Cargando…

The complete conformational free energy landscape of β-xylose reveals a two-fold catalytic itinerary for β-xylanases

Unraveling the conformational catalytic itinerary of glycoside hydrolases (GHs) is a growing topic of interest in glycobiology, with major impact in the design of GH inhibitors. β-xylanases are responsible for the hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds in β-xylans, a group of hemicelluloses of high biotechn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iglesias-Fernández, Javier, Raich, Lluís, Ardèvol, Albert, Rovira, Carme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29560204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4sc02240h
Descripción
Sumario:Unraveling the conformational catalytic itinerary of glycoside hydrolases (GHs) is a growing topic of interest in glycobiology, with major impact in the design of GH inhibitors. β-xylanases are responsible for the hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds in β-xylans, a group of hemicelluloses of high biotechnological interest that are found in plant cell walls. The precise conformations followed by the substrate during catalysis in β-xylanases have not been unambiguously resolved, with three different pathways being proposed from structural analyses. In this work, we compute the conformational free energy landscape (FEL) of β-xylose to predict the most likely catalytic itineraries followed by β-xylanases. The calculations are performed by means of ab initio metadynamics, using the Cremer–Pople puckering coordinates as collective variables. The computed FEL supports only two of the previously proposed itineraries, (2)S(O) → [(2,5)B](ǂ) → (5)S(1) and (1)S(3) → [(4)H(3)](ǂ) → (4)C(1), which clearly appear in low energy regions of the FEL. Consistently, (2)S(O) and (1)S(3) are conformations preactivated for catalysis in terms of free energy/anomeric charge and bond distances. The results however exclude the (O)E → [(O)S(2)](ǂ) → B(2,5) itinerary that has been recently proposed for a family 11 xylanase. Classical and ab initio QM/MM molecular dynamics simulations reveal that, in this case, the observed (O)E conformation has been enforced by enzyme mutation. These results add a word of caution on using modified enzymes to inform on catalytic conformational itineraries of glycoside hydrolases.