Cargando…

Master of Public Health programmes in South Africa: issues and challenges

BACKGROUND: The demand for highly skilled public health personnel in low- and middle-income countries has been recognised globally. In South Africa, the need to train more public health professionals has been acknowledged. The Human Resource for Health (HRH) Strategy for South Africa includes the es...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dlungwane, Thembelihle, Voce, Anna, Searle, Ruth, Stevens, Fred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0052-9
_version_ 1783299683413655552
author Dlungwane, Thembelihle
Voce, Anna
Searle, Ruth
Stevens, Fred
author_facet Dlungwane, Thembelihle
Voce, Anna
Searle, Ruth
Stevens, Fred
author_sort Dlungwane, Thembelihle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The demand for highly skilled public health personnel in low- and middle-income countries has been recognised globally. In South Africa, the need to train more public health professionals has been acknowledged. The Human Resource for Health (HRH) Strategy for South Africa includes the establishment of public health units at district and provincial levels. Programmes such as Master of Public Health (MPH) programmes are viewed as essential contributors in equipping health practitioners with adequate public health skills to meet the demands of the health care system. All MPH programmes have been instituted independently; there is no systematic information or comparison of programmes and requirements across institutions. This study aims to establish a baseline on MPH programmes in South Africa in terms of programme characteristics, curriculum, teaching workforce and graduate output. METHODS: A mixed method design was implemented. A document analysis and cross-sectional descriptive survey, comprising both quantitative and qualitative data collection, by means of questionnaires, of all MPH programmes active in 2014 was conducted. The MPH programme coordinators of the 10 active programmes were invited to participate in the study via email. Numeric data were summarized in frequency distribution tables. Non-numeric data was captured, collated into one file and thematically analysed. RESULTS: A total of eight MPH programmes responded to the questionnaire. Most programmes are affiliated to medical schools and provide a wide range of specialisations. The MPH programmes are run by individual universities and tend to have their own quality assurance, validation and assessment procedures with minimal external scrutiny. National core competencies for MPH programmes have not been determined. All programmes are battling to provide an appropriate supply of well-trained public health professionals as a result of drop-out, low throughput and delayed time to completion. CONCLUSION: The MPH programmes have consistently graduated MPH candidates, although the numbers differ by institution. The increasing number of enrolments coupled by insufficient teaching personnel and low graduate output are key challenges impacting on the production of public health professionals. Collaboration amongst the MPH programmes, standardization, quality assurance and benchmarking needs considerable attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5810082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58100822018-02-15 Master of Public Health programmes in South Africa: issues and challenges Dlungwane, Thembelihle Voce, Anna Searle, Ruth Stevens, Fred Public Health Rev Review BACKGROUND: The demand for highly skilled public health personnel in low- and middle-income countries has been recognised globally. In South Africa, the need to train more public health professionals has been acknowledged. The Human Resource for Health (HRH) Strategy for South Africa includes the establishment of public health units at district and provincial levels. Programmes such as Master of Public Health (MPH) programmes are viewed as essential contributors in equipping health practitioners with adequate public health skills to meet the demands of the health care system. All MPH programmes have been instituted independently; there is no systematic information or comparison of programmes and requirements across institutions. This study aims to establish a baseline on MPH programmes in South Africa in terms of programme characteristics, curriculum, teaching workforce and graduate output. METHODS: A mixed method design was implemented. A document analysis and cross-sectional descriptive survey, comprising both quantitative and qualitative data collection, by means of questionnaires, of all MPH programmes active in 2014 was conducted. The MPH programme coordinators of the 10 active programmes were invited to participate in the study via email. Numeric data were summarized in frequency distribution tables. Non-numeric data was captured, collated into one file and thematically analysed. RESULTS: A total of eight MPH programmes responded to the questionnaire. Most programmes are affiliated to medical schools and provide a wide range of specialisations. The MPH programmes are run by individual universities and tend to have their own quality assurance, validation and assessment procedures with minimal external scrutiny. National core competencies for MPH programmes have not been determined. All programmes are battling to provide an appropriate supply of well-trained public health professionals as a result of drop-out, low throughput and delayed time to completion. CONCLUSION: The MPH programmes have consistently graduated MPH candidates, although the numbers differ by institution. The increasing number of enrolments coupled by insufficient teaching personnel and low graduate output are key challenges impacting on the production of public health professionals. Collaboration amongst the MPH programmes, standardization, quality assurance and benchmarking needs considerable attention. BioMed Central 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5810082/ /pubmed/29450077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0052-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Dlungwane, Thembelihle
Voce, Anna
Searle, Ruth
Stevens, Fred
Master of Public Health programmes in South Africa: issues and challenges
title Master of Public Health programmes in South Africa: issues and challenges
title_full Master of Public Health programmes in South Africa: issues and challenges
title_fullStr Master of Public Health programmes in South Africa: issues and challenges
title_full_unstemmed Master of Public Health programmes in South Africa: issues and challenges
title_short Master of Public Health programmes in South Africa: issues and challenges
title_sort master of public health programmes in south africa: issues and challenges
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0052-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dlungwanethembelihle masterofpublichealthprogrammesinsouthafricaissuesandchallenges
AT voceanna masterofpublichealthprogrammesinsouthafricaissuesandchallenges
AT searleruth masterofpublichealthprogrammesinsouthafricaissuesandchallenges
AT stevensfred masterofpublichealthprogrammesinsouthafricaissuesandchallenges