Cargando…

Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system

The GroE chaperonin system, which comprises GroEL and GroES, assists protein folding in vivo and in vitro. It is conserved in all prokaryotes except in most, but not all, members of the class of mollicutes. In Escherichia coli, about 60 proteins were found to be obligatory clients of the GroE system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwarz, Dominik, Adato, Orit, Horovitz, Amnon, Unger, Ron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192619
_version_ 1783299793121968128
author Schwarz, Dominik
Adato, Orit
Horovitz, Amnon
Unger, Ron
author_facet Schwarz, Dominik
Adato, Orit
Horovitz, Amnon
Unger, Ron
author_sort Schwarz, Dominik
collection PubMed
description The GroE chaperonin system, which comprises GroEL and GroES, assists protein folding in vivo and in vitro. It is conserved in all prokaryotes except in most, but not all, members of the class of mollicutes. In Escherichia coli, about 60 proteins were found to be obligatory clients of the GroE system. Here, we describe the properties of the homologs of these GroE clients in mollicutes and the evolution of chaperonins in this class of bacteria. Comparing the properties of these homologs in mollicutes with and without chaperonins enabled us to search for features correlated with the presence of GroE. Interestingly, no sequence-based features of proteins such as average length, amino acid composition and predicted folding/disorder propensity were found to be affected by the absence of GroE. Other properties such as genome size and number of proteins were also found to not differ between mollicute species with and without GroE. Our data suggest that two clades of mollicutes re-acquired the GroE system, thereby supporting the view that gaining the system occurred polyphyletically and not monophyletically, as previously debated. Our data also suggest that there might have been three isolated cases of lateral gene transfer from specific bacterial sources. Taken together, our data indicate that loss of GroE does not involve crossing a high evolutionary barrier and can be compensated for by a small number of changes within the few dozen client proteins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5810989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58109892018-02-28 Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system Schwarz, Dominik Adato, Orit Horovitz, Amnon Unger, Ron PLoS One Research Article The GroE chaperonin system, which comprises GroEL and GroES, assists protein folding in vivo and in vitro. It is conserved in all prokaryotes except in most, but not all, members of the class of mollicutes. In Escherichia coli, about 60 proteins were found to be obligatory clients of the GroE system. Here, we describe the properties of the homologs of these GroE clients in mollicutes and the evolution of chaperonins in this class of bacteria. Comparing the properties of these homologs in mollicutes with and without chaperonins enabled us to search for features correlated with the presence of GroE. Interestingly, no sequence-based features of proteins such as average length, amino acid composition and predicted folding/disorder propensity were found to be affected by the absence of GroE. Other properties such as genome size and number of proteins were also found to not differ between mollicute species with and without GroE. Our data suggest that two clades of mollicutes re-acquired the GroE system, thereby supporting the view that gaining the system occurred polyphyletically and not monophyletically, as previously debated. Our data also suggest that there might have been three isolated cases of lateral gene transfer from specific bacterial sources. Taken together, our data indicate that loss of GroE does not involve crossing a high evolutionary barrier and can be compensated for by a small number of changes within the few dozen client proteins. Public Library of Science 2018-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5810989/ /pubmed/29438383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192619 Text en © 2018 Schwarz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schwarz, Dominik
Adato, Orit
Horovitz, Amnon
Unger, Ron
Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system
title Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system
title_full Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system
title_fullStr Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system
title_full_unstemmed Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system
title_short Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system
title_sort comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192619
work_keys_str_mv AT schwarzdominik comparativegenomicanalysisofmollicuteswithandwithoutachaperoninsystem
AT adatoorit comparativegenomicanalysisofmollicuteswithandwithoutachaperoninsystem
AT horovitzamnon comparativegenomicanalysisofmollicuteswithandwithoutachaperoninsystem
AT ungerron comparativegenomicanalysisofmollicuteswithandwithoutachaperoninsystem