Cargando…
A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices
Most commercially available cochlear implants and hearing aids use microphones as sensors for capturing the external sound field. These microphones are in general located in an external element, which is also responsible for processing the sound signal. However, the presence of the external element...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0454-z |
_version_ | 1783299676954427392 |
---|---|
author | Calero, Diego Paul, Stephan Gesing, André Alves, Fabio Cordioli, Júlio A. |
author_facet | Calero, Diego Paul, Stephan Gesing, André Alves, Fabio Cordioli, Júlio A. |
author_sort | Calero, Diego |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most commercially available cochlear implants and hearing aids use microphones as sensors for capturing the external sound field. These microphones are in general located in an external element, which is also responsible for processing the sound signal. However, the presence of the external element is the cause of several problems such as discomfort, impossibility of being used during physical activities and sleeping, and social stigma. These limitations have driven studies with the goal of developing totally implantable hearing devices, and the design of an implantable sensor has been one of the main challenges to be overcome. Different designs of implantable sensors can be found in the literature and in some commercial implantable hearing aids, including different transduction mechanisms (capacitive, piezoelectric, electromagnetic, etc), configurations microphones, accelerometers, force sensor, etc) and locations (subcutaneous or middle ear). In this work, a detailed technical review of such designs is presented and a general classification is proposed. The technical characteristics of each sensors are presented and discussed in view of the main requirements for an implantable sensor for hearing devices, including sensitivity, internal noise, frequency bandwidth and energy consumption. The feasibility of implantation of each sensor is also evaluated and compared. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5810055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58100552018-02-16 A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices Calero, Diego Paul, Stephan Gesing, André Alves, Fabio Cordioli, Júlio A. Biomed Eng Online Review Most commercially available cochlear implants and hearing aids use microphones as sensors for capturing the external sound field. These microphones are in general located in an external element, which is also responsible for processing the sound signal. However, the presence of the external element is the cause of several problems such as discomfort, impossibility of being used during physical activities and sleeping, and social stigma. These limitations have driven studies with the goal of developing totally implantable hearing devices, and the design of an implantable sensor has been one of the main challenges to be overcome. Different designs of implantable sensors can be found in the literature and in some commercial implantable hearing aids, including different transduction mechanisms (capacitive, piezoelectric, electromagnetic, etc), configurations microphones, accelerometers, force sensor, etc) and locations (subcutaneous or middle ear). In this work, a detailed technical review of such designs is presented and a general classification is proposed. The technical characteristics of each sensors are presented and discussed in view of the main requirements for an implantable sensor for hearing devices, including sensitivity, internal noise, frequency bandwidth and energy consumption. The feasibility of implantation of each sensor is also evaluated and compared. BioMed Central 2018-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5810055/ /pubmed/29433516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0454-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Calero, Diego Paul, Stephan Gesing, André Alves, Fabio Cordioli, Júlio A. A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices |
title | A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices |
title_full | A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices |
title_fullStr | A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices |
title_full_unstemmed | A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices |
title_short | A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices |
title_sort | technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0454-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calerodiego atechnicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices AT paulstephan atechnicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices AT gesingandre atechnicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices AT alvesfabio atechnicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices AT cordiolijulioa atechnicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices AT calerodiego technicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices AT paulstephan technicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices AT gesingandre technicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices AT alvesfabio technicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices AT cordiolijulioa technicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices |