Cargando…
A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples
Differences in the composition of the gut microbiota have been associated with a range of diseases using culture-independent methods. Reliable extraction of nucleic acid is a key step in identifying the composition of the faecal microbiota. Five widely used commercial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ext...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Biomedical
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23684993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.05.008 |
_version_ | 1783299590631456768 |
---|---|
author | Claassen, Shantelle du Toit, Elloise Kaba, Mamadou Moodley, Clinton Zar, Heather J. Nicol, Mark P. |
author_facet | Claassen, Shantelle du Toit, Elloise Kaba, Mamadou Moodley, Clinton Zar, Heather J. Nicol, Mark P. |
author_sort | Claassen, Shantelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Differences in the composition of the gut microbiota have been associated with a range of diseases using culture-independent methods. Reliable extraction of nucleic acid is a key step in identifying the composition of the faecal microbiota. Five widely used commercial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction kits (QIAsymphony® Virus/Bacteria Midi Kit (kit QS), ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep™ (kit Z), QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini Kit (kit QA), Ultraclean® Fecal DNA Isolation Kit (kit U) and PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit (kit P)) were evaluated, using human faecal samples. Yield, purity and integrity of total genomic DNA were compared spectrophotometrically and using gel electrophoresis. Three bacteria, commonly found in human faeces were quantified using real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and total bacterial diversity was studied using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) as well as terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). The measurements of DNA yield and purity exhibited variations between the five kits tested in this study. Automated kit QS exhibited the best quality and highest quantity of DNA. All kits were shown to be reproducible with CV values ≤ 0.46 for DNA extraction. qPCR results showed that all kits were uniformly efficient for extracting DNA from the selected target bacteria. DGGE and T-RFLP produced the highest diversity scores for DNA extracted using kit Z (H′ = 2.30 and 1.27) and kit QS (H′ = 2.16 and 0.94), which also extracted the highest DNA yields compared to the other kits assessed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5809576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Elsevier Biomedical |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58095762018-02-14 A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples Claassen, Shantelle du Toit, Elloise Kaba, Mamadou Moodley, Clinton Zar, Heather J. Nicol, Mark P. J Microbiol Methods Article Differences in the composition of the gut microbiota have been associated with a range of diseases using culture-independent methods. Reliable extraction of nucleic acid is a key step in identifying the composition of the faecal microbiota. Five widely used commercial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction kits (QIAsymphony® Virus/Bacteria Midi Kit (kit QS), ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep™ (kit Z), QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini Kit (kit QA), Ultraclean® Fecal DNA Isolation Kit (kit U) and PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit (kit P)) were evaluated, using human faecal samples. Yield, purity and integrity of total genomic DNA were compared spectrophotometrically and using gel electrophoresis. Three bacteria, commonly found in human faeces were quantified using real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and total bacterial diversity was studied using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) as well as terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). The measurements of DNA yield and purity exhibited variations between the five kits tested in this study. Automated kit QS exhibited the best quality and highest quantity of DNA. All kits were shown to be reproducible with CV values ≤ 0.46 for DNA extraction. qPCR results showed that all kits were uniformly efficient for extracting DNA from the selected target bacteria. DGGE and T-RFLP produced the highest diversity scores for DNA extracted using kit Z (H′ = 2.30 and 1.27) and kit QS (H′ = 2.16 and 0.94), which also extracted the highest DNA yields compared to the other kits assessed. Elsevier Biomedical 2013-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5809576/ /pubmed/23684993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.05.008 Text en © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Claassen, Shantelle du Toit, Elloise Kaba, Mamadou Moodley, Clinton Zar, Heather J. Nicol, Mark P. A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples |
title | A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples |
title_full | A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples |
title_short | A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples |
title_sort | comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial dna extraction kits for extraction of dna from faecal samples |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23684993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.05.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claassenshantelle acomparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT dutoitelloise acomparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT kabamamadou acomparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT moodleyclinton acomparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT zarheatherj acomparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT nicolmarkp acomparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT claassenshantelle comparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT dutoitelloise comparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT kabamamadou comparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT moodleyclinton comparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT zarheatherj comparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples AT nicolmarkp comparisonoftheefficiencyoffivedifferentcommercialdnaextractionkitsforextractionofdnafromfaecalsamples |