Cargando…
Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation therapy in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or HIT suspect is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Although aPTT correlates well with plasma levels of argatroban and lepirudin in healthy vo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29426286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0475-y |
_version_ | 1783299702490398720 |
---|---|
author | Beiderlinden, Martin Werner, Patrick Bahlmann, Astrid Kemper, Johann Brezina, Tobias Schäfer, Maximilian Görlinger, Klaus Seidel, Holger Kienbaum, Peter Treschan, Tanja A. |
author_facet | Beiderlinden, Martin Werner, Patrick Bahlmann, Astrid Kemper, Johann Brezina, Tobias Schäfer, Maximilian Görlinger, Klaus Seidel, Holger Kienbaum, Peter Treschan, Tanja A. |
author_sort | Beiderlinden, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation therapy in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or HIT suspect is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Although aPTT correlates well with plasma levels of argatroban and lepirudin in healthy volunteers, it might not be the method of choice in critically ill patients. However, in-vivo data is lacking for this patient population. Therefore, we studied in vivo whether ROTEM or global clotting times would provide an alternative for monitoring the anticoagulant intensity effects in critically ill patients. METHODS: This study was part of the double-blind randomized trial “Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia)”, which compared critically ill patients treated with argatroban or lepirudin. Following institutional review board approval and written informed consent, for this sub-study blood of 35 critically ill patients was analysed. Before as well as 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after initiation of argatroban or lepirudin infusion, blood was analysed for aPTT, aPTT ratios, thrombin time (TT), INTEM CT,INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios and maximum clot firmness (MCF) and correlated with the corresponding plasma concentrations of the direct thrombin inhibitor. RESULTS: To reach a target aPTT of 1.5 to 2 times baseline, median [IQR] plasma concentrations of 0.35 [0.01–1.2] μg/ml argatroban and 0.17 [0.1–0.32] μg/ml lepirudin were required. For both drugs, there was no significant correlation between aPTT and aPTT ratios and plasma concentrations. INTEM CT, INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios, TT and TT ratios correlated significantly with plasma concentrations of both drugs. Additionally, agreement between argatroban plasma levels and EXTEM CT and EXTEM CT ratios were superior to agreement between argatroban plasma levels and aPTT in the Bland Altman analysis. MCF remained unchanged during therapy with both drugs. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients, TT and ROTEM parameters may provide better correlation to argatroban and lepirudin plasma concentrations than aPTT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00798525, registered on 25 Nov 2008 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0475-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5810183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58101832018-02-16 Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial Beiderlinden, Martin Werner, Patrick Bahlmann, Astrid Kemper, Johann Brezina, Tobias Schäfer, Maximilian Görlinger, Klaus Seidel, Holger Kienbaum, Peter Treschan, Tanja A. BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation therapy in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or HIT suspect is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Although aPTT correlates well with plasma levels of argatroban and lepirudin in healthy volunteers, it might not be the method of choice in critically ill patients. However, in-vivo data is lacking for this patient population. Therefore, we studied in vivo whether ROTEM or global clotting times would provide an alternative for monitoring the anticoagulant intensity effects in critically ill patients. METHODS: This study was part of the double-blind randomized trial “Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia)”, which compared critically ill patients treated with argatroban or lepirudin. Following institutional review board approval and written informed consent, for this sub-study blood of 35 critically ill patients was analysed. Before as well as 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after initiation of argatroban or lepirudin infusion, blood was analysed for aPTT, aPTT ratios, thrombin time (TT), INTEM CT,INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios and maximum clot firmness (MCF) and correlated with the corresponding plasma concentrations of the direct thrombin inhibitor. RESULTS: To reach a target aPTT of 1.5 to 2 times baseline, median [IQR] plasma concentrations of 0.35 [0.01–1.2] μg/ml argatroban and 0.17 [0.1–0.32] μg/ml lepirudin were required. For both drugs, there was no significant correlation between aPTT and aPTT ratios and plasma concentrations. INTEM CT, INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios, TT and TT ratios correlated significantly with plasma concentrations of both drugs. Additionally, agreement between argatroban plasma levels and EXTEM CT and EXTEM CT ratios were superior to agreement between argatroban plasma levels and aPTT in the Bland Altman analysis. MCF remained unchanged during therapy with both drugs. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients, TT and ROTEM parameters may provide better correlation to argatroban and lepirudin plasma concentrations than aPTT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00798525, registered on 25 Nov 2008 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0475-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5810183/ /pubmed/29426286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0475-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Beiderlinden, Martin Werner, Patrick Bahlmann, Astrid Kemper, Johann Brezina, Tobias Schäfer, Maximilian Görlinger, Klaus Seidel, Holger Kienbaum, Peter Treschan, Tanja A. Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial |
title | Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial |
title_full | Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial |
title_short | Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial |
title_sort | monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry – a prospectively controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29426286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0475-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beiderlindenmartin monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT wernerpatrick monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT bahlmannastrid monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT kemperjohann monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT brezinatobias monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT schafermaximilian monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT gorlingerklaus monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT seidelholger monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT kienbaumpeter monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT treschantanjaa monitoringofargatrobanandlepirudinanticoagulationincriticallyillpatientsbyconventionallaboratoryparametersandrotationalthromboelastometryaprospectivelycontrolledrandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial |