Cargando…
Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial
Background: Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures are the most commonly performed aesthetic techniques by plastic surgeons. Patients are interested in a pain-free experience. Surgeons desire patient satisfaction and time-efficient utilization of office staff and resources. Clinical evidence exists...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Open Science Company, LLC
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29484087 |
_version_ | 1783299600075980800 |
---|---|
author | Zeiderman, Matthew R. Kelishadi, Shahrooz Sean Tutela, John Paul Rao, Arun Chowdhry, Saeed Brooks, Ronald M. Wilhelmi, Bradon J. |
author_facet | Zeiderman, Matthew R. Kelishadi, Shahrooz Sean Tutela, John Paul Rao, Arun Chowdhry, Saeed Brooks, Ronald M. Wilhelmi, Bradon J. |
author_sort | Zeiderman, Matthew R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures are the most commonly performed aesthetic techniques by plastic surgeons. Patients are interested in a pain-free experience. Surgeons desire patient satisfaction and time-efficient utilization of office staff and resources. Clinical evidence exists for use of vapocoolant technology to reduce pain associated with intravenous cannulation in the pediatric population and in hemodialysis patients. Applying vapocoolant technology to facial rejuvenation is a novel approach to decrease pain associated with neurotoxin or filler injection. Methods: A randomized, prospective study was conducted, testing 15 subjects receiving filler injections and another 15 patients receiving neurotoxin injections using a split-face model. The vapocoolant spray used was composed of a 95:5 ratio of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane and 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane. Within each group, individual patients randomly received injection (filler or neurotoxin) alone versus injection (filler or neurotoxin) plus vapocoolant on an equivalent half of his or her face. An independent examiner recorded from each patient on a scale of 1 to 10 perceived pain for injection alone versus injection plus vapocoolant spray. Results were calculated as a percentage change of pain scores experienced after injection for each person between the control (nonvapocoolant) and treatment (vapocoolant) sides of the face. Results: Vapocoolant spray at the time of cosmetic facial injections leads to a 59% decrease in perceived pain score with neurotoxin injections (range, 0%-100% change) and 64% decrease in perceived pain score with filler injections (range, 0%-100% change). These results were statistically significant with P < .05. Conclusion: Vapocoolant spray reduces pain associated with facial rejuvenation procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5809626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Open Science Company, LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58096262018-02-26 Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial Zeiderman, Matthew R. Kelishadi, Shahrooz Sean Tutela, John Paul Rao, Arun Chowdhry, Saeed Brooks, Ronald M. Wilhelmi, Bradon J. Eplasty Journal Article Background: Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures are the most commonly performed aesthetic techniques by plastic surgeons. Patients are interested in a pain-free experience. Surgeons desire patient satisfaction and time-efficient utilization of office staff and resources. Clinical evidence exists for use of vapocoolant technology to reduce pain associated with intravenous cannulation in the pediatric population and in hemodialysis patients. Applying vapocoolant technology to facial rejuvenation is a novel approach to decrease pain associated with neurotoxin or filler injection. Methods: A randomized, prospective study was conducted, testing 15 subjects receiving filler injections and another 15 patients receiving neurotoxin injections using a split-face model. The vapocoolant spray used was composed of a 95:5 ratio of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane and 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane. Within each group, individual patients randomly received injection (filler or neurotoxin) alone versus injection (filler or neurotoxin) plus vapocoolant on an equivalent half of his or her face. An independent examiner recorded from each patient on a scale of 1 to 10 perceived pain for injection alone versus injection plus vapocoolant spray. Results were calculated as a percentage change of pain scores experienced after injection for each person between the control (nonvapocoolant) and treatment (vapocoolant) sides of the face. Results: Vapocoolant spray at the time of cosmetic facial injections leads to a 59% decrease in perceived pain score with neurotoxin injections (range, 0%-100% change) and 64% decrease in perceived pain score with filler injections (range, 0%-100% change). These results were statistically significant with P < .05. Conclusion: Vapocoolant spray reduces pain associated with facial rejuvenation procedures. Open Science Company, LLC 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5809626/ /pubmed/29484087 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Journal Article Zeiderman, Matthew R. Kelishadi, Shahrooz Sean Tutela, John Paul Rao, Arun Chowdhry, Saeed Brooks, Ronald M. Wilhelmi, Bradon J. Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial |
title | Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial |
title_full | Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial |
title_fullStr | Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial |
title_short | Vapocoolant Anesthesia for Cosmetic Facial Rejuvenation Injections: A Randomized, Prospective, Split-Face Trial |
title_sort | vapocoolant anesthesia for cosmetic facial rejuvenation injections: a randomized, prospective, split-face trial |
topic | Journal Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29484087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zeidermanmatthewr vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial AT kelishadishahroozsean vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial AT tutelajohnpaul vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial AT raoarun vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial AT chowdhrysaeed vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial AT brooksronaldm vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial AT wilhelmibradonj vapocoolantanesthesiaforcosmeticfacialrejuvenationinjectionsarandomizedprospectivesplitfacetrial |