Cargando…

Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial

Background: Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures are the most commonly performed aesthetic techniques by plastic surgeons. Patients are interested in a pain-free experience. Surgeons desire patient satisfaction and time-efficient utilization of office staff and resources. Clinical evidence exists...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeiderman, Matthew R., Kelishadi, Shahrooz Sean, Tutela, John Paul, Rao, Arun, Chowdhry, Saeed, Brooks, Ronald M., Wilhelmi, Bradon J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Science Company, LLC 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29484087
_version_ 1783299600075980800
author Zeiderman, Matthew R.
Kelishadi, Shahrooz Sean
Tutela, John Paul
Rao, Arun
Chowdhry, Saeed
Brooks, Ronald M.
Wilhelmi, Bradon J.
author_facet Zeiderman, Matthew R.
Kelishadi, Shahrooz Sean
Tutela, John Paul
Rao, Arun
Chowdhry, Saeed
Brooks, Ronald M.
Wilhelmi, Bradon J.
author_sort Zeiderman, Matthew R.
collection PubMed
description Background: Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures are the most commonly performed aesthetic techniques by plastic surgeons. Patients are interested in a pain-free experience. Surgeons desire patient satisfaction and time-efficient utilization of office staff and resources. Clinical evidence exists for use of vapocoolant technology to reduce pain associated with intravenous cannulation in the pediatric population and in hemodialysis patients. Applying vapocoolant technology to facial rejuvenation is a novel approach to decrease pain associated with neurotoxin or filler injection. Methods: A randomized, prospective study was conducted, testing 15 subjects receiving filler injections and another 15 patients receiving neurotoxin injections using a split-face model. The vapocoolant spray used was composed of a 95:5 ratio of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane and 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane. Within each group, individual patients randomly received injection (filler or neurotoxin) alone versus injection (filler or neurotoxin) plus vapocoolant on an equivalent half of his or her face. An independent examiner recorded from each patient on a scale of 1 to 10 perceived pain for injection alone versus injection plus vapocoolant spray. Results were calculated as a percentage change of pain scores experienced after injection for each person between the control (nonvapocoolant) and treatment (vapocoolant) sides of the face. Results: Vapocoolant spray at the time of cosmetic facial injections leads to a 59% decrease in perceived pain score with neurotoxin injections (range, 0%-100% change) and 64% decrease in perceived pain score with filler injections (range, 0%-100% change). These results were statistically significant with P < .05. Conclusion: Vapocoolant spray reduces pain associated with facial rejuvenation procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5809626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Open Science Company, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58096262018-02-26 Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial Zeiderman, Matthew R. Kelishadi, Shahrooz Sean Tutela, John Paul Rao, Arun Chowdhry, Saeed Brooks, Ronald M. Wilhelmi, Bradon J. Eplasty Journal Article Background: Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures are the most commonly performed aesthetic techniques by plastic surgeons. Patients are interested in a pain-free experience. Surgeons desire patient satisfaction and time-efficient utilization of office staff and resources. Clinical evidence exists for use of vapocoolant technology to reduce pain associated with intravenous cannulation in the pediatric population and in hemodialysis patients. Applying vapocoolant technology to facial rejuvenation is a novel approach to decrease pain associated with neurotoxin or filler injection. Methods: A randomized, prospective study was conducted, testing 15 subjects receiving filler injections and another 15 patients receiving neurotoxin injections using a split-face model. The vapocoolant spray used was composed of a 95:5 ratio of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane and 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane. Within each group, individual patients randomly received injection (filler or neurotoxin) alone versus injection (filler or neurotoxin) plus vapocoolant on an equivalent half of his or her face. An independent examiner recorded from each patient on a scale of 1 to 10 perceived pain for injection alone versus injection plus vapocoolant spray. Results were calculated as a percentage change of pain scores experienced after injection for each person between the control (nonvapocoolant) and treatment (vapocoolant) sides of the face. Results: Vapocoolant spray at the time of cosmetic facial injections leads to a 59% decrease in perceived pain score with neurotoxin injections (range, 0%-100% change) and 64% decrease in perceived pain score with filler injections (range, 0%-100% change). These results were statistically significant with P < .05. Conclusion: Vapocoolant spray reduces pain associated with facial rejuvenation procedures. Open Science Company, LLC 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5809626/ /pubmed/29484087 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Journal Article
Zeiderman, Matthew R.
Kelishadi, Shahrooz Sean
Tutela, John Paul
Rao, Arun
Chowdhry, Saeed
Brooks, Ronald M.
Wilhelmi, Bradon J.
Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial
title Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial
title_full Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial
title_fullStr Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial
title_full_unstemmed Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial
title_short Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial
title_sort vapocoolant anesthesia for cosmetic facial rejuvenation injections: a randomized, prospective, split-face trial
topic Journal Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29484087
work_keys_str_mv AT zeidermanmatthewr vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial
AT kelishadishahroozsean vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial
AT tutelajohnpaul vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial
AT raoarun vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial
AT chowdhrysaeed vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial
AT brooksronaldm vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial
AT wilhelmibradonj vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial