Cargando…

Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix was introduced in breast reconstruction in 2001 and is gradually becoming a standard component for immediate breast reconstruction and nipple-sparing mastectomy. The reconstructive technique allows for improved aesthetic outcomes. However, there seems to be uncert...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj, Gunnarsson, Gudjon L., Salzberg, C. Andrew, Sørensen, Jens Ahm, Thomsen, Jørn Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29464161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001625
_version_ 1783299846182010880
author Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj
Gunnarsson, Gudjon L.
Salzberg, C. Andrew
Sørensen, Jens Ahm
Thomsen, Jørn Bo
author_facet Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj
Gunnarsson, Gudjon L.
Salzberg, C. Andrew
Sørensen, Jens Ahm
Thomsen, Jørn Bo
author_sort Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix was introduced in breast reconstruction in 2001 and is gradually becoming a standard component for immediate breast reconstruction and nipple-sparing mastectomy. The reconstructive technique allows for improved aesthetic outcomes. However, there seems to be uncertainty regarding complication rates. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate complication rates related to this method. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the recommendations outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for reviews and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Relevant databases were searched for in the literature concerning the use of acellular dermal matrix in implant-based nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. All studies underwent detailed quality assessment. Summarized outcome rates were computed using meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine of 1,039 studies were eligible for inclusion yielding 778 procedures. The quality was acceptable for all included studies. The meta-analysis found the rate of skin necrosis to be 11%, nipple necrosis 5%, infection in 12%, hematoma in 1%, treated seroma in 5%, explantation 4%, and unplanned return to the operating room in 9%. CONCLUSION: The use of acellular dermal matrix in nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction can be done with acceptable complication rates in selected patients. We recommend future studies to include specific definitions when reporting complication rates. Furthermore, future studies should elaborate on demographic characteristics of the included study samples and include predictor analysis to enhance knowledge of high risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5811291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58112912018-02-20 Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj Gunnarsson, Gudjon L. Salzberg, C. Andrew Sørensen, Jens Ahm Thomsen, Jørn Bo Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix was introduced in breast reconstruction in 2001 and is gradually becoming a standard component for immediate breast reconstruction and nipple-sparing mastectomy. The reconstructive technique allows for improved aesthetic outcomes. However, there seems to be uncertainty regarding complication rates. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate complication rates related to this method. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the recommendations outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for reviews and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Relevant databases were searched for in the literature concerning the use of acellular dermal matrix in implant-based nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. All studies underwent detailed quality assessment. Summarized outcome rates were computed using meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine of 1,039 studies were eligible for inclusion yielding 778 procedures. The quality was acceptable for all included studies. The meta-analysis found the rate of skin necrosis to be 11%, nipple necrosis 5%, infection in 12%, hematoma in 1%, treated seroma in 5%, explantation 4%, and unplanned return to the operating room in 9%. CONCLUSION: The use of acellular dermal matrix in nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction can be done with acceptable complication rates in selected patients. We recommend future studies to include specific definitions when reporting complication rates. Furthermore, future studies should elaborate on demographic characteristics of the included study samples and include predictor analysis to enhance knowledge of high risk patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5811291/ /pubmed/29464161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001625 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj
Gunnarsson, Gudjon L.
Salzberg, C. Andrew
Sørensen, Jens Ahm
Thomsen, Jørn Bo
Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort complications following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate acellular dermal matrix implant-based breast reconstruction—a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29464161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001625
work_keys_str_mv AT heidemannlenenyhøj complicationsfollowingnipplesparingmastectomyandimmediateacellulardermalmatriximplantbasedbreastreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gunnarssongudjonl complicationsfollowingnipplesparingmastectomyandimmediateacellulardermalmatriximplantbasedbreastreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT salzbergcandrew complicationsfollowingnipplesparingmastectomyandimmediateacellulardermalmatriximplantbasedbreastreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sørensenjensahm complicationsfollowingnipplesparingmastectomyandimmediateacellulardermalmatriximplantbasedbreastreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thomsenjørnbo complicationsfollowingnipplesparingmastectomyandimmediateacellulardermalmatriximplantbasedbreastreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis