Cargando…

Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation therapy in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or HIT suspect is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Although aPTT correlates well with plasma levels of argatroban and lepirudin in healthy vo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beiderlinden, Martin, Werner, Patrick, Bahlmann, Astrid, Kemper, Johann, Brezina, Tobias, Schäfer, Maximilian, Görlinger, Klaus, Seidel, Holger, Kienbaum, Peter, Treschan, Tanja A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29426286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0475-y
_version_ 1783299702490398720
author Beiderlinden, Martin
Werner, Patrick
Bahlmann, Astrid
Kemper, Johann
Brezina, Tobias
Schäfer, Maximilian
Görlinger, Klaus
Seidel, Holger
Kienbaum, Peter
Treschan, Tanja A.
author_facet Beiderlinden, Martin
Werner, Patrick
Bahlmann, Astrid
Kemper, Johann
Brezina, Tobias
Schäfer, Maximilian
Görlinger, Klaus
Seidel, Holger
Kienbaum, Peter
Treschan, Tanja A.
author_sort Beiderlinden, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation therapy in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or HIT suspect is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Although aPTT correlates well with plasma levels of argatroban and lepirudin in healthy volunteers, it might not be the method of choice in critically ill patients. However, in-vivo data is lacking for this patient population. Therefore, we studied in vivo whether ROTEM or global clotting times would provide an alternative for monitoring the anticoagulant intensity effects in critically ill patients. METHODS: This study was part of the double-blind randomized trial “Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia)”, which compared critically ill patients treated with argatroban or lepirudin. Following institutional review board approval and written informed consent, for this sub-study blood of 35 critically ill patients was analysed. Before as well as 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after initiation of argatroban or lepirudin infusion, blood was analysed for aPTT, aPTT ratios, thrombin time (TT), INTEM CT,INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios and maximum clot firmness (MCF) and correlated with the corresponding plasma concentrations of the direct thrombin inhibitor. RESULTS: To reach a target aPTT of 1.5 to 2 times baseline, median [IQR] plasma concentrations of 0.35 [0.01–1.2] μg/ml argatroban and 0.17 [0.1–0.32] μg/ml lepirudin were required. For both drugs, there was no significant correlation between aPTT and aPTT ratios and plasma concentrations. INTEM CT, INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios, TT and TT ratios correlated significantly with plasma concentrations of both drugs. Additionally, agreement between argatroban plasma levels and EXTEM CT and EXTEM CT ratios were superior to agreement between argatroban plasma levels and aPTT in the Bland Altman analysis. MCF remained unchanged during therapy with both drugs. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients, TT and ROTEM parameters may provide better correlation to argatroban and lepirudin plasma concentrations than aPTT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00798525, registered on 25 Nov 2008 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0475-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5810183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58101832018-02-16 Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial Beiderlinden, Martin Werner, Patrick Bahlmann, Astrid Kemper, Johann Brezina, Tobias Schäfer, Maximilian Görlinger, Klaus Seidel, Holger Kienbaum, Peter Treschan, Tanja A. BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation therapy in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or HIT suspect is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Although aPTT correlates well with plasma levels of argatroban and lepirudin in healthy volunteers, it might not be the method of choice in critically ill patients. However, in-vivo data is lacking for this patient population. Therefore, we studied in vivo whether ROTEM or global clotting times would provide an alternative for monitoring the anticoagulant intensity effects in critically ill patients. METHODS: This study was part of the double-blind randomized trial “Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia)”, which compared critically ill patients treated with argatroban or lepirudin. Following institutional review board approval and written informed consent, for this sub-study blood of 35 critically ill patients was analysed. Before as well as 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after initiation of argatroban or lepirudin infusion, blood was analysed for aPTT, aPTT ratios, thrombin time (TT), INTEM CT,INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios and maximum clot firmness (MCF) and correlated with the corresponding plasma concentrations of the direct thrombin inhibitor. RESULTS: To reach a target aPTT of 1.5 to 2 times baseline, median [IQR] plasma concentrations of 0.35 [0.01–1.2] μg/ml argatroban and 0.17 [0.1–0.32] μg/ml lepirudin were required. For both drugs, there was no significant correlation between aPTT and aPTT ratios and plasma concentrations. INTEM CT, INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios, TT and TT ratios correlated significantly with plasma concentrations of both drugs. Additionally, agreement between argatroban plasma levels and EXTEM CT and EXTEM CT ratios were superior to agreement between argatroban plasma levels and aPTT in the Bland Altman analysis. MCF remained unchanged during therapy with both drugs. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients, TT and ROTEM parameters may provide better correlation to argatroban and lepirudin plasma concentrations than aPTT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00798525, registered on 25 Nov 2008 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0475-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5810183/ /pubmed/29426286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0475-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beiderlinden, Martin
Werner, Patrick
Bahlmann, Astrid
Kemper, Johann
Brezina, Tobias
Schäfer, Maximilian
Görlinger, Klaus
Seidel, Holger
Kienbaum, Peter
Treschan, Tanja A.
Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial
title Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial
title_full Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial
title_fullStr Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial
title_short Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial
title_sort monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29426286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0475-y
work_keys_str_mv AT beiderlindenmartin monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT wernerpatrick monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT bahlmannastrid monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT kemperjohann monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT brezinatobias monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT schafermaximilian monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT gorlingerklaus monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT seidelholger monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT kienbaumpeter monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT treschantanjaa monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial