Cargando…
Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix was introduced in breast reconstruction in 2001 and is gradually becoming a standard component for immediate breast reconstruction and nipple-sparing mastectomy. The reconstructive technique allows for improved aesthetic outcomes. However, there seems to be uncert...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29464161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001625 |
_version_ | 1783299846182010880 |
---|---|
author | Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj Gunnarsson, Gudjon L. Salzberg, C. Andrew Sørensen, Jens Ahm Thomsen, Jørn Bo |
author_facet | Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj Gunnarsson, Gudjon L. Salzberg, C. Andrew Sørensen, Jens Ahm Thomsen, Jørn Bo |
author_sort | Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix was introduced in breast reconstruction in 2001 and is gradually becoming a standard component for immediate breast reconstruction and nipple-sparing mastectomy. The reconstructive technique allows for improved aesthetic outcomes. However, there seems to be uncertainty regarding complication rates. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate complication rates related to this method. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the recommendations outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for reviews and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Relevant databases were searched for in the literature concerning the use of acellular dermal matrix in implant-based nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. All studies underwent detailed quality assessment. Summarized outcome rates were computed using meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine of 1,039 studies were eligible for inclusion yielding 778 procedures. The quality was acceptable for all included studies. The meta-analysis found the rate of skin necrosis to be 11%, nipple necrosis 5%, infection in 12%, hematoma in 1%, treated seroma in 5%, explantation 4%, and unplanned return to the operating room in 9%. CONCLUSION: The use of acellular dermal matrix in nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction can be done with acceptable complication rates in selected patients. We recommend future studies to include specific definitions when reporting complication rates. Furthermore, future studies should elaborate on demographic characteristics of the included study samples and include predictor analysis to enhance knowledge of high risk patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5811291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58112912018-02-20 Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj Gunnarsson, Gudjon L. Salzberg, C. Andrew Sørensen, Jens Ahm Thomsen, Jørn Bo Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix was introduced in breast reconstruction in 2001 and is gradually becoming a standard component for immediate breast reconstruction and nipple-sparing mastectomy. The reconstructive technique allows for improved aesthetic outcomes. However, there seems to be uncertainty regarding complication rates. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate complication rates related to this method. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the recommendations outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for reviews and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Relevant databases were searched for in the literature concerning the use of acellular dermal matrix in implant-based nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. All studies underwent detailed quality assessment. Summarized outcome rates were computed using meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine of 1,039 studies were eligible for inclusion yielding 778 procedures. The quality was acceptable for all included studies. The meta-analysis found the rate of skin necrosis to be 11%, nipple necrosis 5%, infection in 12%, hematoma in 1%, treated seroma in 5%, explantation 4%, and unplanned return to the operating room in 9%. CONCLUSION: The use of acellular dermal matrix in nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction can be done with acceptable complication rates in selected patients. We recommend future studies to include specific definitions when reporting complication rates. Furthermore, future studies should elaborate on demographic characteristics of the included study samples and include predictor analysis to enhance knowledge of high risk patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5811291/ /pubmed/29464161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001625 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Heidemann, Lene Nyhøj Gunnarsson, Gudjon L. Salzberg, C. Andrew Sørensen, Jens Ahm Thomsen, Jørn Bo Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | complications following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate acellular dermal matrix implant-based breast reconstruction—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29464161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001625 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heidemannlenenyhøj complicationsfollowingnipplesparingmastectomyandimmediateacellulardermalmatriximplantbasedbreastreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gunnarssongudjonl complicationsfollowingnipplesparingmastectomyandimmediateacellulardermalmatriximplantbasedbreastreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT salzbergcandrew complicationsfollowingnipplesparingmastectomyandimmediateacellulardermalmatriximplantbasedbreastreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sørensenjensahm complicationsfollowingnipplesparingmastectomyandimmediateacellulardermalmatriximplantbasedbreastreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT thomsenjørnbo complicationsfollowingnipplesparingmastectomyandimmediateacellulardermalmatriximplantbasedbreastreconstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |