Cargando…

A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices

Most commercially available cochlear implants and hearing aids use microphones as sensors for capturing the external sound field. These microphones are in general located in an external element, which is also responsible for processing the sound signal. However, the presence of the external element...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calero, Diego, Paul, Stephan, Gesing, André, Alves, Fabio, Cordioli, Júlio A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0454-z
_version_ 1783299676954427392
author Calero, Diego
Paul, Stephan
Gesing, André
Alves, Fabio
Cordioli, Júlio A.
author_facet Calero, Diego
Paul, Stephan
Gesing, André
Alves, Fabio
Cordioli, Júlio A.
author_sort Calero, Diego
collection PubMed
description Most commercially available cochlear implants and hearing aids use microphones as sensors for capturing the external sound field. These microphones are in general located in an external element, which is also responsible for processing the sound signal. However, the presence of the external element is the cause of several problems such as discomfort, impossibility of being used during physical activities and sleeping, and social stigma. These limitations have driven studies with the goal of developing totally implantable hearing devices, and the design of an implantable sensor has been one of the main challenges to be overcome. Different designs of implantable sensors can be found in the literature and in some commercial implantable hearing aids, including different transduction mechanisms (capacitive, piezoelectric, electromagnetic, etc), configurations microphones, accelerometers, force sensor, etc) and locations (subcutaneous or middle ear). In this work, a detailed technical review of such designs is presented and a general classification is proposed. The technical characteristics of each sensors are presented and discussed in view of the main requirements for an implantable sensor for hearing devices, including sensitivity, internal noise, frequency bandwidth and energy consumption. The feasibility of implantation of each sensor is also evaluated and compared.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5810055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58100552018-02-16 A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices Calero, Diego Paul, Stephan Gesing, André Alves, Fabio Cordioli, Júlio A. Biomed Eng Online Review Most commercially available cochlear implants and hearing aids use microphones as sensors for capturing the external sound field. These microphones are in general located in an external element, which is also responsible for processing the sound signal. However, the presence of the external element is the cause of several problems such as discomfort, impossibility of being used during physical activities and sleeping, and social stigma. These limitations have driven studies with the goal of developing totally implantable hearing devices, and the design of an implantable sensor has been one of the main challenges to be overcome. Different designs of implantable sensors can be found in the literature and in some commercial implantable hearing aids, including different transduction mechanisms (capacitive, piezoelectric, electromagnetic, etc), configurations microphones, accelerometers, force sensor, etc) and locations (subcutaneous or middle ear). In this work, a detailed technical review of such designs is presented and a general classification is proposed. The technical characteristics of each sensors are presented and discussed in view of the main requirements for an implantable sensor for hearing devices, including sensitivity, internal noise, frequency bandwidth and energy consumption. The feasibility of implantation of each sensor is also evaluated and compared. BioMed Central 2018-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5810055/ /pubmed/29433516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0454-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Calero, Diego
Paul, Stephan
Gesing, André
Alves, Fabio
Cordioli, Júlio A.
A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices
title A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices
title_full A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices
title_fullStr A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices
title_full_unstemmed A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices
title_short A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices
title_sort technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0454-z
work_keys_str_mv AT calerodiego atechnicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices
AT paulstephan atechnicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices
AT gesingandre atechnicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices
AT alvesfabio atechnicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices
AT cordiolijulioa atechnicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices
AT calerodiego technicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices
AT paulstephan technicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices
AT gesingandre technicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices
AT alvesfabio technicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices
AT cordiolijulioa technicalreviewandevaluationofimplantablesensorsforhearingdevices