Cargando…
Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation
Skin conductance responses (SCR) are increasingly analyzed with model‐based approaches that assume a linear and time‐invariant (LTI) mapping from sudomotor nerve (SN) activity to observed SCR. These LTI assumptions have previously been validated indirectly, by quantifying how much variance in SCR el...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28862764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12986 |
_version_ | 1783299921599791104 |
---|---|
author | Gerster, Samuel Namer, Barbara Elam, Mikael Bach, Dominik R. |
author_facet | Gerster, Samuel Namer, Barbara Elam, Mikael Bach, Dominik R. |
author_sort | Gerster, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Skin conductance responses (SCR) are increasingly analyzed with model‐based approaches that assume a linear and time‐invariant (LTI) mapping from sudomotor nerve (SN) activity to observed SCR. These LTI assumptions have previously been validated indirectly, by quantifying how much variance in SCR elicited by sensory stimulation is explained under an LTI model. This approach, however, collapses sources of variability in the nervous and effector organ systems. Here, we directly focus on the SN/SCR mapping by harnessing two invasive methods. In an intraneural recording experiment, we simultaneously track SN activity and SCR. This allows assessing the SN/SCR relationship but possibly suffers from interfering activity of non‐SN sympathetic fibers. In an intraneural stimulation experiment under regional anesthesia, such influences are removed. In this stimulation experiment, about 95% of SCR variance is explained under LTI assumptions when stimulation frequency is below 0.6 Hz. At higher frequencies, nonlinearities occur. In the intraneural recording experiment, explained SCR variance is lower, possibly indicating interference from non‐SN fibers, but higher than in our previous indirect tests. We conclude that LTI systems may not only be a useful approximation but in fact a rather accurate description of biophysical reality in the SN/SCR system, under conditions of low baseline activity and sporadic external stimuli. Intraneural stimulation under regional anesthesia is the most sensitive method to address this question. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5811801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58118012018-02-16 Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation Gerster, Samuel Namer, Barbara Elam, Mikael Bach, Dominik R. Psychophysiology Original Articles Skin conductance responses (SCR) are increasingly analyzed with model‐based approaches that assume a linear and time‐invariant (LTI) mapping from sudomotor nerve (SN) activity to observed SCR. These LTI assumptions have previously been validated indirectly, by quantifying how much variance in SCR elicited by sensory stimulation is explained under an LTI model. This approach, however, collapses sources of variability in the nervous and effector organ systems. Here, we directly focus on the SN/SCR mapping by harnessing two invasive methods. In an intraneural recording experiment, we simultaneously track SN activity and SCR. This allows assessing the SN/SCR relationship but possibly suffers from interfering activity of non‐SN sympathetic fibers. In an intraneural stimulation experiment under regional anesthesia, such influences are removed. In this stimulation experiment, about 95% of SCR variance is explained under LTI assumptions when stimulation frequency is below 0.6 Hz. At higher frequencies, nonlinearities occur. In the intraneural recording experiment, explained SCR variance is lower, possibly indicating interference from non‐SN fibers, but higher than in our previous indirect tests. We conclude that LTI systems may not only be a useful approximation but in fact a rather accurate description of biophysical reality in the SN/SCR system, under conditions of low baseline activity and sporadic external stimuli. Intraneural stimulation under regional anesthesia is the most sensitive method to address this question. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-01 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5811801/ /pubmed/28862764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12986 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Gerster, Samuel Namer, Barbara Elam, Mikael Bach, Dominik R. Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation |
title | Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation |
title_full | Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation |
title_fullStr | Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation |
title_short | Testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation |
title_sort | testing a linear time invariant model for skin conductance responses by intraneural recording and stimulation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28862764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12986 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gerstersamuel testingalineartimeinvariantmodelforskinconductanceresponsesbyintraneuralrecordingandstimulation AT namerbarbara testingalineartimeinvariantmodelforskinconductanceresponsesbyintraneuralrecordingandstimulation AT elammikael testingalineartimeinvariantmodelforskinconductanceresponsesbyintraneuralrecordingandstimulation AT bachdominikr testingalineartimeinvariantmodelforskinconductanceresponsesbyintraneuralrecordingandstimulation |