Cargando…
Is Cervical Bracing Necessary After One- and Two-Level Instrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Randomized Study
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of cervical collars in postoperative care following 1- and 2-level instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: The Cervical Spine Research Society Resident Fellow Grant funded this projec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29456914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217697318 |
_version_ | 1783299784219557888 |
---|---|
author | Overley, Samuel C. Merrill, Robert K. Baird, Evan O. Meaike, Joshua J. Cho, Samuel K. Hecht, Andrew C. Qureshi, Sheeraz A. |
author_facet | Overley, Samuel C. Merrill, Robert K. Baird, Evan O. Meaike, Joshua J. Cho, Samuel K. Hecht, Andrew C. Qureshi, Sheeraz A. |
author_sort | Overley, Samuel C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of cervical collars in postoperative care following 1- and 2-level instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: The Cervical Spine Research Society Resident Fellow Grant funded this project. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing 1- or 2-level ACDF surgery were randomized into groups receiving either no brace or a cervical brace for 6 weeks postoperatively. Neck Disability Index scores were recorded preoperatively and at regular follow-up visits up to 1 year. Computed tomography scans were read 1 year postoperatively to determine fusion rates, and subsidence was measured as change in middle vertebral distance between initial postoperative and 6-month follow-up lateral cervical radiographs. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were in the no-brace group, and 22 patients were in the brace group at final follow-up, with an average age of 50 and 55 years, respectively. The no-brace group had a total of 32 operative levels, whereas the brace group had 38 operative levels. There was no statistically significant difference in 1-year postoperative Neck Disability Index scores between the brace (9.30) and no-brace (6.95) groups (P = .28), in 6-month subsidence of all operative levels between the brace (0.85 mm) and no-brace (0.79 mm) groups (P = .72), or in the proportion of fused levels between the brace (89%) and no-brace (97%) groups (P = .37). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest no advantage in wearing a cervical brace following 1- or 2-level ACDF surgery with respect to 1-year outcome scores, 1-year fusion rates, and 6-month subsidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5810890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58108902018-02-16 Is Cervical Bracing Necessary After One- and Two-Level Instrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Randomized Study Overley, Samuel C. Merrill, Robert K. Baird, Evan O. Meaike, Joshua J. Cho, Samuel K. Hecht, Andrew C. Qureshi, Sheeraz A. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of cervical collars in postoperative care following 1- and 2-level instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: The Cervical Spine Research Society Resident Fellow Grant funded this project. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing 1- or 2-level ACDF surgery were randomized into groups receiving either no brace or a cervical brace for 6 weeks postoperatively. Neck Disability Index scores were recorded preoperatively and at regular follow-up visits up to 1 year. Computed tomography scans were read 1 year postoperatively to determine fusion rates, and subsidence was measured as change in middle vertebral distance between initial postoperative and 6-month follow-up lateral cervical radiographs. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were in the no-brace group, and 22 patients were in the brace group at final follow-up, with an average age of 50 and 55 years, respectively. The no-brace group had a total of 32 operative levels, whereas the brace group had 38 operative levels. There was no statistically significant difference in 1-year postoperative Neck Disability Index scores between the brace (9.30) and no-brace (6.95) groups (P = .28), in 6-month subsidence of all operative levels between the brace (0.85 mm) and no-brace (0.79 mm) groups (P = .72), or in the proportion of fused levels between the brace (89%) and no-brace (97%) groups (P = .37). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest no advantage in wearing a cervical brace following 1- or 2-level ACDF surgery with respect to 1-year outcome scores, 1-year fusion rates, and 6-month subsidence. SAGE Publications 2017-04-07 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5810890/ /pubmed/29456914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217697318 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Overley, Samuel C. Merrill, Robert K. Baird, Evan O. Meaike, Joshua J. Cho, Samuel K. Hecht, Andrew C. Qureshi, Sheeraz A. Is Cervical Bracing Necessary After One- and Two-Level Instrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Randomized Study |
title | Is Cervical Bracing Necessary After One- and Two-Level Instrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_full | Is Cervical Bracing Necessary After One- and Two-Level Instrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_fullStr | Is Cervical Bracing Necessary After One- and Two-Level Instrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Cervical Bracing Necessary After One- and Two-Level Instrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_short | Is Cervical Bracing Necessary After One- and Two-Level Instrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_sort | is cervical bracing necessary after one- and two-level instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? a prospective randomized study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29456914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217697318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT overleysamuelc iscervicalbracingnecessaryafteroneandtwolevelinstrumentedanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT merrillrobertk iscervicalbracingnecessaryafteroneandtwolevelinstrumentedanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT bairdevano iscervicalbracingnecessaryafteroneandtwolevelinstrumentedanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT meaikejoshuaj iscervicalbracingnecessaryafteroneandtwolevelinstrumentedanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT chosamuelk iscervicalbracingnecessaryafteroneandtwolevelinstrumentedanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT hechtandrewc iscervicalbracingnecessaryafteroneandtwolevelinstrumentedanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT qureshisheeraza iscervicalbracingnecessaryafteroneandtwolevelinstrumentedanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy |