Cargando…

Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation

Skin conductance responses (SCR) are increasingly analyzed with model‐based approaches that assume a linear and time‐invariant (LTI) mapping from sudomotor nerve (SN) activity to observed SCR. These LTI assumptions have previously been validated indirectly, by quantifying how much variance in SCR el...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerster, Samuel, Namer, Barbara, Elam, Mikael, Bach, Dominik R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28862764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12986
_version_ 1783299921599791104
author Gerster, Samuel
Namer, Barbara
Elam, Mikael
Bach, Dominik R.
author_facet Gerster, Samuel
Namer, Barbara
Elam, Mikael
Bach, Dominik R.
author_sort Gerster, Samuel
collection PubMed
description Skin conductance responses (SCR) are increasingly analyzed with model‐based approaches that assume a linear and time‐invariant (LTI) mapping from sudomotor nerve (SN) activity to observed SCR. These LTI assumptions have previously been validated indirectly, by quantifying how much variance in SCR elicited by sensory stimulation is explained under an LTI model. This approach, however, collapses sources of variability in the nervous and effector organ systems. Here, we directly focus on the SN/SCR mapping by harnessing two invasive methods. In an intraneural recording experiment, we simultaneously track SN activity and SCR. This allows assessing the SN/SCR relationship but possibly suffers from interfering activity of non‐SN sympathetic fibers. In an intraneural stimulation experiment under regional anesthesia, such influences are removed. In this stimulation experiment, about 95% of SCR variance is explained under LTI assumptions when stimulation frequency is below 0.6 Hz. At higher frequencies, nonlinearities occur. In the intraneural recording experiment, explained SCR variance is lower, possibly indicating interference from non‐SN fibers, but higher than in our previous indirect tests. We conclude that LTI systems may not only be a useful approximation but in fact a rather accurate description of biophysical reality in the SN/SCR system, under conditions of low baseline activity and sporadic external stimuli. Intraneural stimulation under regional anesthesia is the most sensitive method to address this question.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5811801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58118012018-02-16 Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation Gerster, Samuel Namer, Barbara Elam, Mikael Bach, Dominik R. Psychophysiology Original Articles Skin conductance responses (SCR) are increasingly analyzed with model‐based approaches that assume a linear and time‐invariant (LTI) mapping from sudomotor nerve (SN) activity to observed SCR. These LTI assumptions have previously been validated indirectly, by quantifying how much variance in SCR elicited by sensory stimulation is explained under an LTI model. This approach, however, collapses sources of variability in the nervous and effector organ systems. Here, we directly focus on the SN/SCR mapping by harnessing two invasive methods. In an intraneural recording experiment, we simultaneously track SN activity and SCR. This allows assessing the SN/SCR relationship but possibly suffers from interfering activity of non‐SN sympathetic fibers. In an intraneural stimulation experiment under regional anesthesia, such influences are removed. In this stimulation experiment, about 95% of SCR variance is explained under LTI assumptions when stimulation frequency is below 0.6 Hz. At higher frequencies, nonlinearities occur. In the intraneural recording experiment, explained SCR variance is lower, possibly indicating interference from non‐SN fibers, but higher than in our previous indirect tests. We conclude that LTI systems may not only be a useful approximation but in fact a rather accurate description of biophysical reality in the SN/SCR system, under conditions of low baseline activity and sporadic external stimuli. Intraneural stimulation under regional anesthesia is the most sensitive method to address this question. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-01 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5811801/ /pubmed/28862764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12986 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gerster, Samuel
Namer, Barbara
Elam, Mikael
Bach, Dominik R.
Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation
title Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation
title_full Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation
title_fullStr Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation
title_short Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation
title_sort testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28862764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12986
work_keys_str_mv AT gerstersamuel testingalineartimeinvariantmodelforskinconductanceresponsesbyintraneuralrecordingandstimulation
AT namerbarbara testingalineartimeinvariantmodelforskinconductanceresponsesbyintraneuralrecordingandstimulation
AT elammikael testingalineartimeinvariantmodelforskinconductanceresponsesbyintraneuralrecordingandstimulation
AT bachdominikr testingalineartimeinvariantmodelforskinconductanceresponsesbyintraneuralrecordingandstimulation