Cargando…

Optimal propofol dosage for i-gel® insertion in healthy paralyzed patients

BACKGROUND: Propofol is used for supraglottic airway device insertion, often with the i-gel. However, the propofol requirement for i-gel insertion has not been explored in paralyzed patients. This study was performed to explore hemodynamic changes and sedation level with different propofol doses in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Sung-Ae, Sung, Tae-Yun, Cho, Choon-Kyu, Jee, Young Seok, Kang, Po-Soon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441171
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.22
_version_ 1783299605287403520
author Cho, Sung-Ae
Sung, Tae-Yun
Cho, Choon-Kyu
Jee, Young Seok
Kang, Po-Soon
author_facet Cho, Sung-Ae
Sung, Tae-Yun
Cho, Choon-Kyu
Jee, Young Seok
Kang, Po-Soon
author_sort Cho, Sung-Ae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Propofol is used for supraglottic airway device insertion, often with the i-gel. However, the propofol requirement for i-gel insertion has not been explored in paralyzed patients. This study was performed to explore hemodynamic changes and sedation level with different propofol doses in healthy paralyzed patients when the i-gel was inserted. METHODS: A total of 141 patients undergoing a urologic operation were randomly allocated to three groups depending on the propofol dose (1.5, 2, and 2.5 mg/kg; Groups P1.5, P2, and P2.5, respectively). After patients had been administered each propofol dose and rocuronium, the i-gel was inserted and changes in hemodynamic parameters and bispectral index were evaluated. RESULTS: Group P2 showed a lower incidence of complications (17%) such as hemodynamic instability and inadequate sedation than Group P1.5 (55.3%, P < 0.001) or Group P2.5 (40.4%, P = 0.012). The incidence and dose of additional propofol increased in Group P1.5 (51%, median [range]; 20 [0–50]) compared with those in the other groups (0%, 0 [0–0] in Group P2 and 8.5%, 0 [0–50] in Group P2.5, all P < 0.001), and the incidence and dose of additional ephedrine were significantly higher in Group P2.5 (31.9%; 0 [0–20]) than in Group P1.5 (10.6%, P = 0.012; 0 [0–5], P = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: For the stable maintenance of hemodynamic parameters and proper sedation level during i-gel insertion, 2 mg/kg propofol has an advantage over 1.5 mg/kg or 2.5 mg/kg propofol in healthy paralyzed patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5809703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58097032018-02-13 Optimal propofol dosage for i-gel® insertion in healthy paralyzed patients Cho, Sung-Ae Sung, Tae-Yun Cho, Choon-Kyu Jee, Young Seok Kang, Po-Soon Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: Propofol is used for supraglottic airway device insertion, often with the i-gel. However, the propofol requirement for i-gel insertion has not been explored in paralyzed patients. This study was performed to explore hemodynamic changes and sedation level with different propofol doses in healthy paralyzed patients when the i-gel was inserted. METHODS: A total of 141 patients undergoing a urologic operation were randomly allocated to three groups depending on the propofol dose (1.5, 2, and 2.5 mg/kg; Groups P1.5, P2, and P2.5, respectively). After patients had been administered each propofol dose and rocuronium, the i-gel was inserted and changes in hemodynamic parameters and bispectral index were evaluated. RESULTS: Group P2 showed a lower incidence of complications (17%) such as hemodynamic instability and inadequate sedation than Group P1.5 (55.3%, P < 0.001) or Group P2.5 (40.4%, P = 0.012). The incidence and dose of additional propofol increased in Group P1.5 (51%, median [range]; 20 [0–50]) compared with those in the other groups (0%, 0 [0–0] in Group P2 and 8.5%, 0 [0–50] in Group P2.5, all P < 0.001), and the incidence and dose of additional ephedrine were significantly higher in Group P2.5 (31.9%; 0 [0–20]) than in Group P1.5 (10.6%, P = 0.012; 0 [0–5], P = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: For the stable maintenance of hemodynamic parameters and proper sedation level during i-gel insertion, 2 mg/kg propofol has an advantage over 1.5 mg/kg or 2.5 mg/kg propofol in healthy paralyzed patients. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2018-02 2017-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5809703/ /pubmed/29441171 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.22 Text en Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Cho, Sung-Ae
Sung, Tae-Yun
Cho, Choon-Kyu
Jee, Young Seok
Kang, Po-Soon
Optimal propofol dosage for i-gel® insertion in healthy paralyzed patients
title Optimal propofol dosage for i-gel® insertion in healthy paralyzed patients
title_full Optimal propofol dosage for i-gel® insertion in healthy paralyzed patients
title_fullStr Optimal propofol dosage for i-gel® insertion in healthy paralyzed patients
title_full_unstemmed Optimal propofol dosage for i-gel® insertion in healthy paralyzed patients
title_short Optimal propofol dosage for i-gel® insertion in healthy paralyzed patients
title_sort optimal propofol dosage for i-gel® insertion in healthy paralyzed patients
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441171
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.22
work_keys_str_mv AT chosungae optimalpropofoldosageforigelinsertioninhealthyparalyzedpatients
AT sungtaeyun optimalpropofoldosageforigelinsertioninhealthyparalyzedpatients
AT chochoonkyu optimalpropofoldosageforigelinsertioninhealthyparalyzedpatients
AT jeeyoungseok optimalpropofoldosageforigelinsertioninhealthyparalyzedpatients
AT kangposoon optimalpropofoldosageforigelinsertioninhealthyparalyzedpatients