specificity (distinction from different psychopathology conditions). Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5809475/ /pubmed/29472876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00021 Text en Copyright © 2018 Stoyanov, Kandilarova, Borgwardt, Stieglitz, Hugdahl and Kostianev. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Stoyanov, Drozdstoy
Kandilarova, Sevdalina
Borgwardt, Stefan
Stieglitz, Rolf-Dieter
Hugdahl, Kenneth
Kostianev, Stefan
Psychopathology Assessment Methods Revisited: On Translational Cross-Validation of Clinical Self-Evaluation Scale and fMRI
title Psychopathology Assessment Methods Revisited: On Translational Cross-Validation of Clinical Self-Evaluation Scale and fMRI
title_full Psychopathology Assessment Methods Revisited: On Translational Cross-Validation of Clinical Self-Evaluation Scale and fMRI
title_fullStr Psychopathology Assessment Methods Revisited: On Translational Cross-Validation of Clinical Self-Evaluation Scale and fMRI
title_full_unstemmed Psychopathology Assessment Methods Revisited: On Translational Cross-Validation of Clinical Self-Evaluation Scale and fMRI
title_short Psychopathology Assessment Methods Revisited: On Translational Cross-Validation of Clinical Self-Evaluation Scale and fMRI
title_sort psychopathology assessment methods revisited: on translational cross-validation of clinical self-evaluation scale and fmri
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472876
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00021
work_keys_str_mv AT stoyanovdrozdstoy psychopathologyassessmentmethodsrevisitedontranslationalcrossvalidationofclinicalselfevaluationscaleandfmri
AT kandilarovasevdalina psychopathologyassessmentmethodsrevisitedontranslationalcrossvalidationofclinicalselfevaluationscaleandfmri
AT borgwardtstefan psychopathologyassessmentmethodsrevisitedontranslationalcrossvalidationofclinicalselfevaluationscaleandfmri
AT stieglitzrolfdieter psychopathologyassessmentmethodsrevisitedontranslationalcrossvalidationofclinicalselfevaluationscaleandfmri
AT hugdahlkenneth psychopathologyassessmentmethodsrevisitedontranslationalcrossvalidationofclinicalselfevaluationscaleandfmri
AT kostianevstefan psychopathologyassessmentmethodsrevisitedontranslationalcrossvalidationofclinicalselfevaluationscaleandfmri